IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v76y2025ics0275531925001217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting ESG disclosure quality through board secretaries' characteristics: A machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Jie
  • Niu, Yanfang
  • Shi, Wenlei
  • Zhu, Kanghuan

Abstract

This study employs a machine learning approach to explore the relationship between board secretaries' (BS') characteristics and the quality of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure in enterprises. The results indicate that BS' competence characteristics are the primary drivers of ESG disclosure quality, with salary, functional experience, age, and tenure as key predictive features. BS' salary and functional experience show an upward trend with ESG disclosure quality. BS' age has a nonlinear predictive effect on ESG disclosure quality, exhibiting an approximately positive "U"-shaped relationship. BS' tenure also demonstrates a nonlinear predictive effect. Robustness checks confirm that BS' characteristics remain crucial factors even after controlling for CEO characteristics. Interaction effect analysis reveals that the impact of BS' salary, functional experience, and tenure on ESG disclosure quality is more significant among middle-aged board secretaries. Heterogeneity tests based on ownership type, institutional environment, and media attention show that the importance of BS' characteristics varies across different contexts. This study provides a new perspective and empirical evidence for predicting ESG disclosure quality, offering guidance for improving the appointment process and incentive mechanisms for board secretaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Jie & Niu, Yanfang & Shi, Wenlei & Zhu, Kanghuan, 2025. "Predicting ESG disclosure quality through board secretaries' characteristics: A machine learning approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925001217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925001217
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925001217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.