IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v103y2025ics1059056025005222.html

The innovation Dilemma: Unpacking the impact of China's expanded import policies on innovation of manufacturing enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Yang
  • Ma, Jing
  • Wei, Yonggui

Abstract

Drawing on data from the China Industrial Enterprise Database, Customs Import and Export Trade Database, and the China Intellectual Property Office Patent Database, this study examines the impact and mechanisms through which China's expanded import policies influence innovation in manufacturing enterprises. The results suggest that: (1) The expansion of import policies generally exerts a significant inhibitory effect on innovation within manufacturing enterprises, though this effect varies based on enterprise characteristics. Specifically, the inhibitory effect is pronounced for utility model patents and design patents but negligible for invention patents. The effect is also more significant in capital- and technology-intensive industries, while labor-intensive enterprises show little to no impact. Additionally, regional proximity to overseas markets negatively influences innovation in regions with higher market proximity, whereas no such effect is observed in regions with lower proximity. Lastly, the policy has a positive impact on innovation in state-owned enterprises but a significant negative effect in foreign-funded enterprises. (2) The primary drivers of the inhibitory impact on innovation are the import competition and lock-in effects associated with expanded imports. Thus, to optimize the effects of its import expansion strategy, China should not only focus on importing key core technology products but also invest in strengthening its domestic innovation capabilities, avoiding potential constraints on economic and industrial development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Yang & Ma, Jing & Wei, Yonggui, 2025. "The innovation Dilemma: Unpacking the impact of China's expanded import policies on innovation of manufacturing enterprises," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025005222
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025005222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Liming & Lu, Feixiang & Guan, Haoyuan & Lu, Xiang & Zhai, Jun & Liu, Junchao, 2025. "Tax incentives, business environment, and entrepreneurial and innovation outcome," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Huang, Jian & Guo, Cheng & Yan, Siyu, 2025. "The integration of technology and finance and corporate innovation boundary," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Feng, Ling & Li, Zhiyuan & Swenson, Deborah L., 2016. "The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-101.
    4. Gao, Hongli & Wang, Peijie & Yi, Hongyu & Lv, Chen, 2025. "Crowding out or Lock-in? Patent thickets and latecomers’ Innovation policies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Wang, Yining & Zhou, Ning & Gao, Jie & Jiang, Ping & Yan, Ximu & Zhang, Mi & Chen, Lusha, 2025. "Tax incentive policies, market competition, and corporate innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    6. Michael Sposi & B Ravikumar & Piyusha Mutreja, 2014. "Capital goods trade and economic development," 2014 Meeting Papers 1374, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    7. Liu, Qing & Qiu, Larry D., 2016. "Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from Chinese firms' patent filings," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 166-183.
    8. Hao, Panpan & Wang, Yuchen & Fan, Liyan, 2025. "Government-guided fund, social resources, and corporate green innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Alla Lileeva & Daniel Trefler, 2010. "Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-level Productivity…For Some Plants," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(3), pages 1051-1099.
    10. Mauro Caselli, 2018. "Do all imports matter for productivity? Intermediate inputs vs capital goods," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(2), pages 285-311, August.
    11. Alexander Vogel & Joachim Wagner, 2016. "Higher Productivity in Importing German Manufacturing Firms: Self-selection, Learning from Importing or Both?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Microeconometrics of International Trade, chapter 4, pages 139-174, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Mary Amiti & Jozef Konings, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1611-1638, December.
    13. Jiang, Yuan & Wang, Xiaomei & Wang, Wenting & Yu, Xiaohan, 2025. "Impact of government attention guided by environmental policies on green technology innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Kasahara, Hiroyuki & Lapham, Beverly, 2013. "Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 297-316.
    15. Blalock, Garrick & Veloso, Francisco M., 2007. "Imports, Productivity Growth, and Supply Chain Learning," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1134-1151, July.
    16. Pol Antràs & Teresa C. Fort & Felix Tintelnot, 2017. "The Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and Evidence from US Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(9), pages 2514-2564, September.
    17. Li, Xibao, 2012. "Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 236-249.
    18. Hu, Siyang & Zhou, Xingyu & Li, Ping, 2025. "Tax incentives, market competition, and corporate innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Sun, Weizheng, 2025. "The role of interlocking directorates and managerial characteristics on corporate green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Paula Bustos, 2011. "Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(1), pages 304-340, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campbell, Jason, 2024. "The link between import sources and export success: Evidence from China," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Xavier Cirera & Daniel Lederman & Juan A. Máñez Castillejo & María E. Rochina Barrachina & Juan A. Sanchis-Llopis, 2021. "Firm productivity gains in a period of slow trade liberalization: evidence from Brazil," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(1), pages 57-87, April.
    3. Robert J. R. Elliott & Liza Jabbour & Liyun Zhang, 2016. "Firm productivity and importing: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1086-1124, August.
    4. Youngho Kang & Unjung Whang, 2023. "Exporting and sourcing strategies," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1414-1441, September.
    5. Bruno Merlevede & Angelos Theodorakopoulos, 2016. "Productivity effects from inter-industry offshoring and inshoring: Firm-level evidence from Belgium," FIW Working Paper series 165, FIW.
    6. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Laksanapanyakul, Nuttawut & Matsuura, Toshiyuki, 2020. "Do regional trade agreements really help global value chains develop? evidence from Thailand," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Shen, Binchao, 2025. "Intermediated trade and innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Crinò, Rosario & Bonfiglioli, Alessandra & Gancia, Gino, 2021. "International Trade with Heterogeneous Firms: Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 16249, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. David Aristei & Davide Castellani & Chiara Franco, 2013. "Firms’ exporting and importing activities: is there a two-way relationship?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 149(1), pages 55-84, March.
    10. Nakhoda, Aadil, 2012. "The influence of financial leverage of firms on their international trading activities," MPRA Paper 35765, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Maria Bas & Antoine Berthou, 2017. "Does Input-Trade Liberalization Affect Firms’ Foreign Technology Choice?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 31(2), pages 351-384.
    12. He, Ling-Yun & Huang, Geng, 2023. "Can importing improve the energy efficiency? Theory and evidence from Chinese industrial firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 451-469.
    13. Liu, Qing & Qiu, Larry D., 2016. "Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from Chinese firms' patent filings," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 166-183.
    14. Fabienne Rasel, 2017. "ICT and global sourcing – evidence for German manufacturing and service firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 634-660, October.
    15. Bruno Merlevede & Angelos Theodorakopoulos, 2018. "Productivity Effects of Internationalisation Through the Domestic Supply Chain: Evidence from Europe," Working Papers of VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics 627689, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics.
    16. Antonio Navas & Francesco Serti & Chiara Tomasi, 2020. "The role of the gravity forces on firms’ trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 1059-1097, August.
    17. Segundo Camino‐Mogro & Paul Carrillo‐Maldonado, 2023. "Do imports of intermediate inputs generate higher productivity? Evidence from Ecuadorian manufacturing firms," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 1471-1521, May.
    18. Qing Liu & Larry D Qiu, 2017. "Effects of Intermediate Input Tariff Reduction on Innovations in China," Working Papers 022017, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
    19. Patricia Augier & Olivier Cadot & Marion Dovis, 2013. "Imports and TFP at the firm level: the role of absorptive capacity," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 956-981, August.
    20. Carlo Altomonte & Tommaso Aquilante & Gábor Békés & Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, 2013. "Internationalization and innovation of firms: evidence and policy [Managing knowledge within and outside the multinational corporation]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 28(76), pages 663-700.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025005222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.