IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v234y2021ics0925527321000116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electric vehicle battery secondary use under government subsidy: A closed-loop supply chain perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Xiaoyu
  • Zhou, Li
  • Huang, Hongfu
  • Shi, Xiutian
  • Ieromonachou, Petros

Abstract

Electric vehicle batteries should normally be removed from electric vehicles when their power capacity fall to 70% ~ 80% of new batteries. However, removed batteries can still be secondary used for other purposes, such as energy storage, before remanufacturing. To promote electric vehicle battery secondary use, this research studies a two-period battery secondary use closed-loop supply chain model consisting of a battery (re)manufacturer, a secondary user and a government. The government may provide subsidies for the secondary users to incentivize electric vehicle battery secondary use. It is found that, only when the recycled batteries' remaining power capacity is relatively high or their remanufacturing rate is relatively low, the government will consider a subsidy. In addition, under government's subsidy regulation, secondary battery users need to determine the quantities of batteries with relatively high power capacity for secondary use. Theoretically, this study enriches the research field of sustainable development of electric vehicle battery industry. Practically, this study also helps practitioners to better manage closed-loop supply chains with battery secondary use, and to enhance supply chain efficiency. Also, this study contributes to governments' regulatory decisions toward electric vehicle industries to balance economy and sustainability in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Xiaoyu & Zhou, Li & Huang, Hongfu & Shi, Xiutian & Ieromonachou, Petros, 2021. "Electric vehicle battery secondary use under government subsidy: A closed-loop supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321000116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527321000116
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    2. Sheldon, Tamara L. & Dua, Rubal, 2020. "Effectiveness of China's plug-in electric vehicle subsidy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Hattori, Keisuke, 2017. "Optimal combination of innovation and environmental policies under technology licensing," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 601-609.
    4. Cai, Xiaoqiang & Lai, Minghui & Li, Xiang & Li, Yongjian & Wu, Xianyi, 2014. "Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 374-382.
    5. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    6. Dongxue Guo & Yi He & Yuanyuan Wu & Qingyun Xu, 2016. "Analysis of Supply Chain under Different Subsidy Policies of the Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Toshimitsu, Tsuyoshi, 2010. "On the paradoxical case of a consumer-based environmental subsidy policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 159-164, January.
    8. Ferrer, Geraldo & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M., 2010. "Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 370-379, June.
    9. Kong, Deyang & Xia, Quhong & Xue, Yixi & Zhao, Xin, 2020. "Effects of multi policies on electric vehicle diffusion under subsidy policy abolishment in China: A multi-actor perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Bulmus, Serra Caner & Zhu, Stuart X. & Teunter, Ruud, 2014. "Competition for cores in remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 105-113.
    11. Heymans, Catherine & Walker, Sean B. & Young, Steven B. & Fowler, Michael, 2014. "Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and load-levelling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 22-30.
    12. Gu, Xiaoyu & Ieromonachou, Petros & Zhou, Li, 2019. "Subsidising an electric vehicle supply chain with imperfect information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 82-97.
    13. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ze-Bin Wang & Yao-Yu Wang & Jian-Cai Wang, 2016. "Optimal distribution channel strategy for new and remanufactured products," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 269-295, June.
    2. Xue, Dongmei & Teunter, Ruud H. & Zhu, Stuart X. & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Entering the high-end market by collecting and remanufacturing a competitor’s high-end cores," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2015. "Strategic and operational decisions under sales competition and collection competition for end-of-use products in remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-20.
    4. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    5. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2016. "A game model of competition for market share between a new good producer and a remanufacturer," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 963-969.
    6. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Dingzhong Feng & Lei Ma & Yangke Ding & Guanghua Wu & Ye Zhang, 2019. "Decisions of the Dual-Channel Supply Chain under Double Policy Considering Remanufacturing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2012. "The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 387-400.
    9. Cetin, Can Baris & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Remanufacturing with innovative features: A strategic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 655-669.
    10. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    11. Han, Xiaohua & Yang, Qianxia & Shang, Jennifer & Pu, Xujin, 2017. "Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 602-616.
    12. De, Arijit & Ray, Ankita & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Is it wise to compete or to collaborate? Remanufacturing business models under collective extended producer responsibility legislation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Yan, Wei & Xiong, Yu & Xiong, Zhongkai & Guo, Nian, 2015. "Bricks vs. clicks: Which is better for marketing remanufactured products?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 434-444.
    15. Rafael Diaz & Erika Marsillac, 2017. "Evaluating strategic remanufacturing supply chain decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(9), pages 2522-2539, May.
    16. Li, Sijie & Zheng, Bin & Jia, Dongfeng, 2024. "Optimal decisions for hybrid manufacturing and remanufacturing with trade-in program and carbon tax," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    17. Xiuqi Jiang & Yini Zheng, 2023. "Pricing decisions and remanufacturing strategies considering consumer recycling behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 755-792, March.
    18. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2013. "Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 153-160.
    19. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    20. Shi, Lian & Sheng, Zhaohan & Xu, Feng, 2015. "The dynamics of competition in remanufacturing: A stability analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 245-253.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321000116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.