Contextualizing in International Business research: Why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it?
Summary This paper joins the academic conversation about context and contextualization in Management and International Business (IB) research. I explain why it is both relevant and interesting to debate issues of context and contextualization and, as an IB scholar myself, I argue that while IB as a discipline can and should be at the forefront of meaningful contextualization of research, the current situation is that it is not. I maintain that we are much too often context-blind or blindfold ourselves intentionally against context. I advocate that there is no justification for this state of affairs and offer suggestions as to how we can improve the status quo. I propose that we are well equipped to conduct deep contextualization rather than merely study processes and phenomena across contexts. More specifically, I argue that we should include contextual attributes in our theorizing in a more direct manner, without fearing that causal explanation suffers from contextualization. I make the point that we will benefit from presenting and discussing our methodological choices as tough decisions based on multiple context-related criteria and that voicing context can help us to be stronger in selecting, employing and justifying our methodologies. I take issue with the fact that conducting IB research in research teams that transcend countries (and other contexts) does not, per se, guarantee that the team research is context-sensitive. Finally, I emphasize that it is meaningful and responsible to report context in a genuine manner as this helps to provide details that are relevant to understanding and trusting our findings even though it does not, in general, help in winning the academic publishing race.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 27 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/bibliographic|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:27:y:2011:i:1:p:129-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.