IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v208y2024ics0040162524005079.html

Exploring the individual adoption of human resource analytics: Behavioural beliefs and the role of machine learning characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Hülter, Svenja M.
  • Ertel, Christian
  • Heidemann, Ansgar

Abstract

The technological capabilities of Human Resource Analytics (HRA), enhanced by recent innovations in Machine Learning (ML), offer exciting opportunities. However, organisations often fail to realise these potentials because of a limited understanding of why individuals choose to adopt or disregard respective tools. Prior research on innovation adoption offers preliminary insights but fails to aggregate the determinants of individual adoption into actionable suggestions for decisions in the ML adoption process. Our study applies focused interviews to examine non-ML experts' reasoning for using a specific tool tailored to a public sector organisation, which corresponds to the usual end-user perspective of ML-based HRA adoption. By drawing from the HRA adoption framework, provided by Vargas et al. (2018), we contribute to the literature by identifying relevant beliefs and experiences influencing one's intention to adopt ML-based HRA and by qualitatively linking these beliefs to ML characteristics such as transparency, automation and fairness. For practitioners, we provide actionable guidance emphasising the need to ensure fairness proactively, as interviewees do not consider this aspect when deciding to adopt ML-based HRA.

Suggested Citation

  • Hülter, Svenja M. & Ertel, Christian & Heidemann, Ansgar, 2024. "Exploring the individual adoption of human resource analytics: Behavioural beliefs and the role of machine learning characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:208:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005079
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005079
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akio Kawasaki & Ming Hsin Lin & Noriaki Matsushima, 2014. "Multi‐Market Competition, R&D, and Welfare in Oligopoly," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(3), pages 803-815, January.
    2. Kalinichenko L. L., 2010. "Competitiveness of Ukraine: problems and prospects," Вісник економіки транспорту і промисловості, CyberLeninka;Украинская государственная академия железнодорожного транспорта, issue 31, pages 96-101.
    3. Friedman, Nicola & Ormiston, Jarrod, 2022. "Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. L. Li, 2010. "Free Trade Networks with Imperfect Competition," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 0(4), pages 416-438, December.
    5. Prikshat, Verma & Islam, Mohammad & Patel, Parth & Malik, Ashish & Budhwar, Pawan & Gupta, Suraksha, 2023. "AI-Augmented HRM: Literature review and a proposed multilevel framework for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Omrani, Nessrine & Rivieccio, Giorgia & Fiore, Ugo & Schiavone, Francesco & Agreda, Sergio Garcia, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? An assessment of trust in AI-based systems: Concerns, ethics and contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. L. Li, 2010. "Free Trade Networks with Imperfect Competition," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 55(4), pages 416-438, December.
    8. Daniel W. Apley & Jingyu Zhu, 2020. "Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1059-1086, September.
    9. Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S. & Chenok, Daniel, 2020. "Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 205-213.
    10. Daniel Formolo & Luiz P. L. De Oliveira & Marcelo Sobottka, 2010. "A Competitive Searching-Based Chaotic Cipher," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(11), pages 1377-1390.
    11. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    12. Mula, Claire & Zybura, Nora & Hipp, Thomas, 2024. "From digitalized start-up to scale-up: Opening the black box of scaling in digitalized firms towards a scaling process framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Oecd, 2010. "Competition and Sports: Key findings, summary and notes," OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers 149, OECD Publishing.
    14. Anna Lena Hunkenschroer & Christoph Luetge, 2022. "Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 977-1007, July.
    15. Qing He & Terence Tai‐Leung Chong & Li Li & Jun Zhang, 2010. "A Competing Risks Analysis of Corporate Survival," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 1697-1718, December.
    16. Kim, Doha & Song, Yeosol & Kim, Songyie & Lee, Sewang & Wu, Yanqin & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Daeho, 2023. "How should the results of artificial intelligence be explained to users? - Research on consumer preferences in user-centered explainable artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Berkeley J. Dietvorst & Joseph P. Simmons & Cade Massey, 2018. "Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1155-1170, March.
    18. Oecd, 2010. "Improving Competition in Real Estate Transactions," OECD Journal: Competition Law and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 75-125.
    19. Oecd, 2010. "Competition in Bidding Markets," OECD Journal: Competition Law and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 69-151.
    20. Oecd, 2010. "Energy Security and Competition Policy," OECD Journal: Competition Law and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 7-90.
    21. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Baabdullah, Abdullah M., 2021. "Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    22. Pumplun, Luisa & Tauchert, Christoph & Heidt, Margareta, 2019. "A New Organizational Chassis for Artificial Intelligence - Exploring Organizational Readiness Factors," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 112582, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bunduchi, Raluca & Sitar-Tăut, Dan-Andrei & Mican, Daniel, 2025. "A legitimacy-based explanation for user acceptance of controversial technologies: The case of Generative AI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Shafiq Alam & Zhan Dong & Indrapriya Kularatne & Muhammad Salman Rashid, 2026. "Exploring approaches to overcome challenges in adopting human resource analytics through stakeholder engagement," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 729-787, February.
    3. Sven Bottesch & Chiara Schwenke & Maximilian Förster & Mathias Klier, 2025. "Driving business value through people analytics: Literature review and research agenda from an information systems perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-38, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Guoqiang & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Yuan, Yunpeng & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Anton, Roman, 2014. "Sustainable Intrapreneurship - The GSI Concept and Strategy - Unfolding Competitive Advantage via Fair Entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 69713, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Feb 2015.
    3. OGREAN Claudia, 2015. "Business Models To Meet The Challenges Of The Global Economy. A Literature Review," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 127-146, December.
    4. Deriu, Valerio & Pozharliev, Rumen & De Angelis, Matteo, 2024. "How trust and attachment styles jointly shape job candidates’ AI receptivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Bao, Haixu & Liu, Wenfei & Dai, Zheng, 2025. "Artificial intelligence vs. public administrators: Public trust, efficiency, and tolerance for errors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Manis, K.T. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2023. "AI-Enabled marketing capabilities and the hierarchy of capabilities: Conceptualization, proposition development, and research avenues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Do, Hoa & Chu, Lin Xiao & Shipton, Helen, 2025. "How and when AI-driven HRM promotes employee resilience and adaptive performance: A self-determination theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Khalil, Ashraf & Attri, Rekha & Ractham, Peter, 2025. "Deploying explainable AI in entrepreneurial organizations: Role of the human-AI interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Singu, Hari Babu & Chakraborty, Debarun & Troise, Ciro & Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Bresciani, Stefano, 2026. "Responsible AI for trustworthy tourism: A framework for mitigating ambiguity and anxiety with generative AI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Anton, Roman, 2015. "Monetary Development and Transmission in the Eurosystem," MPRA Paper 67323, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Oct 2015.
    11. Stepan Zemtsov & Vera Barinova & Alexey Pankratov & Evgeniy Kutsenko, 2016. "Potential High-Tech Сlusters in Russian Regions: From Current Policy to New Growth Areas," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(3 (eng)), pages 34-52.
    12. Jessica Müller-Pérez & Viridiana Sarahí Garza-Muñiz & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Jorge Alberto Esponda-Pérez & Rina Álvarez-Becerra, 2022. "The Future of Tamaulipas MSMEs after COVID-19: Intention to Adopt Inbound Marketing Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Hassan, Reda & Nguyen, Nhien & Finserås, Stine Rasdal & Adde, Lars & Strümke, Inga & Støen, Ragnhild, 2025. "Unlocking the black box: Enhancing human-AI collaboration in high-stakes healthcare scenarios through explainable AI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Cong Fang & Mingyuan Zhang & Paul Vinod Khiatani & Huan Lin & Wei Liu & Stephen Jia Wang, 2026. "A comparative analysis of generative AI adoption among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom: a UTAUT perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Jan Jöhnk & Malte Weißert & Katrin Wyrtki, 2021. "Ready or Not, AI Comes— An Interview Study of Organizational AI Readiness Factors," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(1), pages 5-20, February.
    16. Iversen, Evald Bundgaard & Cuskelly, Graham, 2015. "Effects of different policy approaches on sport facility utilisation strategies," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 529-541.
    17. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & A. Sharma & Nripendra P. Rana & M. Giannakis & P. Goel & Vincent Dutot, 2023. "Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research Topics, Trends, and Future Directions," Post-Print hal-04292607, HAL.
    18. Bernd Irlenbusch & Holger A. Rau & Rainer Michael Rilke, 2026. "Human–AI Evaluation and Gender Transparency: Application Decisions in Competitive Hiring," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 398, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    19. Gheorghe MINCULETE & Maria-Ana CHISEGA-NEGRILÃ, 2014. "Marketing Management Relational Approaches Focused on Consumer’s and Customer’s Needs and Desires," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 325-346, December.
    20. repec:pra:mprapa:67187 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Baudier, Patricia & Kondrateva, Galina & Ammi, Chantal, 2023. "Can blockchain enhance motivation to donate: The moderating impact of religion on donors' behavior in the USA's charity organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:208:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.