IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v215y2025ics0040162525000782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights into ChatGPT adoption (or resistance) in research practices: The behavioral reasoning perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad Usman
  • Ashraf, Aqsa
  • Yuan, Jingbo
  • Al-Waqfi, Mohammed

Abstract

The widespread and rapidly increasing usage of ChatGPT in education and research has attracted a considerable attention and controversies. Although its application has several benefits, various potential negative impacts and risks exist. To this end, drawing on the insights from the Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT), this study aims to investigate the factors that influence ChatGPT's adoption (or resistance) in research practices. We employed an exploratory qualitative research design and conducted semi-structured interviews with academic researchers to identify the reasons for and against the use of ChatGPT. The interview participants were purposefully selected management researchers with appropriate knowledge and experience of ChatGPT, who supervise research students and are actively publishing their research. We delineated themes and subthemes that emerged from the interviews to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence the adoption (or resistance) of ChatGPT. This study contributes to the literature by extending the application of BRT in academic research and highlight the reasons for (and against) the adoption of ChatGPT among academic researchers. Moreover, these findings inform policy and practice to develop appropriate strategies for promoting ethical and responsible AI adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad Usman & Ashraf, Aqsa & Yuan, Jingbo & Al-Waqfi, Mohammed, 2025. "Insights into ChatGPT adoption (or resistance) in research practices: The behavioral reasoning perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:215:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.