IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v53y2008i1p86-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Dimoudi, A.
  • Tompa, C.

Abstract

Buildings’ construction has a major determining role on the environment through consumption of land and raw materials and generation of waste. It is also a significant user of non-renewable energy and an emitter of greenhouse gases and other gaseous wastes. As environmental issues continue to become increasingly significant, buildings become more energy efficient and the energy needs for their operation decreases. Thus, the energy required for construction and consequently, for the material production, is getting of greater importance. The present paper investigates the role of different construction materials and quantifies them in terms of the embodied energy and the equivalent emissions of CO2 and SO2 in contemporary office buildings. It also assesses the importance of the embodied energy of the building's structure as compared to the operational energy of the building. It was shown that the embodied energy of the structure's building materials (concrete and reinforcement steel) represents the largest component in the building's total embodied energy of the examined buildings, varing from 66.73% to 59.57%, while the embodied energy of the building envelope's materials represents a lower but significant proportion of the building's total embodied energy. When the construction elements are examined, the slabs have the higher contribution at the embodied energy of the studied buildings and from the envelope elements, the external wall is contributing the maximum in the overall embodied energy of the building. The embodied energy correspondence varies between 12.55 and 18.50% of the energy needed for the operation of an office building over a 50 years life.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimoudi, A. & Tompa, C., 2008. "Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 86-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2008:i:1:p:86-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344908001481
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenzen, M. & Treloar, G., 2002. "Embodied energy in buildings: wood versus concrete--reply to Borjesson and Gustavsson," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 249-255, February.
    2. Borjesson, Pal & Gustavsson, Leif, 2000. "Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 575-588, July.
    3. Petersen, Ann Kristin & Solberg, Birger, 2005. "Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 249-259, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dunant, Cyrille F. & Drewniok, Michał P. & Sansom, Michael & Corbey, Simon & Allwood, Julian M. & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2017. "Real and perceived barriers to steel reuse across the UK construction value chain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 118-131.
    2. Taghipour, Amirhossein & Akkalatham, Wareerath & Eaknarajindawat, Natnaporn & Stefanakis, Alexandros I., 2022. "The impact of government policies and steel recycling companies' performance on sustainable management in a circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Casanovas-Rubio, Maria del Mar & Ramos, Gonzalo, 2017. "Decision-making tool for the assessment and selection of construction processes based on environmental criteria: Application to precast and cast-in-situ alternatives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-117.
    4. Chau, C.K. & Hui, W.K. & Ng, W.Y. & Powell, G., 2012. "Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-34.
    5. Lachimpadi, Suresh Kumar & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Taha, Mohd Raihan & Mokhtar, Mazlin, 2012. "Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 96-103.
    6. Tao Ran & Jianyong Pang & Jiuqun Zou, 2022. "An Emerging Solution for Medical Waste: Reuse of COVID-19 Protective Suit in Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Ortiz, Oscar & Pasqualino, Jorgelina C. & Díez, Gloria & Castells, Francesc, 2010. "The environmental impact of the construction phase: An application to composite walls from a life cycle perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 832-840.
    8. Ferrari, S. & Zoghi, M. & Blázquez, T. & Dall’O’, G., 2022. "New Level(s) framework: Assessing the affinity between the main international Green Building Rating Systems and the european scheme," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Li, Wei & Sun, Wen & Li, Guomin & Cui, Pengfei & Wu, Wen & Jin, Baihui, 2017. "Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of carbon intensity in China's construction industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 162-173.
    10. Qiang Du & Xinran Lu & Yi Li & Min Wu & Libiao Bai & Ming Yu, 2018. "Carbon Emissions in China’s Construction Industry: Calculations, Factors and Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yvan Dutil & Daniel Rousse & Guillermo Quesada, 2011. "Sustainable Buildings: An Ever Evolving Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Chihiro Kayo & Ryu Noda, 2018. "Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Wood Use in Civil Engineering in Japan Based on Life-Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. L. Gustavsson & R. Madlener & H.-F. Hoen & G. Jungmeier & T. Karjalainen & S. KlÖhn & K. Mahapatra & J. Pohjola & B. Solberg & H. Spelter, 2006. "The Role of Wood Material for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1097-1127, September.
    4. Dixit, Manish K., 2017. "Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 390-413.
    5. Braun, Martin & Winner, Georg & Schwarzbauer, Peter & Stern, Tobias, 2016. "Apparent Half-Life-Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) in Austria: Development and analysis of weighted time-series for 2002 to 2011," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 28-34.
    6. Reid Miner, 2023. "The 100-Year Method for Forecasting Carbon Sequestration in Forest Products in Use," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Tadeusz Kuczyński & Anna Staszczuk & Piotr Ziembicki & Anna Paluszak, 2021. "The Effect of the Thermal Mass of the Building Envelope on Summer Overheating of Dwellings in a Temperate Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Xueting Zhao, 2015. "LCA Methodologies an Annotated Bibliography," Working Papers Resource Document 2015-03, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    9. Shenghan Li & Huanyu Wu & Zhikun Ding, 2018. "Identifying Sustainable Wood Sources for the Construction Industry: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Luo, Wen & Mineo, Keito & Matsushita, Koji & Kanzaki, Mamoru, 2018. "Consumer willingness to pay for modern wooden structures: A comparison between China and Japan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 84-93.
    11. Timo Herberz & Claire Y. Barlow & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of a Single-Use Plastics Ban," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Bjart Holtsmark, 2012. "Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 415-428, May.
    13. Povellato, Andrea & Bosello, Francesco & Giupponi, Carlo, 2007. "A Review of Recent Studies on Cost Effectiveness of GHG Mitigation Measures in the European Agro-Forestry Sector," Natural Resources Management Working Papers 10268, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Hynynen Ari, 2016. "Future in Wood? Timber Construction in Boosting Local Development," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 127-139, June.
    15. Bin, Guoshu & Parker, Paul, 2012. "Measuring buildings for sustainability: Comparing the initial and retrofit ecological footprint of a century home – The REEP House," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 24-32.
    16. H. Böttcher & A. Freibauer & Y. Scholz & V. Gitz & Philippe Ciais & M. Mund & T. Wutzler & E.-D. Schulze, 2012. "Setting priorities for land management to mitigate climate change," Post-Print hal-00716172, HAL.
    17. Brainard, Julii & Lovett, Andrew & Bateman, Ian, 2006. "Sensitivity analysis in calculating the social value of carbon sequestered in British grown Sitka spruce," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 201-228, December.
    18. Lobianco, Antonello & Caurla, Sylvain & Delacote, Philippe & Barkaoui, Ahmed, 2016. "Carbon mitigation potential of the French forest sector under threat of combined physical and market impacts due to climate change," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 4-26.
    19. Caurla, Sylvain & Delacote, Philippe & Lecocq, Franck & Barthès, Julien & Barkaoui, Ahmed, 2013. "Combining an inter-sectoral carbon tax with sectoral mitigation policies: Impacts on the French forest sector," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 450-461.
    20. Jefferson Torres-Quezada & Tatiana Sánchez-Quezada, 2023. "Dataset of Specific Total Embodied Energy and Specific Total Weight of 40 Buildings from the Last Four Decades in the Andean Region of Ecuador," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2008:i:1:p:86-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.