IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v139y2025ics0166497224001755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on evaluation of knowledge interaction indicators in multi-team systems based on management entropy

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Hui
  • Li, Hao
  • Zhang, Kexin

Abstract

Efficient knowledge interaction among teams can enhance the collaborative performance of Multi-team Systems (MTSs). Identifying and addressing issues within MTS knowledge interaction is a current topic in knowledge-driven MTS collaboration. However, there is a lack of scientific and measurable evaluation indicators and methods for effectively evaluating MTS knowledge interactions to aid decision-making. This study, integrating a network perspective with complex systems thinking and the theoretical principles of management entropy, constructs a systematic evaluation system for MTS knowledge and a corresponding methodological framework. Validated and analyzed through two case studies in diverse contexts, this system and method enable managers to pinpoint crucial indicators affecting the effectiveness of MTS knowledge at various stages, especially critical junctures that may arise during the evolving development of the MTS. This provides a basis for decision-making to enable timely managerial interventions at crucial moments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Hui & Li, Hao & Zhang, Kexin, 2025. "Research on evaluation of knowledge interaction indicators in multi-team systems based on management entropy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:139:y:2025:i:c:s0166497224001755
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001755
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:139:y:2025:i:c:s0166497224001755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.