IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i10p11821-11845d57417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jihye Kim

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdan-gwagiro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-712, Korea)

  • Kwanho Jeong

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdan-gwagiro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-712, Korea)

  • Myoung Jun Park

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Post Box 129, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Ho Kyong Shon

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Post Box 129, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Joon Ha Kim

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdan-gwagiro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-712, Korea)

Abstract

Global energy consumption has been highly dependent on fossil fuels which cause severe climate change and, therefore, the exploration of new technologies to produce effective renewable energy plays an important role in the world. Pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) is one of the promising candidates to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels by harnessing energy from the salinity gradient between seawater and fresh water. In PRO, water is transported though a semi-permeable membrane from a low-concentrated feed solution to a high-concentrated draw solution. The increased volumetric water flow then runs a hydro-turbine to generate power. PRO technology has rapidly improved in recent years; however, the commercial-scale PRO plant is yet to be developed. In this context, recent developments on the PRO process are reviewed in terms of mathematical models, membrane modules, process designs, numerical works, and fouling and cleaning. In addition, the research requirements to accelerate PRO commercialization are discussed. It is expected that this article can help comprehensively understand the PRO process and thereby provide essential information to activate further research and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihye Kim & Kwanho Jeong & Myoung Jun Park & Ho Kyong Shon & Joon Ha Kim, 2015. "Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:10:p:11821-11845:d:57417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/10/11821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/10/11821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naguib, Maged Fouad & Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Laflamme, Claude B. & Pillay, Pragasen, 2015. "Modeling pressure-retarded osmotic power in commercial length membranes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 619-627.
    2. Helfer, Fernanda & Lemckert, Charles, 2015. "The power of salinity gradients: An Australian example," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Pillay, Pragasen & Laflamme, Claude B., 2015. "Osmotic power potential in remote regions of Quebec," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 62-70.
    4. Prante, Jeri L. & Ruskowitz, Jeffrey A. & Childress, Amy E. & Achilli, Andrea, 2014. "RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 104-114.
    5. Bruce E. Logan & Menachem Elimelech, 2012. "Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7411), pages 313-319, August.
    6. Li, Xue & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2014. "Thin-film composite P84 co-polyimide hollow fiber membranes for osmotic power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 600-610.
    7. Unknown, 2005. "Forward," 2005 Conference: Slovenia in the EU - Challenges for Agriculture, Food Science and Rural Affairs, November 10-11, 2005, Moravske Toplice, Slovenia 183804, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    8. Naghiloo, Ahmad & Abbaspour, Majid & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Bakhtari, Khosro, 2015. "Modeling and design of a 25 MW osmotic power plant (PRO) on Bahmanshir River of Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 51-59.
    9. Han, Gang & Ge, Qingchun & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2014. "Conceptual demonstration of novel closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis process for sustainable osmotic energy generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 383-393.
    10. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2015. "Stand-alone seawater RO (reverse osmosis) desalination powered by PV (photovoltaic) and PRO (pressure retarded osmosis)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 423-435.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Armando Carravetta & Oreste Fecarotta & Umberto Maria Golia & Michele Rocca & Riccardo Martino & Roberta Padulano & Tullio Tucciarelli, 2016. "Optimization of Osmotic Desalination Plants for Water Supply Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3965-3978, September.
    2. Cala, Anggie & Maturana-Córdoba, Aymer & Soto-Verjel, Joseph, 2023. "Exploring the pretreatments' influence on pressure reverse osmosis: PRISMA review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Konstantinos Zachopoulos & Nikolaos Kokkos & Costas Elmasides & Georgios Sylaios, 2022. "Coupling Hydrodynamic and Energy Production Models for Salinity Gradient Energy Assessment in a Salt-Wedge Estuary (Strymon River, Northern Greece)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Bassel A. Abdelkader & Mostafa H. Sharqawy, 2022. "Challenges Facing Pressure Retarded Osmosis Commercialization: A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Matta, Saly M. & Selam, Muaz A. & Manzoor, Husnain & Adham, Samer & Shon, Ho Kyong & Castier, Marcelo & Abdel-Wahab, Ahmed, 2022. "Predicting the performance of spiral-wound membranes in pressure-retarded osmosis processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 66-77.
    6. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of various RO+PRO and RO+FO integrated processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1038-1050.
    7. Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Al-Othman, Amani & Abdelwahab, Noun & Alami, Abdul Hai & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2021. "Recent developments in pressure retarded osmosis for desalination and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Sung Ho Chae & Young Mi Kim & Hosik Park & Jangwon Seo & Seung Ji Lim & Joon Ha Kim, 2019. "Modeling and Simulation Studies Analyzing the Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO) and PRO-Hybridized Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Laflamme, Claude B. & Pillay, Pragasen, 2016. "Experimental investigation of pressure retarded osmosis for renewable energy conversion: Towards increased net power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 425-435.
    2. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Elyasigomari, Vahid & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2016. "Evaluation of the detrimental effects in osmotic power assisted reverse osmosis (RO) desalination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 608-619.
    3. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2015. "Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a scale-up pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) osmotic power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 584-596.
    4. Maisonneuve, Jonathan & Chintalacheruvu, Sanjana, 2019. "Increasing osmotic power and energy with maximum power point tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 683-695.
    5. Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Pawlowski, Sylwin & Veerman, Joost & Bouzek, Karel & Fontananova, Enrica & di Profio, Gianluca & Velizarov, Svetlozar & Goulão Crespo, João & Nijmeijer, Kitty & Curcio, Efrem, 2018. "Progress and prospects in reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient energy conversion and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 290-331.
    6. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2016. "Energy recovery by pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) in SWRO–PRO integrated processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 687-698.
    7. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of various RO+PRO and RO+FO integrated processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1038-1050.
    8. Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Al-Othman, Amani & Abdelwahab, Noun & Alami, Abdul Hai & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2021. "Recent developments in pressure retarded osmosis for desalination and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Touati, Khaled & Tadeo, Fernando & Elfil, Hamza, 2017. "Osmotic energy recovery from Reverse Osmosis using two-stage Pressure Retarded Osmosis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 213-224.
    10. Zadeh, Ali Etemad & Touati, Khaled & Mulligan, Catherine N. & McCutcheon, Jeffrey R. & Rahaman, Md. Saifur, 2022. "Closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis draw solutions and their regeneration processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Altaee, Ali & Palenzuela, Patricia & Zaragoza, Guillermo & AlAnezi, Adnan Alhathal, 2017. "Single and dual stage closed-loop pressure retarded osmosis for power generation: Feasibility and performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 328-345.
    12. Sagar Roy & Smruti Ragunath, 2018. "Emerging Membrane Technologies for Water and Energy Sustainability: Future Prospects, Constraints and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, November.
    13. Manzoor, Husnain & Selam, Muaz A. & Abdur Rahman, Fahim Bin & Adham, Samer & Castier, Marcelo & Abdel-Wahab, Ahmed, 2020. "A tool for assessing the scalability of pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 987-999.
    14. Tran, Thomas T.D. & Smith, Amanda D., 2017. "fEvaluation of renewable energy technologies and their potential for technical integration and cost-effective use within the U.S. energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1372-1388.
    15. He, Wei & Wang, Yang & Shaheed, Mohammad Hasan, 2015. "Stand-alone seawater RO (reverse osmosis) desalination powered by PV (photovoltaic) and PRO (pressure retarded osmosis)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 423-435.
    16. Wan, Chun Feng & Chung, Tai-Shung, 2016. "Maximize the operating profit of a SWRO-PRO integrated process for optimal water production and energy recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 304-313.
    17. Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Rajaee, Fatemeh & Yan, Wei-Mon, 2019. "Osmotic desalination by solar energy: A critical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1473-1490.
    18. Ali, Aamer & Tufa, Ramato Ashu & Macedonio, Francesca & Curcio, Efrem & Drioli, Enrico, 2018. "Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1-21.
    19. Qais A. Khasawneh & Bourhan Tashtoush & Anas Nawafleh & Bayan Kan’an, 2018. "Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of a Hypersaline Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Power Plants: Dead Sea–Red Sea Conveyor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Tamburini, A. & Tedesco, M. & Cipollina, A. & Micale, G. & Ciofalo, M. & Papapetrou, M. & Van Baak, W. & Piacentino, A., 2017. "Reverse electrodialysis heat engine for sustainable power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1334-1353.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:10:p:11821-11845:d:57417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.