IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v50y2015icp1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power of salinity gradients: An Australian example

Author

Listed:
  • Helfer, Fernanda
  • Lemckert, Charles

Abstract

The development and exploitation of sustainable and environmentally friendly energy sources are required in order to resolve global energy shortages and to reduce the reliance of many countries on fossil fuel combustion. Salinity gradient energy has been considered a potential candidate for renewable energy due to the abundance of saline waters that could be combined with less saline solutions across the globe. Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) is one of the technologies to harness salinity gradient energy. Apart from zero carbon dioxide emission, PRO is capable of producing power with less periodicity, abundance and low environmental impacts. One of the preconditions for the technical and financial feasibility of PRO, however, is the development of a PRO-specific membrane—one that meets the conditions that none of the current commercially-available membranes have met so far. The current paper discusses the progress made in PRO membrane development, particularly during the past decade, and analyses the challenges that are still hindering the implementation of PRO at large scales. Also, this paper explores possibilities for the implementation of PRO by analysing various combinations of existent solutions of various salt concentrations. Australia has been chosen to demonstrate some potential applications of PRO. This vast country has extensive reserves of saline waters that could be paired with less concentrated solutions to generate power. For each combination of solutions, a conceptual idea is presented, and an estimate of power production is given. Also, advantages and disadvantages of each scheme are discussed. The ideas and estimates can be easily extrapolated, with minor adjustments, to other countries with similar conditions. It is hoped that this publication will be valuable to those nations that have similar policies as Australia’s, with government incentives for the development and implementation of new technologies to explore new renewable energy sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Helfer, Fernanda & Lemckert, Charles, 2015. "The power of salinity gradients: An Australian example," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211500461X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wick, Gerald L., 1978. "Power from salinity gradients," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 95-100.
    2. Bruce E. Logan & Menachem Elimelech, 2012. "Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7411), pages 313-319, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihye Kim & Kwanho Jeong & Myoung Jun Park & Ho Kyong Shon & Joon Ha Kim, 2015. "Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Sahin, Oz & Stewart, Rodney A. & Giurco, Damien & Porter, Michael G., 2017. "Renewable hydropower generation as a co-benefit of balanced urban water portfolio management and flood risk mitigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1076-1087.
    3. Essalhi, Mohamed & Halil Avci, Ahmet & Lipnizki, Frank & Tavajohi, Naser, 2023. "The potential of salinity gradient energy based on natural and anthropogenic resources in Sweden," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Roger Samsó & Júlia Crespin & Antonio García-Olivares & Jordi Solé, 2023. "Examining the Potential of Marine Renewable Energy: A Net Energy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    5. Fan, Jing-Li & Kong, Ling-Si & Wang, Hang & Zhang, Xian, 2019. "A water-energy nexus review from the perspective of urban metabolism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 128-136.
    6. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Pawlowski, Sylwin & Veerman, Joost & Bouzek, Karel & Fontananova, Enrica & di Profio, Gianluca & Velizarov, Svetlozar & Goulão Crespo, João & Nijmeijer, Kitty & Curcio, Efrem, 2018. "Progress and prospects in reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient energy conversion and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 290-331.
    7. Alvarez-Silva, O.A. & Osorio, A.F. & Winter, C., 2016. "Practical global salinity gradient energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1387-1395.
    8. Touati, Khaled & Tadeo, Fernando & Elfil, Hamza, 2017. "Osmotic energy recovery from Reverse Osmosis using two-stage Pressure Retarded Osmosis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 213-224.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kang, Byeong Dong & Kim, Hyun Jung & Lee, Moon Gu & Kim, Dong-Kwon, 2015. "Numerical study on energy harvesting from concentration gradient by reverse electrodialysis in anodic alumina nanopores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 525-538.
    2. Ali, Aamer & Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Macedonio, Francesca & Curcio, Efrem & Drioli, Enrico, 2018. "Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1-21.
    3. Olkis, C. & Santori, G. & Brandani, S., 2018. "An Adsorption Reverse Electrodialysis system for the generation of electricity from low-grade heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 222-234.
    4. Cala, Anggie & Maturana-Córdoba, Aymer & Soto-Verjel, Joseph, 2023. "Exploring the pretreatments' influence on pressure reverse osmosis: PRISMA review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Yang, Wei & Bao, Jingjing & Liu, Hongtao & Zhang, Jun & Guo, Lin, 2023. "Low-grade heat to hydrogen: Current technologies, challenges and prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Bui, Tri Quang & Magnussen, Ole-Petter & Cao, Vinh Duy & Wang, Wei & Kjøniksen, Anna-Lena & Aaker, Olav, 2021. "Osmotic engine converting energy from salinity difference to a hydraulic accumulator by utilizing polyelectrolyte hydrogels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2016. "Energy recovery by pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) in SWRO–PRO integrated processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 687-698.
    8. He, Wei & Wang, Jihong, 2017. "Feasibility study of energy storage by concentrating/desalinating water: Concentrated Water Energy Storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 872-884.
    9. Sagar Roy & Smruti Ragunath, 2018. "Emerging Membrane Technologies for Water and Energy Sustainability: Future Prospects, Constraints and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, November.
    10. Tan, Guangcai & Xu, Nan & Gao, Dingxue & Zhu, Xiuping, 2022. "Superabsorbent graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hybrid Poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels for efficient salinity gradient energy harvest," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Andrea Zaffora & Andrea Culcasi & Luigi Gurreri & Alessandro Cosenza & Alessandro Tamburini & Monica Santamaria & Giorgio Micale, 2020. "Energy Harvesting by Waste Acid/Base Neutralization via Bipolar Membrane Reverse Electrodialysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Emdadi, Arash & Gikas, Petros & Farazaki, Maria & Emami, Yunus, 2016. "Salinity gradient energy potential at the hyper saline Urmia Lake – ZarrinehRud River system in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 154-162.
    13. Kim, Juwan & Kim, Sung Jin & Kim, Dong-Kwon, 2013. "Energy harvesting from salinity gradient by reverse electrodialysis with anodic alumina nanopores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 413-421.
    14. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Pillay, Pragasen & Laflamme, Claude B., 2015. "Osmotic power potential in remote regions of Quebec," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 62-70.
    15. Tran, Thomas T.D. & Smith, Amanda D., 2017. "fEvaluation of renewable energy technologies and their potential for technical integration and cost-effective use within the U.S. energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1372-1388.
    16. Jin Wang & Zheng Cui & Shangzhen Li & Zeyuan Song & Miaolu He & Danxi Huang & Yuan Feng & YanZheng Liu & Ke Zhou & Xudong Wang & Lei Wang, 2024. "Unlocking osmotic energy harvesting potential in challenging real-world hypersaline environments through vermiculite-based hetero-nanochannels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Elyasigomari, Vahid & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2016. "Evaluation of the detrimental effects in osmotic power assisted reverse osmosis (RO) desalination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 608-619.
    18. Chanda, Sourayon & Tsai, Peichun Amy, 2019. "Numerical simulation of renewable power generation using reverse electrodialysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 531-543.
    19. Massimo Marino & Lorenza Misuri & Andrea Carati & Doriano Brogioli, 2014. "Proof-of-Concept of a Zinc-Silver Battery for the Extraction of Energy from a Concentration Difference," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Di Michele, F. & Felaco, E. & Gasser, I. & Serbinovskiy, A. & Struchtrup, H., 2019. "Modeling, simulation and optimization of a pressure retarded osmosis power station," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 189-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.