IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v116y2017icp84-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional distribution and losses of end-of-life steel throughout multiple product life cycles—Insights from the global multiregional MaTrace model

Author

Listed:
  • Pauliuk, Stefan
  • Kondo, Yasushi
  • Nakamura, Shinichiro
  • Nakajima, Kenichi

Abstract

Substantial amounts of post-consumer scrap are exported to other regions or lost during recovery and remelting, and both export and losses pose a constraint to desires for having regionally closed material cycles. To quantify the challenges and trade-offs associated with closed-loop metal recycling, we looked at the material cycles from the perspective of a single material unit and trace a unit of material through several product life cycles. Focusing on steel, we used current process parameters, loss rates, and trade patterns of the steel cycle to study how steel that was originally contained in high quality applications such as machinery or vehicles with stringent purity requirements gets subsequently distributed across different regions and product groups such as building and construction with less stringent purity requirements. We applied MaTrace Global, a supply-driven multiregional model of steel flows coupled to a dynamic stock model of steel use. We found that, depending on region and product group, up to 95% of the steel consumed today will leave the use phase of that region until 2100, and that up to 50% can get lost in obsolete stocks, landfills, or slag piles until 2100. The high losses resulting from business-as-usual scrap recovery and recycling can be reduced, both by diverting postconsumer scrap into long-lived applications such as buildings and by improving the recovery rates in the waste management and remelting industries. Because the lifetimes of high-quality (cold-rolled) steel applications are shorter and remelting occurs more often than for buildings and infrastructure, we found and quantified a tradeoff between low losses and high-quality applications in the steel cycle. Furthermore, we found that with current trade patterns, reduced overall losses will lead to higher fractions of secondary steel being exported to other regions. Current loss rates, product lifetimes, and trade patterns impede the closure of the steel cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauliuk, Stefan & Kondo, Yasushi & Nakamura, Shinichiro & Nakajima, Kenichi, 2017. "Regional distribution and losses of end-of-life steel throughout multiple product life cycles—Insights from the global multiregional MaTrace model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 84-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:116:y:2017:i:c:p:84-93
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916302774
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Céline CARRERE & Jaime MELO DE, 2009. "Non-Tariff Measures: What do we Know, What Should be Done?," Working Papers 200933, CERDI.
    2. Matthew J. Eckelman & Barbara K. Reck & T. E. Graedel, 2012. "Exploring the Global Journey of Nickel with Markov Chain Models," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(3), pages 334-342, June.
    3. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Ferran Sancho, 2011. "Revisiting The Original Ghosh Model: Can It Be More Plausible?," Working Papers 11.02, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    4. Richard Wood & Konstantin Stadler & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Stephan Lutter & Stefan Giljum & Arjan De Koning & Jeroen Kuenen & Helmut Schütz & José Acosta-Fernández & Arkaitz Usubiaga & Moana Simas & Olg, 2014. "Global Sustainability Accounting—Developing EXIOBASE for Multi-Regional Footprint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Alexandre Tisserant & Stefan Pauliuk, 2016. "Matching global cobalt demand under different scenarios for co-production and mining attractiveness," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Alexandre Tisserant & Stefan Pauliuk, 2016. "Matching global cobalt demand under different scenarios for co-production and mining attractiveness," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Ferran Sancho, 2011. "Revisiting The Original Ghosh Model: Can It Be Made More Plausible?," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 319-328, February.
    8. Zengwei Yuan & Jun Bi & Yuichi Moriguichi, 2006. "The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(1‐2), pages 4-8, January.
    9. Faye Duchin & Stephen H. Levine, 2010. "Embodied Resource Flows and Product Flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(4), pages 586-597, August.
    10. Milford, Rachel L. & Allwood, Julian M. & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2011. "Assessing the potential of yield improvements, through process scrap reduction, for energy and CO2 abatement in the steel and aluminium sectors," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 1185-1195.
    11. Shinichiro Nakamura & Kenichi Nakajima & Yasushi Kondo & Tetsuya Nagasaka, 2007. "The Waste Input‐Output Approach to Materials Flow Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(4), pages 50-63, October.
    12. Hajime Ohno & Kazuyo Matsubae & Kenichi Nakajima & Shinichiro Nakamura & Tetsuya Nagasaka, 2014. "Unintentional Flow of Alloying Elements in Steel during Recycling of End-of-Life Vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(2), pages 242-253, April.
    13. Faye Duchin & Stephen H. Levine, 2013. "Embodied Resource Flows in a Global Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(1), pages 65-78, February.
    14. Masahiro Oguchi & Shinsuke Murakami & Tomohiro Tasaki & Ichiro Daigo & Seiji Hashimoto, 2010. "Lifespan of Commodities, Part II," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(4), pages 613-626, August.
    15. Shinsuke Murakami & Masahiro Oguchi & Tomohiro Tasaki & Ichiro Daigo & Seiji Hashimoto, 2010. "Lifespan of Commodities, Part I," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(4), pages 598-612, August.
    16. Daigo, Ichiro & Osako, Shun & Adachi, Yoshihiro & Matsuno, Yasunari, 2014. "Time-series analysis of global zinc demand associated with steel," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 35-40.
    17. Carruth, Mark A. & Allwood, Julian M. & Moynihan, Muiris C., 2011. "The technical potential for reducing metal requirements through lightweight product design," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 48-60.
    18. Gaustad, Gabrielle & Olivetti, Elsa & Kirchain, Randolph, 2012. "Improving aluminum recycling: A survey of sorting and impurity removal technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 79-87.
    19. Eckelman, Matthew J. & Daigo, Ichiro, 2008. "Markov chain modeling of the global technological lifetime of copper," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 265-273, September.
    20. Ohno, Hajime & Matsubae, Kazuyo & Nakajima, Kenichi & Kondo, Yasushi & Nakamura, Shinichiro & Nagasaka, Tetsuya, 2015. "Toward the efficient recycling of alloying elements from end of life vehicle steel scrap," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 11-20.
    21. Kirsten S. Wiebe, 2016. "The impact of renewable energy diffusion on European consumption-based emissions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 133-150, June.
    22. Johnson, Jeremiah & Reck, B.K. & Wang, T. & Graedel, T.E., 2008. "The energy benefit of stainless steel recycling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 181-192, January.
    23. van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Boskaljon, Willem & Neelis, Maarten L. & Saygin, Deger & Patel, Martin K., 2016. "Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 15-36.
    24. Oda, Junichiro & Akimoto, Keigo & Tomoda, Toshimasa, 2013. "Long-term global availability of steel scrap," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 81-91.
    25. Hatayama, Hiroki & Daigo, Ichiro & Tahara, Kiyotaka, 2014. "Tracking effective measures for closed-loop recycling of automobile steel in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 65-71.
    26. T. E. Graedel & Julian Allwood & Jean‐Pierre Birat & Matthias Buchert & Christian Hagelüken & Barbara K. Reck & Scott F. Sibley & Guido Sonnemann, 2011. "What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 355-366, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shinichiro Nakamura, 2020. "3EID and Waste IO: the state of environmentally extended Input-Output Analysis in Japan," Working Papers 2010, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    2. Hanspeter Wieland & Manfred Lenzen & Arne Geschke & Jacob Fry & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Nina Eisenmenger & Johannes Schenk & Stefan Giljum, 2022. "The PIOLab: Building global physical input–output tables in a virtual laboratory," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 683-703, June.
    3. Toniolo, Sara & Mazzi, Anna & Pieretto, Chiara & Scipioni, Antonio, 2017. "Allocation strategies in comparative life cycle assessment for recycling: Considerations from case studies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 249-261.
    4. Cyrille F. Dunant & Trishla Shah & Michał P. Drewniok & Matteo Craglia & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "A new method to estimate the lifetime of long‐life product categories," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 321-332, April.
    5. Buchner, Hanno & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Fellner, Johann, 2017. "Potential recycling constraints due to future supply and demand of wrought and cast Al scrap—A closed system perspective on Austria," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 135-142.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    2. Barbara V. Kasulaitis & Callie W. Babbitt & Andrew K. Krock, 2019. "Dematerialization and the Circular Economy: Comparing Strategies to Reduce Material Impacts of the Consumer Electronic Product Ecosystem," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 119-132, February.
    3. Glenn A. Aguilar-Hernandez & Carlos Pablo Sigüenza-Sanchez & Franco Donati & João F. D. Rodrigues & Arnold Tukker, 2018. "Assessing circularity interventions: a review of EEIOA-based studies," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson & Givry, Philippe & Canning, Louise & Franklin-Johnson, Elizabeth, 2018. "Longevity and Circularity as Indicators of Eco-Efficient Resource Use in the Circular Economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 297-306.
    5. María Fernanda Godoy León & Cristina T. Matos & Konstantinos Georgitzikis & Fabrice Mathieux & Jo Dewulf, 2022. "Material system analysis: Functional and nonfunctional cobalt in the EU, 2012–2016," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1277-1293, August.
    6. Jan Streeck & Stefan Pauliuk & Hanspeter Wieland & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2023. "A review of methods to trace material flows into final products in dynamic material flow analysis: From industry shipments in physical units to monetary input–output tables, Part 1," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 436-456, April.
    7. Jean-Yves Courtonne & Pierre-Yves Longaretti & Julien Alapetite & Denis Dupré, 2015. "Environmental pressures embodied in the French cereals supply chain," Working Papers hal-01150067, HAL.
    8. Alexandre Tisserant & Stefan Pauliuk, 2016. "Matching global cobalt demand under different scenarios for co-production and mining attractiveness," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Alexandre Tisserant & Stefan Pauliuk, 2016. "Matching global cobalt demand under different scenarios for co-production and mining attractiveness," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Andersson, Magnus & Ljunggren Söderman, Maria & Sandén, Björn A., 2019. "Challenges of recycling multiple scarce metals: The case of Swedish ELV and WEEE recycling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Tang, Chen & Sprecher, Benjamin & Tukker, Arnold & Mogollón, José M., 2021. "The impact of climate policy implementation on lithium, cobalt and nickel demand: The case of the Dutch automotive sector up to 2040," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Stefanie Klose & Stefan Pauliuk, 2021. "Quantifying longevity and circularity of copper for different resource efficiency policies at the material and product levels," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 979-993, August.
    13. Ryosuke Yokoi & Jun Nakatani & Yuichi Moriguchi, 2018. "An Extended Model for Tracking Accumulation Pathways of Materials Using Input–Output Tables: Application to Copper Flows in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Till Zimmermann & Stefan Gößling-Reisemann, 2014. "Recycling Potentials of Critical Metals-Analyzing Secondary Flows from Selected Applications," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Xin Lu & Hajime Ohno & Osamu Takeda & Takahiro Miki & Yasushi Sasaki & Hongmin Zhu & Tetsuya Nagasaka, 2022. "Toward an efficient recycling system: Evaluating recyclability of end‐of‐life stainless steels by considering elements distribution during a remelting process," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1701-1713, October.
    16. Frank Figge & Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Siarhei Manzhynski, 2022. "Value creation and the circular economy: A tale of three externalities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1690-1700, October.
    17. Matilda Axelson & Sebastian Oberthür & Lars J. Nilsson, 2021. "Emission reduction strategies in the EU steel industry: Implications for business model innovation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 390-402, April.
    18. Juan C. Surís-Regueiro & José L. Santiago, 2016. "An Input-Output methodological proposal to quantifying socio economic impacts linked to supply shocks," Working Papers 1603, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    19. Cámara, Angeles & Medina, Ana, 2021. "Measuring the economic impact of immigrant workers exit from Madrid region labor market," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 49, pages 65-88.
    20. Becker, Jonathon M., 2021. "General equilibrium impacts on the U.S. economy of a disruption to Chinese cobalt supply," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:116:y:2017:i:c:p:84-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.