Author
Listed:
- Suyuan Wang
(Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Guangxi University of Science and Technology)
- Huaming Song
(Nanjing University of Science and Technology)
- Yi Liao
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Ali Diabat
(New York University Abu Dhabi)
Abstract
Promoting low-carbon innovation (LCI) in firms through government subsidies has emerged as a widely-used policy instrument for achieving sustainable development, directly contributing to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 13 (Climate Action). Considering a complementary supply chain consisting of a supplier and a manufacturer, where the manufacturer assembles components produced in-house and by the supplier into one final product. The government aims to enhance social welfare or LCI product innovation levels. To this end, the government has four potential subsidy strategies: supplier subsidy, manufacturer subsidy, consumer subsidy, and low-carbon infrastructure subsidy. Our research shows that first, although subsidizing low-carbon infrastructure can enhance social welfare, it offers minimal improvement in product LCI. Second, subsidies directed towards suppliers yield limited advancements in social welfare and LCI. Third, when consumers are price-sensitive, subsidizing the manufacturer can maximize both LCI and social welfare. Conversely, when consumers are LCI-sensitive, allocating subsidies toward the supplier is more beneficial. In summary, our research extends the existing literature on complementary supply chain management by identifying the optimal subsidy for the government to achieve its goals, offering tangible insights into practical pathways for realizing SDG 7, 9, 12, and 13 through targeted policy design.
Suggested Citation
Suyuan Wang & Huaming Song & Yi Liao & Ali Diabat, 2025.
"Low-carbon innovation with government subsidy for achieving SDGs in a complementary supply chain,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 352(1), pages 325-349, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:annopr:v:352:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06786-3
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-025-06786-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:352:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-025-06786-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.