IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v215y2025ics0040162525001271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with blame in digital ecosystems: The DAO failure in the Ethereum blockchain

Author

Listed:
  • Ungureanu, Paula
  • Bellesia, Francesca
  • Cochis, Carlotta

Abstract

This study investigates an emblematic case of innovation failure in blockchains as to understand how turbulent episodes of innovation failure shape the socio-technical organization of digital ecosystems. The Decentralized Autonomous Organization (The DAO) was an alternative model of organizational governance based on the Ethereum blockchain which registered one of the biggest successes in crowdfunding history and fell victim to one of the biggest hacks of the crypto world. Our empirical qualitative study combines interviews, archival and social media data to develop a grounded theory on how innovation failure was framed and dealt with in the Ethereum ecosystem. Our findings highlight the key role of blaming processes following innovation failures in digital ecosystems. Building on blame theory, we theorize about the interplay between human and technological blaming, and document a process called multi-distributed blaming whereby actors circle between multiple blames to an ecosystem's human and technological components, with multi-level (i.e., organizational and technological) consequences for the ecosystem. By adopting a socio-technical perspective, our findings contribute to blame theories, to the literature on digital ecosystems and to the scant research on blockchain organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ungureanu, Paula & Bellesia, Francesca & Cochis, Carlotta, 2025. "Dealing with blame in digital ecosystems: The DAO failure in the Ethereum blockchain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525001271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525001271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.