IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i9p1005-d1650112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Determinants of and Barriers to Climate-Smart Agricultural Technologies Adoption in Chinese Cooperatives: A Hybrid Study

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxue Feng

    (Department of Decision Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Jun Chen

    (Department of Decision Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Zebing Mao

    (Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan)

  • Yanhong Peng

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Suhaiza Zailani

    (Ungku Aziz Centre, Department of Decision Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

Abstract

The loss of agricultural production due to climate change and natural disasters has attracted widespread attention. Climate-smart agricultural technologies (CSATs) are attracting attention as a solution to address climate change while achieving sustainable agricultural development. However, in the Chinese context, research on cooperatives’ intention to adopt such technologies is relatively limited. This study investigated the factors influencing the behavioral intentions of Chinese farmers’ cooperatives to adopt CSATs using a behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) framework. A structured questionnaire was administered to 308 participants using purposive sampling techniques. For data analysis, an artificial neural network (ANN) and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) complemented the disjointed two-stage partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach to ensure the robustness of the results and provide important practical insights. The results suggest that values (perceived value of government environmental concern, value of openness to change) shape the determinants of and barriers to CSAT adoption by cooperatives, but do not have a direct impact on behavioral intentions. The “determinants” all positively influenced adoption behavioral intentions, with “agricultural extension and advisory service” having the greatest impact on behavioral intentions, followed by “opinion leaders’ recommendation” and “policy support”. Among the “barriers”, only “perceived risk” and behavioral intention were negatively correlated. Behavioral intention to adopt CSATs by cooperatives has a positive effect on willingness to pay, which motivated cooperatives to pay more to acquire the technology. Based on the findings, this study provides theoretical insights for researchers and policy implications for governments, agricultural organizations, policymakers, and agri-technology companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxue Feng & Jun Chen & Zebing Mao & Yanhong Peng & Suhaiza Zailani, 2025. "Exploring Determinants of and Barriers to Climate-Smart Agricultural Technologies Adoption in Chinese Cooperatives: A Hybrid Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:1005-:d:1650112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/9/1005/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/9/1005/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodrose Sisay & Kindie Tesfaye & Mengistu Ketema & Nigussie Dechassa & Mezegebu Getnet, 2023. "Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies and Determinants of Farmers’ Adoption Decisions in the Great Rift Valley of Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Sahu, Aditya Kumar & Padhy, R.K. & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Envisioning the future of behavioral decision-making: A systematic literature review of behavioral reasoning theory," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 145-159.
    3. Julián F. Becerra-Encinales & Paloma Bernal-Hernandez & Jorge A. Beltrán-Giraldo & Alexandre P. Cooman & Luis H. Reyes & Juan C. Cruz, 2024. "Agricultural Extension for Adopting Technological Practices in Developing Countries: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Nuray Cakirli Akyüz & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2020. "The Impact of Behavioral Drivers on Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The Case of Organic Farming in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    5. De Xia & Wenhua Chen & Qinglu Gao & Rui Zhang & Yundong Zhang, 2021. "Research on Enterprises’ Intention to Adopt Green Technology Imposed by Environmental Regulations with Perspective of State Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Westaby, James D., 2005. "Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 97-120, November.
    7. Marilena Gemtou & Konstantina Kakkavou & Evangelos Anastasiou & Spyros Fountas & Soren Marcus Pedersen & Gohar Isakhanyan & Kassa Tarekegn Erekalo & Serafin Pazos-Vidal, 2024. "Farmers’ Transition to Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Review of the Decision-Making Factors Affecting Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, March.
    8. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2012. "Technology Adoption with Uncertain Future Costs and Quality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 262-274, April.
    9. Wei Li & Yoon Fah Lay, 2024. "Examining the reliability and validity of measuring scales related to informatization and instructional leadership using the PLS-SEM approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 12(3), pages 461-480.
    10. Bowen Wang & Desheng Hu & Diandian Hao & Meng Li & Yanan Wang, 2021. "Influence of Government Information on Farmers’ Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance: Mediating Effect Analysis Based on Moderation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Naman Sreen & Swetarupa Chatterjee & Seema Bhardwaj & Asmita Chitnis, 2023. "Reasons and intuitions: extending behavioural reasoning theory to determine green purchase behavior," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 447-475, June.
    12. Hafiza Sobia Tufail & Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Amnah Mohammed Alsuhaibani & Sidra Ramzan & Ahmad Usman Shahid & Moamen S. Refat, 2022. "Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Suboptimal Food Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory: A Food Waste Reduction Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Granado-Díaz, Rubén & Colombo, Sergio & Romero-Varo, Marina & Villanueva, Anastasio J., 2024. "Farmers' attitudes toward the use of digital technologies in the context of agri-environmental policies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Zhang, Zhixin, 2022. "Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    15. Xiaoxue Feng & Suhaiza Zailani, 2024. "The Antecedents of the Willingness to Adopt and Pay for Climate-Smart Agricultural Technology Among Cooperatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-31, December.
    16. Yan Shi & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Guangwen Zheng & Muhammad Hamayun & Abdullah Mohammed Ibrahim, 2022. "The Antecedents of Willingness to Adopt and Pay for the IoT in the Agricultural Industry: An Application of the UTAUT 2 Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Haibo Ruan & Li Qiu & Jun Chen & Shuo Liu & Zhiyuan Ma, 2022. "Government Trust, Environmental Pollution Perception, and Environmental Governance Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Wanglin Ma & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2024. "Climate-smart agriculture: adoption, impacts, and implications for sustainable development," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1-23, June.
    19. David J. Frame & Suzanne M. Rosier & Ilan Noy & Luke J. Harrington & Trevor Carey-Smith & Sarah N. Sparrow & Dáithí A. Stone & Samuel M. Dean, 2020. "Climate change attribution and the economic costs of extreme weather events: a study on damages from extreme rainfall and drought," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 781-797, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoxue Feng & Suhaiza Zailani, 2024. "The Antecedents of the Willingness to Adopt and Pay for Climate-Smart Agricultural Technology Among Cooperatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Sarah Zafar & Saeed Badghish & Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Muhammad Zafar Yaqub, 2023. "The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad Usman & Ashraf, Aqsa & Yuan, Jingbo & Al-Waqfi, Mohammed, 2025. "Insights into ChatGPT adoption (or resistance) in research practices: The behavioral reasoning perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Yadav, Rambalak & Giri, Arunangshu & Chatterjee, Satakshi, 2022. "Understanding the users' motivation and barriers in adopting healthcare apps: A mixed-method approach using behavioral reasoning theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Elizabeth Kempen & Lorna Christie, 2022. "Designing to Attract in an Emerging Market: Applying Behavioural Reasoning Theory to South African Consumer Reactions to an Ultra-High Temperature Milk Product Line Extension," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(14), pages 4-21.
    6. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Attri, Rekha & Salam, Mohammad Asif & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2025. "Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Shahzad, Khuram & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Basahel, Sarah, 2024. "Is the future of the metaverse bleak or bright? Role of realism, facilitators, and inhibitors in metaverse adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shahzad, Mohsin & Shahzad, Khuram & Appolloni, Andrea & Elgammal, Islam, 2024. "Gamification and sustainable development: Role of gamified learning in sustainable purchasing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Muhammad Zeeshan Zafar & Adnan Maqbool & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Shahjahan Masud, 2021. "Accentuating the Interrelation between Consumer Intention and Healthy Packaged Food Selection during COVID-19: A Case Study of Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Yadav, Rambalak & Bilgihan, Anil & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "What drives diners' eco-friendly behaviour? The moderating role of planning routine," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Jan, Ihsan Ullah & Ji, Seonggoo & Kim, Changju, 2023. "What (de) motivates customers to use AI-powered conversational agents for shopping? The extended behavioral reasoning perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Nadeem, Waqar & Ashraf, Abdul Rehman & Shahid, Shadma, 2025. "What drives metaverse retail environments (non)usage? A behavioral reasoning theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Rakshit, Sandip & Islam, Nazrul & Mondal, Sandeep & Paul, Tripti, 2022. "An integrated social network marketing metric for business-to-business SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 73-88.
    14. Shahzad, Muhammad Faisal & Yuan, Jingbo & Shahzad, Khuram, 2024. "Elevating culinary skies: Unveiling hygiene motivations, environmental trust, and market performance in drone food delivery adoption in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Saubhagya Bhalla, 2021. "Testing the Motivations and Constraints of Collaborative Consumption: An Empirical Analysis of Disruptive Innovative Business Model," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 146-157, June.
    16. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Nguyen, Nguyen An Ngoc & Tran, Phuong Thi Kim & Pham, Huong-Giang & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2023. "The influence of environmental concerns and psychosocial factors on electric motorbike switching intention in the global south," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    17. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Chen, Ching-Fu & Eccarius, Timo & Su, Pin-Chi, 2021. "The role of environmental concern in forming intentions for switching to electric scooters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 129-144.
    19. Sreen, Naman & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Tan, Teck Ming & Alharbi, Fatimah, 2021. "Behavioral reasoning perspectives to brand love toward natural products: Moderating role of environmental concern and household size," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    20. Yang, Feifan & Chu, Rongwei & Cai, Yahua & Chen, Zhijun, 2022. "Breadwinning: Migrant workers’ family motivation in facing life-threatening events and its performance implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 491-502.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:1005-:d:1650112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.