IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v33y2023i1d10.1007_s12525-023-00639-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Thorsten Schoormann

    (University of Hildesheim
    Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering)

  • Julia Schweihoff

    (TU Dortmund University)

  • Ilka Jussen

    (TU Dortmund University)

  • Frederik Möller

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering
    TU Dortmund University
    TU Braunschweig)

Abstract

To sustain competitive advantage in dynamic business environments, organizations have to constantly adapt, innovate, and recombine their business models. As some configurations of business model design options are more successful than others, it is crucial to have a holistic understanding of the (current) solution space of those options and their dependencies. To be aware of and manage the set of possible design options, one can rely on classification tools, including taxonomies, typologies, and classification schemes. Given the availability of several tool types, different underlying assumptions for each type need to be considered when designing and applying a tool. Following a descriptive literature review approach, this paper structures the diverse body of classification research by presenting a repository of tools and deriving an analytical grid to disclose the similarities and differences between selected tool types. Thereby, this paper (1) raises awareness for the plurality of tools and their underpinning concepts, (2) provides a status quo overview across tool types, and (3) derives design-relevant knowledge for the tools, points to current challenges, and paves the ground for future research on the building, evaluation, and use of this class of tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00639-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-023-00639-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-023-00639-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-023-00639-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dar:wpaper:63687 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Adamantia G Pateli & George M Giaglis, 2004. "A research framework for analysing eBusiness models," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 302-314, December.
    3. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    4. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Feng Zhu, 2010. "Strategies to Fight Ad-Sponsored Rivals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(9), pages 1484-1499, September.
    5. Martin J. Eppler & Friederike Hoffmann & Sabrina Bresciani, 2011. "New Business Models Through Collaborative Idea Generation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1323-1341.
    6. repec:dar:wpaper:64420 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Mathieu Templier & Guy Paré, 2018. "Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 503-550, September.
    8. Rainer Alt, 2020. "Electronic Markets on business model development," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 405-411, September.
    9. Michael Weber & Moritz Beutter & Jörg Weking & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2022. "AI Startup Business Models," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(1), pages 91-109, February.
    10. Harry Bouwman & Mark Reuver & Marikka Heikkilä & Erwin Fielt, 2020. "Business model tooling: where research and practice meet," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 413-419, September.
    11. Daniel Szopinski & Thorsten Schoormann & Thomas John & Ralf Knackstedt & Dennis Kundisch, 2020. "Software tools for business model innovation: current state and future challenges," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 469-494, September.
    12. Henner Gimpel & Daniel Rau & Maximilian Röglinger, 2018. "Understanding FinTech start-ups – a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 245-264, August.
    13. Schryen, Guido & Wagner, Gerit & Benlian, Alexander & Paré, Guy, 2020. "A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 115532, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    14. Omar A. El Sawy & Arvind Malhotra & YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 835-848, December.
    15. Veit, Daniel J. & Clemons, Eric K. & Benlian, Alexander & Buxmann, Peter & Hess, Thomas & Kundisch, D. & Leimeister, Jan Marco & Loos, Peter & Spann, Martin, 2014. "Business Models – an Information Systems Research Agenda," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 62747, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Robert C Nickerson & Upkar Varshney & Jan Muntermann, 2013. "A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 336-359, May.
    17. Sabrina Schneider & Patrick Spieth, 2013. "Business Model Innovation: Towards An Integrated Future Research Agenda," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thorsten Schoormann & Maren Stadtländer & Ralf Knackstedt, 2022. "Designing business model development tools for sustainability—a design science study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 645-667, June.
    2. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    3. Daniel Szopinski & Thorsten Schoormann & Thomas John & Ralf Knackstedt & Dennis Kundisch, 2020. "Software tools for business model innovation: current state and future challenges," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 469-494, September.
    4. Frederik Möller & Maleen Stachon & Can Azkan & Thorsten Schoormann & Boris Otto, 2022. "Designing business model taxonomies – synthesis and guidance from information systems research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 701-726, June.
    5. Dotun Olaleye Faloye & Idowu Owoeye & Kunle Jayeola, 2021. "The Key Drivers of Business Model Innovation in Developing Countries’ Firms: Survey of Micro and Small Scale Enterprises in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(7), pages 148-157, July.
    6. Oana Buliga & Christian W. Scheiner & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2016. "Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 647-670, August.
    7. Daniela Andreini & Cristina Bettinelli & Nicolai J. Foss & Marco Mismetti, 2022. "Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1089-1121, December.
    8. Deon Montasser & Ruslan Prijadi & Tengku Ezni Balqiah, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Readiness on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Digital Business Model Innovation: Evidence From Indone," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    9. Jens Passlick & Lukas Grützner & Michael Schulz & Michael H. Breitner, 2023. "Self-service business intelligence and analytics application scenarios: A taxonomy for differentiation," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 159-191, March.
    10. Bogdan Wit & Piotr Dresler, 2021. "Exploratory Studies of the Business Model Canvas - Differences in the Visualizations of the Business Model," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 695-705.
    11. Elias G. Carayannis & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Dimitra Stamati, 2017. "Re-visiting BMI as an Enabler of Strategic Intent and Organizational Resilience, Robustness, and Remunerativeness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 407-436, June.
    12. Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 829-872, June.
    13. Rainer Alt, 2020. "Electronic Markets on sustainability," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 667-674, December.
    14. Henning Breuer & Florian Lüdeke-Freund, 2017. "Values-Based Network And Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-35, April.
    15. Harry Bouwman & Mark Reuver & Marikka Heikkilä & Erwin Fielt, 2020. "Business model tooling: where research and practice meet," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 413-419, September.
    16. Michael Barrett & Eivor Oborn & Wanda Orlikowski, 2016. "Creating Value in Online Communities: The Sociomaterial Configuring of Strategy, Platform, and Stakeholder Engagement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 704-723, December.
    17. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mohammad Mehrabioun & Kambiz Badie & Jahanyar Bamdad Soofi, 2018. "A Systemic Framework for Business Model Design and Development -Part A: Theorizing Perspective," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 437-461, August.
    18. Rainer Alt, 2020. "Electronic Markets on business model development," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 405-411, September.
    19. Oliver Werth & Davinia Rodríguez Cardona & Albert Torno & Michael H. Breitner & Jan Muntermann, 2023. "What determines FinTech success?—A taxonomy-based analysis of FinTech success factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION AND SMEs PERFORMANCE — DOES COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE MEDIATE?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-31, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business model; Taxonomy; Typology; Classification; Design options;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:33:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-023-00639-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.