IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v116y2008i1p139-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic resolution of conflict situations in collaborative facility design

Author

Listed:
  • Velasquez, Juan D.
  • Lara, Marco A.
  • Nof, Shimon Y.

Abstract

In this work, a new method to resolve conflict situations (Mcr) common in collaborative facility design using computer support tools is developed. The method uses traditional human conflict resolution approaches that have been used successfully by others. It incorporates principles for prevention of conflict perpetuation and escalation to improve design performance, and applies computer-based learning to improve usefulness. A graph model for conflict resolution is used to facilitate conflict modeling and analysis, one of the incorporated principles for prevention of conflict perpetuation and escalation. The performance of the new method have been validated by implementing its conflict resolution capabilities in the Facility Description Language (FDL), a computer tool for collaborative facility design, and by applying Facility Description Language for Conflict Resolution (FDL-CR), to resolve typical aforementioned conflict situations. The results found in this research are: (1) incorporation of principles for prevention of conflict perpetuation and escalation improved effectiveness; (2) implementation of computer-based learning increased usefulness; and (3) integration of conflict detection and resolution resulted in increased effectiveness of the facility design process.

Suggested Citation

  • Velasquez, Juan D. & Lara, Marco A. & Nof, Shimon Y., 2008. "Systematic resolution of conflict situations in collaborative facility design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 139-153, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:116:y:2008:i:1:p:139-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(08)00238-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sycara, Katia P., 1990. "Negotiation planning: An AI approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 216-234, May.
    2. Jinhong Xie & X. Michael Song & Anne Stringfellow, 1998. "Interfunctional Conflict, Conflict Resolution Styles, and New Product Success: A Four-Culture Comparison," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 192-206, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eben-Chaime, Moshe & Bechar, Avital & Baron, Ana, 2011. "Economical evaluation of greenhouse layout design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 246-254, November.
    2. Patalas-Maliszewska Justyna, 2013. "A Model of Knowledge Sharing in Polish Manufacturing Enterprises," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Velásquez, J.D. & Nof, S.Y., 2009. "Best-matching protocols for assembly in e-work networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 508-516, November.
    4. Ehie, Ike C., 2010. "The impact of conflict on manufacturing decisions and company performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 145-157, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    2. Patricia Jaramillo & Ricardo Smith & JoaquÍn Andréu, 2005. "Multi-Decision-Makers Equalizer: A Multiobjective Decision Support System for Multiple Decision-Makers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 97-111, September.
    3. Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2017. "Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 261-272.
    4. Melvin F. Shakun, 1999. "An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 237-249, May.
    5. Le Nguyen, Huu & Larimo, Jorma & Ali, Tahir, 2016. "How do ownership control position and national culture influence conflict resolution strategies in international joint ventures?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 559-568.
    6. Engelen, Andreas, 2010. "Entrepreneurial orientation as a function of national cultural variations in two countries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 354-368, December.
    7. Salo, Ahti A., 1995. "Interactive decision aiding for group decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 134-149, July.
    8. Kaushal Chari & Manish Agrawal, 2007. "Multi-Issue Automated Negotiations Using Agents," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 588-595, November.
    9. Chonlatis Darawong, 2017. "Conflict Management Styles and Interpersonal Conflict Between Marketing and R&D Personnel During the New Product Development Process," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Ray R. Hashemi & Louis A. Le Blanc, 2000. "Resource Allocation through Negotiation and Compromise: A Database Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 325-345, July.
    11. Luminita Zait, 2015. "Modeling The Process Of Assimilation And Operationalization Of The Concept Of Marketing By Romanian Local Organizations," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 21.
    12. Melvin F. Shakun, 2009. "Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 89-117, March.
    13. Cuijpers, Maarten & Guenter, Hannes & Hussinger, Katrin, 2011. "Costs and benefits of inter-departmental innovation collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 565-575, May.
    14. De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2015. "Intergenerational strategy involvement and family firms’ innovation pursuits: The critical roles of conflict management and social capital," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 178-189.
    15. Yan, Tingting & Wagner, Stephan M., 2017. "Do what and with whom? Value creation and appropriation in inter-organizational new product development projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Xiang Qian, 2021. "How Executives Manage Interpersonal Conflicts in Chinese Companies in Germany: Intercultural Difference in Conflict Management Styles," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 182-182, July.
    17. Song, Michael & Di Benedetto, C. Anthony & Parry, Mark E., 2009. "The impact of formal processes for market information acquisition and utilization on the performance of Chinese new ventures," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 314-323.
    18. Sun, Katherine Qianwen & Slepian, Michael L., 2020. "The conversations we seek to avoid," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 87-105.
    19. Gonzalez-Zapatero, Carmen & Gonzalez-Benito, Javier & Lannelongue, Gustavo, 2017. "Understanding how the functional integration of purchasing and marketing accelerates new product development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 770-780.
    20. Fosfuri, Andrea & Rønde, Thomas, 2009. "Leveraging resistance to change and the skunk works model of innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 274-289, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:116:y:2008:i:1:p:139-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.