IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v292y2026ics0925527326000034.html

Applying sequential bifurcation and feed-forward simulation to reduce the prescriptive response time of a digital twin

Author

Listed:
  • Walton, Ryan B.
  • Ciarallo, Frank W.
  • Champagne, Lance E.

Abstract

Recent advances in digital twin research have increasingly emphasized their role in real-time decision support for production and logistics systems, yet significant methodological gaps remain in enabling timely prescriptive analytics. This study addresses these gaps by proposing and evaluating an integrated approach that accelerates a digital twin’s ability to generate effective, computationally feasible decisions under dynamic operating conditions. This research envisions the digital twin as a decision support system capable of timely, relevant, and effective decision-making. To achieve this promise, the digital twin can describe its environment, predict future events, prescribe a course of action, and then actualize this course of action in the physical system. To ensure the decision is timely, relevant, and effective, the ability to quickly prescribe courses of action becomes paramount. This research addresses the fundamental trade-off between decision speed and depth of insight. Navigating this trade-off is facilitated by effective use of models to produce timely information, rapid identification of critical factors that drive decisions, and implementation of decisions when sufficient insight is available.

Suggested Citation

  • Walton, Ryan B. & Ciarallo, Frank W. & Champagne, Lance E., 2026. "Applying sequential bifurcation and feed-forward simulation to reduce the prescriptive response time of a digital twin," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:292:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326000034
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.109912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527326000034
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.109912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K Katsaliaki & N Mustafee & S J E Taylor & S Brailsford, 2009. "Comparing conventional and distributed approaches to simulation in a complex supply-chain health system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 43-51, January.
    2. J. G. Shanthikumar & R. G. Sargent, 1983. "A Unifying View of Hybrid Simulation/Analytic Models and Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1030-1052, December.
    3. Lepenioti, Katerina & Bousdekis, Alexandros & Apostolou, Dimitris & Mentzas, Gregoris, 2020. "Prescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 57-70.
    4. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin & Tim Zajic, 1999. "Multilevel Splitting for Estimating Rare Event Probabilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 585-600, August.
    5. Dmitry Ivanov, 2024. "Conceptualisation of a 7-element digital twin framework in supply chain and operations management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(6), pages 2220-2232, March.
    6. Hong Wan & Bruce E. Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson, 2010. "Improving the Efficiency and Efficacy of Controlled Sequential Bifurcation for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 482-492, August.
    7. Hong Wan & Bruce E. Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "Controlled Sequential Bifurcation: A New Factor-Screening Method for Discrete-Event Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 743-755, August.
    8. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2025. "Conceptual and formal models for design, adaptation, and control of digital twins in supply chain ecosystems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Hyun Joong Yoon & Weiming Shen, 2006. "Simulation-based real-time decision making for manufacturing automation systems: a review," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2/3), pages 188-202.
    10. Giovanni Lugaresi & Andrea Matta, 2018. "Real-Time Simulation In Manufacturing Systems: Challenges And Research Directions," Post-Print hal-03880595, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    2. Nicola Rossi & Mario Bačić & Lovorka Librić & Meho Saša Kovačević, 2023. "Methodology for Identification of the Key Levee Parameters for Limit-State Analyses Based on Sequential Bifurcation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Ivanov, Dmitry & Gusikhin, Oleg, 2026. "Supply chain digital twin design and implementation at scale: A case study at the Ford Motor Company and generalizations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    5. Shi, Wen & Shang, Jennifer & Liu, Zhixue & Zuo, Xiaolu, 2014. "Optimal design of the auto parts supply chain for JIT operations: Sequential bifurcation factor screening and multi-response surface methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 664-676.
    6. Shi, Wen & Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Liu, Zhixue, 2014. "Factor screening for simulation with multiple responses: Sequential bifurcation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 136-147.
    7. Shi, Wen & Chen, Ao & Xie, Xiang, 2024. "Generating and validating cluster sampling matrices for model-free factor screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 241-257.
    8. Shi, Wen & Chen, Xi, 2019. "Controlled Morris method: A new factor screening approach empowered by a distribution-free sequential multiple testing procedure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 299-314.
    9. Wen Shi & Xi Chen, 2018. "Efficient budget allocation strategies for elementary effects method in stochastic simulation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(3), pages 218-241, April.
    10. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    11. Ehsan Mehdad & Jack P.C. Kleijnen, 2018. "Stochastic intrinsic Kriging for simulation metamodeling," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 322-337, May.
    12. Latinovic, Zoran & Chatterjee, Sharmila C., 2022. "Achieving the promise of AI and ML in delivering economic and relational customer value in B2B," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 966-974.
    13. Regine Pei Tze Oh & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Hong Wan & Mark E. Nissen, 2009. "Efficient experimental design tools for exploring large simulation models," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 237-257, September.
    14. Shi, Wen & Liu, Zhixue & Shang, Jennifer & Cui, Yujia, 2013. "Multi-criteria robust design of a JIT-based cross-docking distribution center for an auto parts supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 695-706.
    15. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2025. "Conceptual and formal models for design, adaptation, and control of digital twins in supply chain ecosystems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Vinay Singh & Bhasker Choubey & Stephan Sauer, 2024. "Liquidity forecasting at corporate and subsidiary levels using machine learning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), September.
    17. D.D. Riley & X. Koutsoukos, 2014. "Probabilistic verification of a biodiesel production system using statistical model checking," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 452-469, September.
    18. Kontosakos, Vasileios E. & Mendonca, Keegan & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Zuev, Konstantin M., 2021. "Pricing discretely-monitored double barrier options with small probabilities of execution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 313-330.
    19. Jacob Hornik & Matti Rachamim, 2025. "Television shows ideation, and testing with smart digital twins to advance ratings," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4127-4158, October.
    20. Christopher Wissuchek & Patrick Zschech, 2025. "Prescriptive analytics systems revised: a systematic literature review from an information systems perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 279-353, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:292:y:2026:i:c:s0925527326000034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.