IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v98y2025ics0038012124003070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of family members’ perception bias on service strategies of elder care institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xiaoxiao
  • Liang, Changyong

Abstract

Family members play an important role in the decision-making process of the elderly in accepting elder care services, which inevitably influences the operational strategy of elder care institutions (ECIs). Previous literature has focused on the disagreements between the elderly and their family members, but a research gap remains in examining the effects of family members' perception bias on ECIs' decisions to outsource service and on the elder care service market in general. Our study bridges this gap by employing a game-theoretic model that incorporates monopoly and duopoly markets to explore these effects. Our findings indicate that family members' perception bias for ECIs' services negatively impacts ECIs' prices, demand, and profit. Moreover, we find that in the monopoly market, an ECI should adopt the outsourcing strategy to reduce losses if family members' perception bias is higher. In the duopoly market, when family members' perception bias is higher, if one ECI adopts the outsourcing strategy, then the other ECI should opt for the self-providing strategy, and vice versa. Furthermore, we observe that a higher perception bias decreases family surplus and social welfare in the monopoly market. However, it may sometimes benefit family surplus and social welfare in the duopoly market. Our results offer insightful takeaways for ECIs' operational strategies and policymakers’ welfare policies in the elder care service market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xiaoxiao & Liang, Changyong, 2025. "Impact of family members’ perception bias on service strategies of elder care institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012124003070
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.102107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124003070
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Yugang & Dong, Yuxuan & Guo, Xiaolong, 2018. "Pricing for sales and per-use rental services with vertical differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 586-598.
    2. Gregory E. Kersten, 2014. "Multiattribute Procurement Auctions: Efficiency and Social Welfare in Theory and Practice," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 215-232, December.
    3. Sanjay Jain & Kun Qian, 2021. "Compensating Online Content Producers: A Theoretical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 7075-7090, November.
    4. Bruno Jullien & Markus Reisinger & Patrick Rey, 2023. "Personalized Pricing and Distribution Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1687-1702, March.
    5. Yue Wu & Esther Gal-Or & Tansev Geylani, 2022. "Regulating Native Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8045-8061, November.
    6. Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos & Teresa Savall, 2024. "How to explain social innovation in elderly care services: The role of for-profit and non-profit social enterprises," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1849-1877, September.
    7. Amit Mehra & Subodha Kumar & Jagmohan S. Raju, 2018. "Competitive Strategies for Brick-and-Mortar Stores to Counter “Showrooming”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3076-3090, July.
    8. Osborne, Martin J & Pitchik, Carolyn, 1987. "Equilibrium in Hotelling's Model of Spatial Competition," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 911-922, July.
    9. Prawesh, Shankar & Chari, Kaushal & Agrawal, Manish, 2021. "Industry Norms as Predictors of IT Outsourcing Behaviors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    10. Fakheri, Sajjad & Bahrami-Bidoni, Zeynab & Makui, Ahmad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto DR., 2022. "A sustainable competitive supply chain network design for a green product under uncertainty: A case study of Iranian leather industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Haizhen Lin, 2015. "Quality Choice And Market Structure: A Dynamic Analysis Of Nursing Home Oligopolies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1261-1290, November.
    12. Dmitri Kuksov & Chenxi Liao, 2019. "Opinion Leaders and Product Variety," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 812-834, September.
    13. Felipe Caro & Prashant Chintapalli & Kumar Rajaram & Chris S. Tang, 2018. "Improving Supplier Compliance Through Joint and Shared Audits with Collective Penalty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 363-380, May.
    14. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 141-168.
    15. Klimberg, Ronald & Ratick, Samuel, 2023. "Benchmarking nursing homes using the Order Rated Effectiveness model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Kaya, Onur, 2011. "Outsourcing vs. in-house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 168-178, April.
    17. Shuzhen Chen & Yuchen Pan & Desheng Wu & Alexandre Dolgui, 2023. "In-house versus outsourcing collection in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing technology development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(6), pages 1720-1735, March.
    18. Acuna, Jorge A. & Zayas-Castro, Jose L. & Feijoo, Felipe, 2022. "A bilevel Nash-in-Nash model for hospital mergers: A key to affordable care," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Sridhar Moorthy & Shervin Shahrokhi Tehrani, 2023. "Targeting Advertising Spending and Price on the Hotelling Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1057-1079, November.
    20. Sommer, Kim A. & Mabin, Victoria J., 2016. "Insights into the eldercare conundrum through complementary lenses of Boardman's SSM and TOC's Evaporating Cloud," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 286-300.
    21. Jordan Martel & Edward Dickersin Van Wesep & Robert Van Wesep, 2022. "Ratings and Cooperative Information Transmission," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 9175-9197, December.
    22. Mendoza-Alonzo, Jennifer & Zayas-Castro, José & Charkhgard, Hadi, 2020. "Office-based and home-care for older adults in primary care: A comparative analysis using the Nash bargaining solution," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    23. Wang, Congke & Liu, Yankui & Yang, Guoqing, 2023. "Adaptive distributionally robust hub location and routing problem with a third-party logistics strategy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    24. Fabio Caldieraro, 2016. "The Role of Brand Image and Product Characteristics on Firms’ Entry and OEM Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(11), pages 3327-3350, November.
    25. Haizhen Lin, 2015. "Quality Choice And Market Structure: A Dynamic Analysis Of Nursing Home Oligopolies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56, pages 1261-1290, November.
    26. Rick Antle & Peter Bogetoft, 2019. "Mix Stickiness Under Asymmetric Cost Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2787-2812, June.
    27. H. A. Eiselt & Gilbert Laporte, 1993. "The Existence of Equilibria in the 3-Facility Hotelling Model in a Tree," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 39-43, February.
    28. Justin Doran & Geraldine Ryan & Jane Bourke & Frank Crowley, 2019. "In-House Or Outsourcing Skills: How Best To Manage For Innovation?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-25, February.
    29. Susan Feng Lu & Konstantinos Serfes & Gerard Wedig & Bingxiao Wu, 2021. "Does Competition Improve Service Quality? The Case of Nursing Homes Where Public and Private Payers Coexist," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6493-6512, October.
    30. Shota Ichihashi & Byung-Cheol Kim, 2023. "Addictive Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1127-1145, February.
    31. Martin B. Hackmann, 2019. "Incentivizing Better Quality of Care: The Role of Medicaid and Competition in the Nursing Home Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(5), pages 1684-1716, May.
    32. Huang, Hongfu & Liu, Feng & Zhang, Peng, 2021. "To outsource or not to outsource? Warranty service provision strategies considering competition, costs and reliability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    33. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Neale Mahoney, 2022. "Producing Health: Measuring Value Added of Nursing Homes," NBER Working Papers 30228, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    34. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Ling, Liuyi & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "Competing OEMs’ responses to a developer's services installation and strategic update of platform quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 545-559.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin B. Hackmann & R. Vincent Pohl & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2024. "Patient versus Provider Incentives in Long-Term Care," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 178-218, July.
    2. Iris Grant & Iris Kesternich & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2022. "Entry Decisions And Asymmetric Competition Between Non‐Profit And For‐Profit Homes In The Long‐Term Care Market," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(2), pages 631-670, May.
    3. Michael Alexeev & Ivan Dedyukhin & Leonid Polishchuk, 2024. "Ownership, Asymmetric Information, and Quality of Care for the Elderly: Evidence from US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic," CAEPR Working Papers 2024-006 Classification-, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    4. Gaëtan Fournier & Marco Scarsini, 2014. "Hotelling Games on Networks: Efficiency of Equilibria," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14033, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Dong, Shuang & Qin, Zhongfeng & Yan, Yingchen, 2022. "Effects of online-to-offline spillovers on pricing and quality strategies of competing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Jianjing Lin, 2023. "To follow the market or the parent system: Evidence from health IT adoption by hospital chains," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(4), pages 891-910, October.
    7. Xie, Lei & Liu, Yunping & Han, Hongshuai & (Martin) Qiu, Chun, 2023. "Outsourcing or reshoring? A manufacturer's sourcing strategy in the presence of government subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 131-149.
    8. Bär, Marlies & Bakx, Pieter & Wouterse, Bram & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2022. "Estimating the health value added by nursing homes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 1-23.
    9. Zhang, Ting & Tian, Yuan & Cheng, T.C.E., 2025. "Online retailing with key opinion leaders and product returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    10. Raphael Corbi & Fabio Miessi Sanches, 2024. "Church Tax Exemption and Structure of Religious Markets: a Dynamic Structural Analysis," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2024_31, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    11. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2020. "Manufacturer’s vertical integration strategies in a three-tier supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Susan Feng Lu & Konstantinos Serfes & Gerard Wedig & Bingxiao Wu, 2021. "Does Competition Improve Service Quality? The Case of Nursing Homes Where Public and Private Payers Coexist," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6493-6512, October.
    13. Yuan, Yichao & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2023. "Revelation mechanism and decoy strategy for a supply chain with consumer's perceived substitutability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Lee, Yong Suk & Iizuka, Toshiaki & Eggleston, Karen, 2025. "Robots and labor in nursing homes," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Tian, Chen & Xiao, Tiaojun & Shang, Jennifer, 2022. "Channel differentiation strategy in a dual-channel supply chain considering free riding behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 473-485.
    16. Raphael Corbi & Fabio Miessi Sanches, 2022. "Church Competition, Religious Subsidies and the Rise of Evangelicalism: a Dynamic Structural Analysis," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2022_09, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    17. Myrto Kalouptsidi & Paul T. Scott & Eduardo Souza‐Rodrigues, 2021. "Identification of counterfactuals in dynamic discrete choice models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 351-403, May.
    18. Pun, Hubert & Chen, Jing & Li, Wei, 2020. "Channel strategy for manufacturers in the presence of service freeriders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 460-479.
    19. Zha, Yong & Wu, Xiangxiang & Liu, Haonan & Yu, Yugang, 2023. "Impact of a Platform Developer's Entry on the Device Manufacturer with Different Power Structures and Revenue Models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Bar, M.; & Bakx, P.; & Wouterse, B.; & van Doorslaer, Eddy.;, 2022. "Estimating the health value added by nursing homes," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/12, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012124003070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.