IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v71y2022ics0160791x22002445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Taiwan's traditional craft products: A modular product design model of manufacturing technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Tai-Yueh
  • Chang, Wei-Chen
  • Hsieh, Kuo-Jung
  • Chang, Ching-Ter

Abstract

The compatibility between craftsmanship and industrial product design is an important axis of modern design development. This research seeks to integrate the craft process and industrial product design methodology to achieve mass production while maintaining characteristics of traditional craftsmanship. This study constructs an operational model to formulate appropriate strategies, present two craft cases, and utilize the triangulation method to explore synergistic effects between craft process and industrial product design. The conclusions reveal that craft materials, modules, innovation, and living technology are four key design features of the modern craft model. Moreover, this study proposes a new craft development model which applies the module concept to determine feasible market strategies that can be implemented to bridge the gap between craft and product design processes. Importantly, this study also draws upon theories and models proposed by previous researchers to explain how modern craftsmanship can be leveraged to establish market niches for mass-produced products. The concept of modern crafts facilitates cross-domain collaboration and integration, contributes to the field of traditional crafts and product design, and creates niche markets for traditional craft products. This novel approach can therefore be leveraged to advance the development of sustainable design, innovative material use, product recycling, innovative design concepts, and human-friendly design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Tai-Yueh & Chang, Wei-Chen & Hsieh, Kuo-Jung & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Advancing Taiwan's traditional craft products: A modular product design model of manufacturing technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:71:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22002445
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22002445
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Santagata, 2002. "Cultural districts, property rights, and sustainable economic growth," Others 0210004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Walter Santagata, 2002. "Cultural Districts, Property Rights and Sustainable Economic Growth," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 9-23, March.
    3. Michele Gorgoglione & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Umberto Panniello, 2018. "Innovation through tradition in the Italian coffee industry: an analysis of customers’ perceptions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 661-682, July.
    4. Cusumano, Michael A., 1992. "Shifting economies: From craft production to flexible systems and software factories," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 453-480, October.
    5. Fox, Stephen, 2016. "Leapfrog skills: Combining vertical and horizontal multi-skills to overcome skill trade-offs that limit prosperity growth," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 129-139.
    6. Spuzic, S. & Narayanan, R. & Abhary, K. & Adriansen, H.K. & Pignata, S. & Uzunovic, F. & Guang, Xu, 2016. "The synergy of creativity and critical thinking in engineering design: The role of interdisciplinary augmentation and the fine arts," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-7.
    7. Azeem, Muhammad & Ahmed, Munir & Haider, Sajid & Sajjad, Muhammad, 2021. "Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    9. Krishnaswamy, K.N. & Mathirajan, M. & Bala Subrahmanya, M.H., 2014. "Technological innovations and its influence on the growth of auto component SMEs of Bangalore: A case study approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 18-31.
    10. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Tommaso Savino, 2015. "Reinterpreting Tradition to Innovate: The Case of Italian Haute Cuisine," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 677-702, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgiev, Georgi V. & Georgiev, Danko D., 2023. "Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luciana Lazzeretti & Rafael Boix & Francesco Capone, 2009. "Why do creative industries cluster? An analysis of the determinants of clustering of creative industries," Institut Metròpoli Working Paper in economics 0902, Institut Metròpoli.
    2. Tiziana Cuccia, 2012. "Is it worth being inscribed in the world heritage list? A case study of �The Baroque cities in Val di Noto� (Sicily)," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 66(2), pages 169-190.
    3. Friel Martha & Santagata Walter, 2007. "Make Material Cultural Heritage Work," EBLA Working Papers 200710, University of Turin.
    4. Bucci, Alberto & Segre, Giovanna, 2011. "Culture and human capital in a two-sector endogenous growth model," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 279-293, December.
    5. Riccardo, Borgoni & Alessandra, Michelangeli & Nicola, Pontarollo, 2016. "How Does a City Benefit from Culture? Evidence from Milan," Working Papers 335, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised 16 May 2016.
    6. repec:pri:cpanda:wp21%20-%20tepper is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lei Xiong & Cheng-Lein Teng & Bo-Wei Zhu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2017. "Using the D-DANP-mV Model to Explore the Continuous System Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Creative Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-37, October.
    8. Steven J? Tepper, 2002. "Creative Assets and the Changing Economy," Working Papers 43, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    9. Marco Guerzoni & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2014. "Music consumption at the dawn of the music industry: the rise of a cultural fad," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(2), pages 145-171, May.
    10. Clara Bocchino & Michael Murphree, 2012. "Overlapping Cultural Commons and Districts in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Aldo Buzio & Alessio Re, 2012. "Cultural Commons and New Concepts in UNESCO World Heritage Sites Recognition and Management," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Arnaboldi, Michela & Spiller, Nicola, 2011. "Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of Cultural Districts," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 641-654.
    13. Chilese Erica & Russo Antonio Paolo, 2009. "Urban fashion policies: lessons from the Barcelona catwalks," EBLA Working Papers 200803, University of Turin.
    14. Antonio Russo & Alan Quaglieri Domínguez, 2011. "Creative workers and regional development. Towards a classification of spatial effects," ERSA conference papers ersa11p65, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp & João Romão, 2019. "Cultural Heritage Appraisal by Visitors to Global Cities: The Use of Social Media and Urban Analytics in Urban Buzz Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Marco Bellandi & Daniela Campus & Alessandro Carraro & Erica Santini, 2020. "Accumulation of cultural capital at the intersection of socio-demographic features and productive specializations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(1), pages 1-34, March.
    17. Christian Barrère, 2016. "Cultural heritages: From official to informal [Patrimoines culturels : des patrimoines officiels aux patrimoines informels]," Post-Print hal-02569029, HAL.
    18. Christian Barrère, 2014. "Les quatre temps du patrimoine," Post-Print hal-02614191, HAL.
    19. Allen J Scott, 2005. "Cultural-Products Industries And Urban Economic Development: Prospects For Growth And Market Contestation In Global Context," Urban/Regional 0511005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Frey, Bruno S. & Meier, Stephan, 2006. "The Economics of Museums," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 29, pages 1017-1047, Elsevier.
    21. Hung, Chi-Sen, 2022. "A study of local government strategies to promote youth entrepreneurial clusters in cultural and creative industries," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(1), pages 54-67.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:71:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22002445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.