IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v204y2026ics0965856425004616.html

How do regulations and safety perceptions affect the willingness to use e-scooters?

Author

Listed:
  • Izquierdo-Herazo, Ely
  • Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio
  • Gutiérrez, Margareth
  • Ramos, Raúl
  • Cantillo, Víctor

Abstract

The growing popularity of electric scooters has been accompanied by discussions about the regulations needed to reduce the externalities associated with their use. This study analyzes the influence of regulations and perceptions of road unsafety on the willingness to use e-scooters. For this purpose, we developed a hybrid discrete choice model (HCM). The model links sociodemographic characteristics and regulations on operational attributes using data from a stated preference survey conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. The influence of regulations is mixed. Results suggest that road safety measures, such as mandatory helmet use and restricting e-scooters circulation to bike lanes and streets (banning them from pedestrian walkways), increase the willingness to use e-scooters. In contrast, parking restrictions, high fares, and the imposition of fines for violations negatively impact the intention to use e-scooters. Furthermore, perceptions of road unsafety negatively influenced the willingness to use e-scooters. A significant interaction was observed between perceptions of road unsafety and regulations, suggesting a greater acceptance of these policies among individuals who perceived e-scooters as unsafe.

Suggested Citation

  • Izquierdo-Herazo, Ely & Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio & Gutiérrez, Margareth & Ramos, Raúl & Cantillo, Víctor, 2026. "How do regulations and safety perceptions affect the willingness to use e-scooters?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004616
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425004616
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Hurlet & Ouassim Manout & Azise Oumar Diallo, 2024. "Policy implications of shared e-scooter parking regulation: an agent-based approach," Post-Print hal-04422427, HAL.
    2. Kelsey Sievert & Madeleine Roen & Curtis M. Craig & Nichole L. Morris, 2023. "A Survey of Electric-Scooter Riders’ Route Choice, Safety Perception, and Helmet Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Hugo Badia & Erik Jenelius, 2023. "Shared e-scooter micromobility: review of use patterns, perceptions and environmental impacts," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 811-837, September.
    4. Kim, Minju & Puczkowskyj, Nicholas & MacArthur, John & Dill, Jennifer, 2023. "Perspectives on e-scooters use: A multi-year cross-sectional approach to understanding e-scooter travel behavior in Portland, Oregon," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Gutiérrez, Margareth & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2025. "Willingness to change compulsory trips to bicycle: Role of habit, perceptions and the built environment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    7. Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu & Chua, Kelman & Yu, Honghai & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 177-196.
    8. Chen, Ching-Fu & Lee, Chia-Han, 2023. "Investigating shared e-scooter users’ customer value co-creation behaviors and their antecedents: Perceived service quality and perceived value," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 147-154.
    9. Choi, Siwon & Kwak, Kyuil & Yang, Soyoung & Lim, Sesil & Woo, JongRoul, 2022. "Effects of policy instruments on electric scooter adoption in Jakarta, Indonesia: A discrete choice experiment approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 373-384.
    10. Ramos, Raúl & Silva, Hugo E., 2023. "Fare evasion in public transport: How does it affect the optimal design and pricing?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Luis Márquez & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2020. "Assessing the influence of indicators’ complexity on hybrid discrete choice model estimates," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 373-396, February.
    12. Reinhardt, Karl & Deakin, Elizabeth SM., J.D., 2020. "Best Practices for the Public Management of Electric Scooters," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8x67x360, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Roig-Costa, Oriol & Miralles-Guasch, Carme & Marquet, Oriol, 2024. "Shared bikes vs. private e-scooters. Understanding patterns of use and demand in a policy-constrained micromobility environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 116-125.
    14. Riggs, William & Kawashima, Matt & Batstone, David, 2021. "Exploring best practice for municipal e-scooter policy in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 18-27.
    15. Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo & Luis Llerena-Sierra & Víctor Cantillo, 2025. "E-scooters: how do latent and socioeconomic factors affect their usage in the global south? Implications for policy planning," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 255-275, February.
    16. William Black & Barry J. Babin, 2019. "Multivariate Data Analysis: Its Approach, Evolution, and Impact," Springer Books, in: Barry J. Babin & Marko Sarstedt (ed.), The Great Facilitator, pages 121-130, Springer.
    17. Paba-Larios, María F. & Gutiérrez, Margareth & Ramos, Raúl & Cantillo, Víctor, 2025. "Modeling the influence of built environment on pedestrian perceptions in colombian cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 358-369.
    18. Rossetti, Tomás & Guevara, C. Angelo & Galilea, Patricia & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2018. "Modeling safety as a perceptual latent variable to assess cycling infrastructure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 252-265.
    19. Márquez, Luis & Soto, Jose J., 2021. "Integrating perceptions of safety and bicycle theft risk in the analysis of cycling infrastructure preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 285-301.
    20. Lanza, Kevin & Burford, Katie & Ganzar, Leigh Ann, 2022. "Who travels where: Behavior of pedestrians and micromobility users on transportation infrastructure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    21. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    22. Draženko Glavić & Marina Milenković & Aleksandar Trifunović & Igor Jokanović & Jelica Komarica, 2023. "Influence of Dockless Shared E-Scooters on Urban Mobility: WTP and Modal Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    23. Andrew Daly & Stephane Hess & Bhanu Patruni & Dimitris Potoglou & Charlene Rohr, 2012. "Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 267-297, March.
    24. Sobrino, Natalia & Gonzalez, Juan Nicolas & Vassallo, Jose Manuel & Baeza, Maria de los Angeles, 2023. "Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-18.
    25. Samadzad, Mahdi & Nosratzadeh, Hossein & Karami, Hossein & Karami, Ali, 2023. "What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user's perspective?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 70-82.
    26. Peters, Luke & MacKenzie, Don, 2019. "The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 208-226.
    27. Panagiotis G. Tzouras & Lambros Mitropoulos & Katerina Koliou & Eirini Stavropoulou & Christos Karolemeas & Eleni Antoniou & Antonis Karaloulis & Konstantinos Mitropoulos & Eleni I. Vlahogianni & Kons, 2023. "Describing Micro-Mobility First/Last-Mile Routing Behavior in Urban Road Networks through a Novel Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    28. Luigi Buongiorno & Alessandra Stellacci & Gerardo Cazzato & Pierluigi Caricato & Benedetta Pia De Luca & Francesca Tarantino & Stefania Lonero Baldassarra & Giuseppe Ingravallo & Maricla Marrone, 2022. "Slow and Steady Wins the Race: A Comparative Analysis of Standing Electric Scooters’ European Regulations Integrated with the Aspect of Forensic Traumatology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    29. Kailai Wang & Xiaodong Qian & Dillon Taylor Fitch & Yongsung Lee & Jai Malik & Giovanni Circella, 2023. "What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 5-31, January.
    30. Ralph Buehler & Andrea Broaddus & Elizabeth White & Ted Sweeney & Chris Evans, 2022. "An Exploration of the Decline in E-Scooter Ridership after the Introduction of Mandatory E-Scooter Parking Corrals on Virginia Tech’s Campus in Blacksburg, VA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    31. Shiva Pourfalatoun & Jubaer Ahmed & Erika E. Miller, 2023. "Shared Electric Scooter Users and Non-Users: Perceptions on Safety, Adoption and Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    32. Páraic Carroll, 2022. "Perceptions of Electric Scooters Prior to Legalisation: A Case Study of Dublin, Ireland, the ‘Final Frontier’ of Adopted E-Scooter Use in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2026. "Modeling e-scooter route choices: Infrastructural preferences and intervention scenario analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Dzięcielski, Michał & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Nikitas, Alexandros & Radzimski, Adam, 2025. "Assessing the impacts of free-floating shared micromobility services on docked bike-sharing: Insights from the case studies of Poznań and Brussels," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Kang, Seongmin & Chung, Yongjin & Yang, Byungsoo & Lee, Hyukseong & Lee, Jun & Kim, Jinhee, 2024. "User preference and willingness-to-pay for operation strategies that enhance safety and convenience of E-scooter sharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 31-41.
    4. Nikiforiadis, Andreas & Paschalidis, Evangelos & Stamatiadis, Nikiforos & Paloka, Ntonata & Tsekoura, Eleni & Basbas, Socrates, 2023. "E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    6. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    7. Uemura, Hiroshi & Parady, Giancarlos & Takami, Kiyoshi, 2026. "Analyzing preferences for shared micromobility services in Japanese urban areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Brousseau, Eric & Côme, Etienne & Coulombel, Nicolas & Olave-Cruz, Isac, 2025. "Harmonizing dockless E-scooters: insights from Paris," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Mesa-Garcia, Santiago & Rodriguez-Valencia, Alvaro & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Lleras, Germán, 2026. "Motorcycle ownership and use in Bogotá, Colombia: Unveiling novel factors through a hybrid modelling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Kim, Minju & Zo, Hangjung, 2026. "Impact of shared micro-mobility on local economy: Market sales and regional disparities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    11. Moon, Seol Ah & Shin, Eun Jin, 2025. "Spatial patterns, implementation barriers, and facilitators in Seoul's E-scooter parking corral system: A mixed-methods analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Berg Wincent, Boel & Jenelius, Erik & Burghout, Wilco, 2025. "Shared e-scooter parking regulation: Effects on rider attitudes, perceptions, and use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Wu, Yuhang & Liu, Tao & Du, Bo, 2024. "Fleet sizing and static rebalancing strategies for shared E-scooters: A case study in Indianapolis, USA," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Márquez, Luis & Soto, Jose J., 2021. "Integrating perceptions of safety and bicycle theft risk in the analysis of cycling infrastructure preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 285-301.
    15. Levent Çallı & Büşra Alma Çallı, 2024. "Value‐centric analysis of user adoption for sustainable urban micro‐mobility transportation through shared e‐scooter services," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6408-6433, December.
    16. Barrientos, Manuel & Lavin, Felipe Vasquez & Ponce Oliva, Roberto D., 2020. "Assessing the Incorporation of Latent Variables in the Estimation of the Value of a Statistical Life," EfD Discussion Paper 20-22, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    17. Chan, Tommy Ho-Yin, 2025. "Socio-material perspectives on perceived accessibility of cycling: A sociological inquiry into practices, regulations and informal rules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    18. Shah, Nitesh R. & Ziedan, Abubakr & Brakewood, Candace & Cherry, Christopher R., 2023. "Shared e-scooter service providers with large fleet size have a competitive advantage: Findings from e-scooter demand and supply analysis of Nashville, Tennessee," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Cai, Yangqian & Moreno, Ana Tsui, 2024. "Identifying non-universal heterogeneity of preferences of leisure cyclists for rural highway environments: A latent-class model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Ouvrard, Benjamin & Abildtrup, Jens & Stenger, Anne, 2020. "Nudging Acceptability for Wood Ash Recycling in Forests: A Choice Experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.