IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v206y2026ics0965856426000625.html

Modeling e-scooter route choices: Infrastructural preferences and intervention scenario analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Shuting
  • Cao, Zhejing
  • Zhang, Xiaohu

Abstract

The e-scooters offer a flexible and sustainable alternative to traditional transport modes. To maximize its benefits, cities need strategic infrastructure enhancements. However, there is still a lack of research on how built environment factors affect e-scooter routing in a nonlinear manner, and how the nonlinearity may affect policy interventions. To bridge this gap, this study draws inspiration from three-factor theory to classify built environment attributes into eight types and analyze how bike lanes interact with these attributes to influence route preferences. By employing a perturbed utility route choice model, we examine infrastructural preferences of e-scooter routing from extensive GPS trajectories. Our results show that roads with high tree coverage and asphalt bike lanes see a generalized cost reduction of 28.6% compared to roads with moderate tree coverage and no asphalt bike lanes, while roads with low tree coverage increase 16.2% of generalized cost relative to the same reference road type. This highlights an asymmetric and nonlinear influence of built environment attributes on e-scooter route choices. Scenario simulation suggests that increasing tree coverage from moderate to high on roads with asphalt bike lanes or constructing new asphalt bike lanes on roads with high tree coverage are particularly effective in reducing generalized route costs. Our study offers a more nuanced understanding of infrastructural preferences in e-scooter route choices, and provides an analytic framework to enhance e-scooter adoption and inform policy-making to cater to future micro-mobility needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2026. "Modeling e-scooter route choices: Infrastructural preferences and intervention scenario analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000625
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.