Author
Listed:
- Mustafa, Sohaib
- Wang, Qiang
- Jamil, Khalid
- Jie, Ferry
Abstract
AI‑powered autonomous taxis promise to redefine urban mobility, yet consumer acceptance hinges on a nuanced interplay of technological, social, economic, and psychological factors. In this study, we employed a two‑phase, mixed‑method design. Phase1 comprised semi‑structured interviews with 40 Chinese consumers, generating rich thematic insights, such as the critical roles of perceived efficiency, trust in automation, and safety logic, alongside nuanced concerns about infrastructure, cost fairness, and technology anxiety. Phase2 applied an extended UTAUT2 framework using a hybrid PLS‑SEM and ANN approach (n = 764), quantitatively confirming that effort expectancy, trust in technology, and perceived safety are the strongest predictors of intention to use driverless cabs, while user experience, social validation, regulatory support, environmental commitment, and hedonic motivation also exert significant influence. Although facilitating conditions, price value, and technology anxiety did not attain statistical significance, qualitative narratives revealed their complementary relevance in shaping initial perceptions. Integrating both strands, we advance UTAUT2 by embedding context‑specific constructs, such as institutional confidence and ethical decision logic, into its theoretical fabric. Practically, our findings recommend targeted efforts to streamline the booking interface, enhance transparency through public performance dashboards, and leverage government pilot‑lane endorsements to bolster consumer trust. This research delivers a robust empirical foundation for stakeholders aiming to accelerate the uptake of driverless taxi services and contributes a versatile mixed‑method template for future studies in autonomous mobility.
Suggested Citation
Mustafa, Sohaib & Wang, Qiang & Jamil, Khalid & Jie, Ferry, 2026.
"Decoding urban adoption of AI‑driven cabs: a mixed‑method investigation in China,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000315
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104890
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.