IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v123y2025ics0966692325000080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive scootability index: Built environment, travel purpose and e-scooter preferred route

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Shuting
  • Cao, Zhejing
  • Zhang, Xiaohu

Abstract

E-scooter sharing has gained popularity globally. While previous research has explored the relationship between e-scooter usage and the built environment, scant attention has been devoted to evaluating how the built environment affects e-scooter route choices with different trip purposes. This study thus proposes an analytical framework to examine e-scooter route preferences across diverse trip purposes and develops an adaptive scootability index using ensemble feature weighting. By analyzing 161,426 e-scooter GPS trajectories from Brisbane and Christchurch, we found e-scooter sharing was mainly used for non-commuting trips (e.g. dining, leisure). The computation of adaptive scootability index revealed that e-scooter route preferences did vary with trip purposes. For instance, e-scooter trips to access public transit are more direct and favor streets of higher hierarchy, while leisure trips prefer scenic routes with gardens and abundant greenery. Finally, the mapping of scootability can help identify streets that require enhancements to promote e-scooter related travels.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2025. "Adaptive scootability index: Built environment, travel purpose and e-scooter preferred route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:123:y:2025:i:c:s0966692325000080
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325000080
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giulia Reggiani & Tim Oijen & Homayoun Hamedmoghadam & Winnie Daamen & Hai L. Vu & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2022. "Understanding bikeability: a methodology to assess urban networks," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 897-925, June.
    2. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    3. Foissaud, Nicolas & Gioldasis, Christos & Tamura, Shun & Christoforou, Zoi & Farhi, Nadir, 2022. "Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas: A spatiotemporal analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. McKenzie, Grant, 2019. "Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 19-28.
    5. Lin, Jen-Jia & Wei, Yi-Hsuan, 2018. "Assessing area-wide bikeability: A grey analytic network process," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 381-396.
    6. Arellana, Julián & Saltarín, María & Larrañaga, Ana Margarita & González, Virginia I. & Henao, César Augusto, 2020. "Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 310-334.
    7. Jonas Schmid-Querg & Andreas Keler & Georgios Grigoropoulos, 2021. "The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Park, Yujin & Akar, Gulsah, 2019. "Why do bicyclists take detours? A multilevel regression model using smartphone GPS data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 191-200.
    9. Mina Lee & Joseph Y. J. Chow & Gyugeun Yoon & Brian Yueshuai He, 2019. "Forecasting e-scooter substitution of direct and access trips by mode and distance," Papers 1908.08127, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    10. Fitt, Helen & Curl, Angela, 2020. "The early days of shared micromobility: A social practices approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Raith, Andrea & van Houtte, Chris, 2012. "A bi-objective cyclist route choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 652-663.
    12. Clare Field & Ihnji Jon, 2021. "E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 368-396, May.
    13. Lina Wahlgren & Peter Schantz, 2014. "Exploring Bikeability in a Suburban Metropolitan Area Using the Active Commuting Route Environment Scale (ACRES)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Xing, Yingying & Wang, Ke & Lu, Jian John, 2020. "Exploring travel patterns and trip purposes of dockless bike-sharing by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Huo, Jinghai & Yang, Hongtai & Li, Chaojing & Zheng, Rong & Yang, Linchuan & Wen, Yi, 2021. "Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krauss, Konstantin & Gnann, Till & Burgert, Tobias & Axhausen, Kay W., 2024. "Faster, greener, scooter? An assessment of shared e-scooter usage based on real-world driving data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Fernando Fonseca & Paulo Ribeiro & Carolina Neiva, 2023. "A Planning Practice Method to Assess the Potential for Cycling and to Design a Bicycle Network in a Starter Cycling City in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Jin, Scarlett T. & Sui, Daniel Z., 2024. "A comparative analysis of the spatial determinants of e-bike and e-scooter sharing link flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Jin, Scarlett T. & Wang, Lei & Sui, Daniel, 2023. "How the built environment affects E-scooter sharing link flows: A machine learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Jurgis Zagorskas & Marija Burinskienė, 2019. "Challenges Caused by Increased Use of E-Powered Personal Mobility Vehicles in European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Michael Hardinghaus & Simon Nieland & Marius Lehne & Jan Weschke, 2021. "More than Bike Lanes—A Multifactorial Index of Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Draženko Glavić & Marina Milenković & Aleksandar Trifunović & Igor Jokanović & Jelica Komarica, 2023. "Influence of Dockless Shared E-Scooters on Urban Mobility: WTP and Modal Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Shah, Nitesh R. & Ziedan, Abubakr & Brakewood, Candace & Cherry, Christopher R., 2023. "Shared e-scooter service providers with large fleet size have a competitive advantage: Findings from e-scooter demand and supply analysis of Nashville, Tennessee," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Kimpton, Anthony & Loginova, Julia & Pojani, Dorina & Bean, Richard & Sigler, Thomas & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2022. "Weather to scoot? How weather shapes shared e-scooter ridership patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Shah, Nitesh R. & Guo, Jing & Han, Lee D. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2023. "Why do people take e-scooter trips? Insights on temporal and spatial usage patterns of detailed trip data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Bertha Santos & Sílvia Passos & Jorge Gonçalves & Isabel Matias, 2022. "Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis for Road Segment Cycling Suitability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Yin, Zehui & Rybarczyk, Greg & Zheng, Anran & Su, Lin & Sun, Bingrong & Yan, Xiang, 2024. "Shared micromobility as a first- and last-mile transit solution? Spatiotemporal insights from a novel dataset," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Zhang, Lihong & Lieske, Scott N. & Pojani, Dorina & Buning, Richard J. & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2025. "Hybrid machine learning-based approaches for modeling bikeability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Alexandra König & Laura Gebhardt & Kerstin Stark & Julia Schuppan, 2022. "A Multi-Perspective Assessment of the Introduction of E-Scooter Sharing in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    16. Orvin, Muntahith Mehadil & Fatmi, Mahmudur Rahman & Chowdhury, Subeh, 2021. "Taking another look at cycling demand modeling: A comparison between two cities in Canada and New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Szemere, Dorottya & Surman, Vivien, 2025. "Az elektromos rollerek integrációjának vizsgálata Magyarországon [The integration of electric scooters in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 312-327.
    18. Foissaud, Nicolas & Gioldasis, Christos & Tamura, Shun & Christoforou, Zoi & Farhi, Nadir, 2022. "Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas: A spatiotemporal analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Bergh, Andreas & Mehic, Adrian & Sandberg, David & Wernberg, Joakim, 2025. "E-scooters and Traffic Accidents: Evidence from Staggered Roll-Out in Swedish Municipalities," Working Paper Series 1520, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    20. Morteza Hossein Sabbaghian & David Llopis-Castelló & Alfredo García, 2023. "A Safe Infrastructure for Micromobility: The Current State of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:123:y:2025:i:c:s0966692325000080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.