IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v208y2026ics0965856426001266.html

Understanding walking route choice preferences and pedestrian network flows: From individual trajectories to city-scale patterns using empirical data from Sydney

Author

Listed:
  • Lilasathapornkit, Tanapon
  • Nourmohammadi, Fatemeh
  • Saberi, Meead

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of built environment factors on pedestrian route choices in an urban context using passively collected mobile phone trajectory data from Sydney, Australia. We estimate and compare multiple discrete choice models including C-Logit, Path Size Logit (PSL), and Error Component (EC) models to quantify associations between pedestrian route choices and route characteristics such as distance, slope, turns, crossings, amenities, and greenery. The models are applied to a high-resolution sidewalk network to simulate pedestrian flows across the city. Our findings are broadly consistent with existing literature, highlighting the importance of route simplicity, directness, and terrain in walking behavior. A key contribution of this study is the integration of passively collected GPS trajectories with route choice modeling and network-level flow assignment, demonstrating a scalable framework for understanding and forecasting pedestrian behavior. The approach enables city-scale assessments of pedestrian infrastructure and offers valuable insights for data-driven planning of walkable urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilasathapornkit, Tanapon & Nourmohammadi, Fatemeh & Saberi, Meead, 2026. "Understanding walking route choice preferences and pedestrian network flows: From individual trajectories to city-scale patterns using empirical data from Sydney," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:208:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426001266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seo, Toru & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Gotoh, Hiroto & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Interactive online machine learning approach for activity-travel survey," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 362-373.
    2. Melissa R. Marselle & Katherine N. Irvine & Sara L. Warber, 2013. "Walking for Well-Being: Are Group Walks in Certain Types of Natural Environments Better for Well-Being than Group Walks in Urban Environments?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Ali Najmi & Sahar Nazari & Farshid Safarighouzhdi & C Raina MacIntyre & Eric J Miller & Taha H. Rashidi, 2021. "Facemask and social distancing, pillars of opening up economies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Lu, Wei & Scott, Darren M. & Dalumpines, Ron, 2018. "Understanding bike share cyclist route choice using GPS data: Comparing dominant routes and shortest paths," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 172-181.
    5. Gary Pivo & Jeffrey D. Fisher, 2011. "The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 39(2), pages 185-219, June.
    6. Koh, Puay Ping & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2013. "Comparing pedestrians’ needs and behaviours in different land use environments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 43-50.
    7. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M. & Ben-Akiva, M., 2009. "Sampling of alternatives for route choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 984-994, December.
    8. Lieu, Seung Jae & Guhathakurta, Subhrajit, 2025. "Exploring pedestrian route choice preferences by demographic groups: Analysis of street attributes in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Giles-Corti, Billie & Bull, Fiona & Knuiman, Matthew & McCormack, Gavin & Van Niel, Kimberly & Timperio, Anna & Christian, Hayley & Foster, Sarah & Divitini, Mark & Middleton, Nick & Boruff, Bryan, 2013. "The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: Longitudinal results from the RESIDE study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 20-30.
    10. Broach, Joseph & Dill, Jennifer & Gliebe, John, 2012. "Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1730-1740.
    11. Duncan, Lawrence Christopher & Watling, David Paul & Connors, Richard Dominic & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2020. "Path Size Logit route choice models: Issues with current models, a new internally consistent approach, and parameter estimation on a large-scale network with GPS data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-40.
    12. Matthew Carmona, 2019. "Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-48, January.
    13. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    14. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387, June.
    15. David Hensher & William Greene, 2003. "The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 133-176, May.
    16. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M., 2007. "Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 363-378, March.
    17. Roorda, Matthew J. & Miller, Eric J. & Habib, Khandker M.N., 2008. "Validation of TASHA: A 24-h activity scheduling microsimulation model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 360-375, February.
    18. Marta C. González & César A. Hidalgo & Albert-László Barabási, 2009. "Understanding individual human mobility patterns," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7235), pages 238-238, March.
    19. Bolduc, Denis, 1999. "A practical technique to estimate multinomial probit models in transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 63-79, February.
    20. Krista Merry & Pete Bettinger, 2019. "Smartphone GPS accuracy study in an urban environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    21. Basu, Rounaq & Sevtsuk, Andres, 2022. "How do street attributes affect willingness-to-walk? City-wide pedestrian route choice analysis using big data from Boston and San Francisco," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-19.
    22. Guo, Zhan & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2013. "Pedestrian environment and route choice: evidence from New York City and Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 124-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lilasathapornkit, Tanapon & Bhowmick, Debjit & Beck, Ben & Wu, Hao & Pettit, Christopher & Nice, Kerry & Seneviratne, Sachith & Gupta, Mohit & Vu, Hai L. & Nelson, Trisalyn & Saberi, Meead, 2025. "Cycling route choice preferences: A taste heterogeneity and exogenous segmentation analysis based on age, gender, Geller typology, and e-bike use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Lieu, Seung Jae & Guhathakurta, Subhrajit, 2025. "Exploring pedestrian route choice preferences by demographic groups: Analysis of street attributes in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Zhu, Dianchen & Sze, N.N. & Feng, Zhongxiang & Chan, Ho-Yin, 2023. "Waiting for signalized crossing or walking to footbridge/underpass? Examining the effect of weather using stated choice experiment with panel mixed random regret minimization approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 144-169.
    4. Yeh, Chia-Jung & Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne, 2026. "Unveiling the impact of bus network design on route choice: An empirical review from smartcard data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2026. "Modeling e-scooter route choices: Infrastructural preferences and intervention scenario analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Fosgerau, Mogens & Bierlaire, Michel, 2007. "A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 784-794, August.
    7. Saha, Bijoy & Fatmi, Mahmudur Rahman, 2025. "Modeling bicyclists' destination location choice: Spatial-temporal constraint for choice set generation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Tien Mai & Fabian Bastin & Emma Frejinger, 2018. "A decomposition method for estimating recursive logit based route choice models," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 253-275, September.
    9. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Scaccia, Luisa & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2023. "Prediction and confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for mixed logit models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 54-78.
    11. Frick, Bernd & Barros, Carlos Pestana & Prinz, Joachim, 2010. "Analysing head coach dismissals in the German "Bundesliga" with a mixed logit approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 151-159, January.
    12. Meredith Fowlie, 2010. "Emissions Trading, Electricity Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 837-869, June.
    13. de Ayala, Amaia & Hoyos, David & Mariel, Petr, 2015. "Suitability of discrete choice experiments for landscape management under the European Landscape Convention," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 79-96.
    14. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Ferreira, Candida & Williams, Jonathan, 2007. "Analysing the determinants of performance of best and worst European banks: A mixed logit approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 2189-2203, July.
    15. Martínez-Pardo, Ana & Orro, Alfonso & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena, 2020. "Analysis of port choice: A methodological proposal adjusted with public data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 178-193.
    16. Juan Carlos Martín & Concepción Román & Cira Mendoza, 2018. "Determinants for sun-and-beach self-catering accommodation selection," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(3), pages 319-336, May.
    17. Deka, Devajyoti & Carnegie, Jon, 2021. "Predicting transit mode choice of New Jersey workers commuting to New York City from a stated preference survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Thai, Thao & Lancsar, Emily & Spinks, Jean & Freeman, Christopher & Chen, Gang, 2024. "Understanding Australian pharmacy degree holders’ job preferences through the lens of motivation-hygiene theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    19. Lourenço-Gomes, Lina & Gonçalves, Tânia & Pinto, Lígia, 2026. "Understanding unobserved heterogeneity in consumer preferences: A comparative analysis of discrete choice models," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2).
    20. Wolff, François-Charles & Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre & Trouillet, Brice & Pigeault, Alexia & Rollo, Nicolas, 2026. "Participatory democracy in question: The case of “the sea in debate”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:208:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.