IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v76y2025ics0275531925001230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do women directors ensure corporate ethics? The role of board tenure

Author

Listed:
  • Ursel, Nancy
  • Zhong, Ligang

Abstract

Women board members have been shown to reduce corporate misconduct. We ask how they accomplish this given that their numbers are small, their voices often go unheard, and they tend to be on committees that have been considered less important. Using social identity theory and the theory of gendered expectations, we hypothesize that long tenure on the board is the characteristic that allows a woman director’s voice to be heard. We test our hypothesis by looking at women directors’ power to reduce stock option backdating. Our hypothesis regarding long tenure is supported. Other sources of power such as critical mass, prestige and ownership power are not significantly related to reduced corporate misconduct. We use logit regression and perform several robustness checks, including instrumental variable techniques to deal with possible endogeneity. We discuss the implications of our findings for management practice and board structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ursel, Nancy & Zhong, Ligang, 2025. "How do women directors ensure corporate ethics? The role of board tenure," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925001230
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925001230
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925001230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.