IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v195y2025ics0965856425000655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring pedestrian route choice preferences by demographic groups: Analysis of street attributes in Chicago

Author

Listed:
  • Lieu, Seung Jae
  • Guhathakurta, Subhrajit

Abstract

This study examines pedestrian route choice behavior, focusing on how different sociodemographic groups vary in their preferences for street environments by using GPS trajectories collected from smartphone-based travel surveys in Chicago, Illinois. A Path Size Logit Model is used to estimate pedestrians’ preferences for walking in different types of environments. In addition, the trade-off concept is employed to measure the additional distance pedestrians are willing to walk in response to specific street attributes. The results show that pedestrians generally prefer routes with more amenities, parks, and sky visibility but avoid those with many turns and steep slopes. Furthermore, the study provides segmented models based on gender, age, and household income, revealing distinct preferences and aversions to these street features among different demographic groups. While the overarching results align with previous studies, this research contributes significantly to understanding pedestrian route choice decisions by highlighting the diverse behaviors of users. These findings are valuable for urban planners and policymakers, offering guidance in creating pedestrian-friendly environments that cater to the varied needs and preferences of a diverse population.

Suggested Citation

  • Lieu, Seung Jae & Guhathakurta, Subhrajit, 2025. "Exploring pedestrian route choice preferences by demographic groups: Analysis of street attributes in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000655
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000655
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.