IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v38y2014icp18-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological innovations and its influence on the growth of auto component SMEs of Bangalore: A case study approach

Author

Listed:
  • Krishnaswamy, K.N.
  • Mathirajan, M.
  • Bala Subrahmanya, M.H.

Abstract

This paper describes the nature and dimensions of technological innovations leading to the development and introduction of new products and market expansion along with enterprise growth with reference to three auto component SMEs of Bangalore in India. The study brings out that the entrepreneurs played an instrumental role in recognizing market opportunities, building up crucial in-house technological capability, supplement it with appropriate external assistance to carry out technological innovations including its modifications to suit customer requirements and finally deliver it to the market. An important feature of these innovations is that constant interaction with its customers is in-built into the system. As a result, all the three SMEs could achieve successful product innovations which led to their gradual growth over time in terms of employment, investment and more importantly in terms of sales turnover. Further, by stringing the inferences of the three cases a theoretical construct of the growth of innovations in SMEs in three stages of their development – start-up and stabilizing, building technological credibility and opening up of new markets – is proposed. These stages are (i) attaining design standards, (ii) incremental innovations, and (iii) ushering radical innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishnaswamy, K.N. & Mathirajan, M. & Bala Subrahmanya, M.H., 2014. "Technological innovations and its influence on the growth of auto component SMEs of Bangalore: A case study approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 18-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:18-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1400013X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coad, Alex & Rao, Rekha, 2008. "Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 633-648, May.
    2. World Bank, 2010. "Innovation Policy : A Guide for Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2460, December.
    3. Coombs, R. & Narandren, P. & Richards, A., 1996. "A literature-based innovation output indicator," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 403-413, May.
    4. Rick Delbridge & Tim Edwards & Max Munday, 2001. "Linking Innovative Potential to SME Performance: An Assessment of Enterprises in Industrial South Wales," ERSA conference papers ersa01p135, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilong An & Yinghua Zhang, 2021. "Crossing the Valley of Death for SMEs: Management Practices From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    2. Chen, Tai-Yueh & Chang, Wei-Chen & Hsieh, Kuo-Jung & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Advancing Taiwan's traditional craft products: A modular product design model of manufacturing technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Innovation Capability in Manufacturing Companies Operating in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee, 2016. "Challenges for China's banks: Investment policies to support technology-based start-ups," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 49-57.
    5. Nina Su & Zhuqin Shi & Xianqi Zhu & Yunsheng Xin, 2021. "An Evolutionary Game Model of Collaborative Innovation Between Enterprises and Colleges Under Government Participation of China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    6. Sonal Khurana & Sunil Luthra & Abid Haleem & Anil Kumar & Bisma Mannan, 2022. "Can sustainability be achieved through sustainable oriented innovation practices? Empirical evidence of micro, small and medium scale manufacturing enterprises," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1591-1615, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bala Subrahmanya, M. H. & Mathirajan, M. & Krishnaswamy, K. N., 2010. "Importance of Technological Innovation for SME Growth - Evidence from India," MERIT Working Papers 007, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Teemu Makkonen & Robert P. Have, 2013. "Benchmarking regional innovative performance: composite measures and direct innovation counts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 247-262, January.
    3. Bala Subrahmanya, M. H. & Mathirajan, M. & Krishnaswamy, K. N., 2010. "Importance of Technological Innovation for SME Growth - Evidence from India," MERIT Working Papers 2010-007, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Cowling, Marc & Ughetto, Elisa & Lee, Neil, 2018. "The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 166-176.
    5. Dimelis, Sophia & Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Louri, Helen, 2015. "Can firms grow without credit?: evidence from the Euro Area, 2005-2011: a quantile panel analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61157, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ullah, Barkat, 2021. "Does innovation explain the performance gap between privatized and private firms?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Keun-Seob Choi & Jeong-Dong Lee & Chulwoo Baek, 2016. "Growth of De Alio and De Novo firms in the new and renewable energy industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 295-312, May.
    8. Z. Jun Lin & Shengqiang Liu & Fangcheng Sun, 2017. "The Impact of Financing Constraints and Agency Costs on Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 3-42, March.
    9. Li, Mingxiang, 2021. "Exploring novel technologies through board interlocks: Spillover vs. broad exploration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    10. Tether, B. S., 1998. "Small and large firms: sources of unequal innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 725-745, November.
    11. -, 2017. "La Encuesta Nacional de Dinámica de Empleo e Innovación (ENDEI) como herramienta de análisis: la innovación y el empleo en la industria manufacturera argentina," Documentos de Proyectos 42490, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Fougère, D. & Golfier, C. & Horny, G. & Kremp, E., 2013. "What has been the impact of the 2008 crisis on firms’ default? (in French)," Working papers 463, Banque de France.
    13. Emma Tredgett & Alex Coad, 2015. "The shaky start of the UK Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI) in Comparison to the US Small Business Innovation Research Programme (SBIR)," Management Working Papers 10, Birkbeck Department of Management, revised Jun 2015.
    14. Stefano Bianchini & Giulio Bottazzi & Federico Tamagni, 2017. "What does (not) characterize persistent corporate high-growth?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 633-656, March.
    15. Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 277-305.
    16. Alex Coad & Agustí Segarra-Blasco & Mercedes Teruel, 2021. "A bit of basic, a bit of applied? R&D strategies and firm performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1758-1783, December.
    17. Lakitan, Benyamin, 2013. "Connecting all the dots: Identifying the “actor level” challenges in establishing effective innovation system in Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-54.
    18. Cassini, Lorenzo & Robert, Verónica, 2017. "Oportunidad versus complejidad en los procesos de aprendizaje: criterios para clasificación de sectores según los atributos de los regímenes sectoriales de innovación," Documentos de Proyectos 44135, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Bedford, Anna & Ma, Le & Ma, Nelson & Vojvoda, Kristina, 2022. "Australian innovation: Patent database construction and first evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Hassan Arabshahi & Hamed Fazlollahtabar, 2018. "Classifying Innovative Activities Using Decision Tree and Gini Index," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:18-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.