IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0297521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ChatGPT: Literate or intelligent about UN sustainable development goals?

Author

Listed:
  • Raghu Raman
  • Hiran H Lathabai
  • Santanu Mandal
  • Payel Das
  • Tavleen Kaur
  • Prema Nedungadi

Abstract

Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, are progressively transforming numerous sectors, demonstrating a capacity to impact human life dramatically. This research seeks to evaluate the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) literacy of ChatGPT, which is crucial for diverse stakeholders involved in SDG-related policies. Experimental outcomes from two widely used Sustainability Assessment tests–the UN SDG Fitness Test and Sustainability Literacy Test (SULITEST) ‐ suggest that ChatGPT exhibits high SDG literacy, yet its comprehensive SDG intelligence needs further exploration. The Fitness Test gauges eight vital competencies across introductory, intermediate, and advanced levels. Accurate mapping of these to the test questions is essential for partial evaluation of SDG intelligence. To assess SDG intelligence, the questions from both tests were mapped to 17 SDGs and eight cross-cutting SDG core competencies, but both test questionnaires were found to be insufficient. SULITEST could satisfactorily map only 5 out of 8 competencies, whereas the Fitness Test managed to map 6 out of 8. Regarding the coverage of the Fitness Test and SULITEST, their mapping to the 17 SDGs, both tests fell short. Most SDGs were underrepresented in both instruments, with certain SDGs not represented at all. Consequently, both tools proved ineffective in assessing SDG intelligence through SDG coverage. The study recommends future versions of ChatGPT to enhance competencies such as collaboration, critical thinking, systems thinking, and others to achieve the SDGs. It concludes that while AI models like ChatGPT hold considerable potential in sustainable development, their usage must be approached carefully, considering current limitations and ethical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghu Raman & Hiran H Lathabai & Santanu Mandal & Payel Das & Tavleen Kaur & Prema Nedungadi, 2024. "ChatGPT: Literate or intelligent about UN sustainable development goals?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297521
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297521
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297521&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0297521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoran Latinovic & Sharmila C. Chatterjee, 2022. "Achieving the promise of AI and ML in delivering economic and relational customer value in B2B," Post-Print hal-04717609, HAL.
    2. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Hassan, Rohail & Escobar, Octavio, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 283-314.
    3. Colin Kuehl & Aaron C. Sparks & Heather Hodges & Eric R. A. N. Smith, 2021. "The incoherence of sustainability literacy assessed with the Sulitest," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 555-560, June.
    4. Holly Else, 2023. "Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7944), pages 423-423, January.
    5. Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2023. "ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Eva A. M. van Dis & Johan Bollen & Willem Zuidema & Robert van Rooij & Claudi L. Bockting, 2023. "ChatGPT: five priorities for research," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7947), pages 224-226, February.
    7. Ricardo Vinuesa & Hossein Azizpour & Iolanda Leite & Madeline Balaam & Virginia Dignum & Sami Domisch & Anna Felländer & Simone Daniela Langhans & Max Tegmark & Francesco Fuso Nerini, 2020. "The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Latinovic, Zoran & Chatterjee, Sharmila C., 2022. "Achieving the promise of AI and ML in delivering economic and relational customer value in B2B," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 966-974.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li-Yuan Huang & Xun Zhang & Qiang Wang & Zhen-Song Chen & Yang Liu, 2024. "Evaluating Media Knowledge Capabilities of Intelligent Search Dialogue Systems: A Case Study of ChatGPT and New Bing," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17284-17307, December.
    2. Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on twitter data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Alin ZAMFIROIU & Denisa VASILE & Daniel SAVU, 2023. "ChatGPT – A Systematic Review of Published Research Papers," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(1), pages 5-16.
    6. Stefano Bianchini & Giacomo Damioli & Claudia Ghisetti, 2023. "The environmental effects of the “twin” green and digital transition in European regions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(4), pages 877-918, April.
    7. Basma Hamrouni & Abdelhabib Bourouis & Ahmed Korichi & Mohsen Brahmi, 2021. "Explainable Ontology-Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Business Model Design and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Guido Schryen & Mauricio Marrone & Jiaqi Yang, 2025. "Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Amina Badreddine & Hadjira Larbi Cherif, 2023. "ChatGPT in Academic Research: Demonstrating Limitations through Real Practical Examples," Post-Print hal-04379581, HAL.
    10. David Mhlanga, 2022. "Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: The Superlative Approach to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Kwabena Abrokwah-Larbi, 2024. "The nexus between customer value analytics and SME performance in emerging market: a resource-based view perspective," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Denicolai, Stefano & Zucchella, Antonella & Magnani, Giovanna, 2021. "Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Wu, Qinqin & Zhuang, Qinqin & Liu, Yitong & Han, Longyan, 2024. "Technology shock of ChatGPT, social attention and firm value: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Peres, Renana & Schreier, Martin & Schweidel, David & Sorescu, Alina, 2023. "On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 269-275.
    15. Herhausen, Dennis & Bernritter, Stefan F. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Kumar, Ajay & Delen, Dursun, 2024. "Machine learning in marketing: Recent progress and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Steve J. Bickley & Benno Torgler, 2021. "Behavioural Economics, What Have we Missed? Exploring “Classical” Behavioural Economics Roots in AI, Cognitive Psychology, and Complexity Theory," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-21, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Chiarello, Filippo & Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Barandoni, Simone & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "Future applications of generative large language models: A data-driven case study on ChatGPT," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Feng, Jianghong & Ning, Yu & Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Guo & Xiu Xu, Su, 2024. "ChatGPT-enabled two-stage auctions for electric vehicle battery recycling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Isensee, Carmen & Griese, Kai-Michael & Teuteberg, Frank, 2022. "Sustainable Artificial Intelligence im Marketing am Beispiel des SDG 12," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 7(01/2022), pages 33-46.
    20. Diane A. Isabelle & Mika Westerlund, 2022. "A Review and Categorization of Artificial Intelligence-Based Opportunities in Wildlife, Ocean and Land Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.