IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-025-00754-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Schryen

    (Paderborn University)

  • Mauricio Marrone

    (Macquarie University)

  • Jiaqi Yang

    (Macquarie University
    UNSW Sydney)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the way research is conducted, particularly through generative AI (GenAI) tools which can enhance written communication and foster innovation via knowledge development. This study focuses on the latter, examining the role of GenAI in specific knowledge development activities within literature reviews. Through an epistemological lens, we distinguish six key knowledge development activities: research synthesis, evidence aggregation, critique, theory building, research gap identification, and research agenda development. Our analysis demonstrates both the capabilities and limitations of GenAI in supporting these activities, highlighting how GenAI can assist in synthesizing previous work, discovering and integrating concepts, and advancing various knowledge domains. We emphasize a human-centered, synergistic approach where GenAI complements researchers’ efforts, rather than replacing them. Additionally, our activity-centric analysis provides insights into how different types of literature reviews can effectively benefit from GenAI support, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of AI integration in information systems research.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Schryen & Mauricio Marrone & Jiaqi Yang, 2025. "Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00754-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brady D. Lund & Ting Wang & Nishith Reddy Mannuru & Bing Nie & Somipam Shimray & Ziang Wang, 2023. "ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(5), pages 570-581, May.
    2. Guido Schryen, 2013. "Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 139-169, March.
    3. Schryen, Guido & Wagner, Gerit & Benlian, Alexander & Paré, Guy, 2020. "A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 115532, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Holly Else, 2023. "Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7944), pages 423-423, January.
    5. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    6. Eva A. M. van Dis & Johan Bollen & Willem Zuidema & Robert van Rooij & Claudi L. Bockting, 2023. "ChatGPT: five priorities for research," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7947), pages 224-226, February.
    7. Frantz Rowe, 2014. "What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 241-255, May.
    8. J. J. Po-An Hsieh & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2011. "Extracting Business Value from IT: A Sensemaking Perspective of Post-Adoptive Use," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(11), pages 2018-2039, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li-Yuan Huang & Xun Zhang & Qiang Wang & Zhen-Song Chen & Yang Liu, 2024. "Evaluating Media Knowledge Capabilities of Intelligent Search Dialogue Systems: A Case Study of ChatGPT and New Bing," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17284-17307, December.
    2. Raghu Raman & Hiran H Lathabai & Santanu Mandal & Payel Das & Tavleen Kaur & Prema Nedungadi, 2024. "ChatGPT: Literate or intelligent about UN sustainable development goals?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Stefan Schweikl & Robert Obermaier, 2023. "Lost in translation: IT business value research and resource complementarity—an integrative framework, shortcomings and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1713-1749, December.
    4. Peres, Renana & Schreier, Martin & Schweidel, David & Sorescu, Alina, 2023. "On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 269-275.
    5. Kwahk, Kee-Young & Ahn, Hyunchul & Ryu, Young U., 2018. "Understanding mandatory IS use behavior: How outcome expectations affect conative IS use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-76.
    6. Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on twitter data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    8. Alin ZAMFIROIU & Denisa VASILE & Daniel SAVU, 2023. "ChatGPT – A Systematic Review of Published Research Papers," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(1), pages 5-16.
    9. Kuldip Singh & Elizabeth Caroline Agustine & Nur Farhani Binti Samasu & Nur Aida Binti Kipli, 2024. "Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT: A Study of Public University in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 1387-1397, November.
    10. Talaei-Khoei, Amir & Yang, Alan T. & Masialeti, Masialeti, 2024. "How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Ali, Omar & Murray, Peter A. & Momin, Mujtaba & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Malik, Tegwen, 2024. "The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Chiarello, Filippo & Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Barandoni, Simone & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "Future applications of generative large language models: A data-driven case study on ChatGPT," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    14. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    15. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    16. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    17. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    18. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    19. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    20. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Generative AI; Literature reviews; Knowledge development; Innovation goal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00754-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.