IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v9y2000i4d10.1023_a1008714120334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Allocation through Negotiation and Compromise: A Database Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ray R. Hashemi

    (University of Arkansas at Little Rock)

  • Louis A. Le Blanc

    (Berry College)

Abstract

In this paper, a resource allocation system is modeled with relational database technology. To allocate resources through a negotiation-based system, two steps of pre-allocation and negotiated allocation have been modeled with a join procedure for two relations. These relations represent the requirements for experiential nursing practice and the availability of such experience at hospitals, respectively. The first step was implemented through a new join operation called α-Distance Join. After the first step, some nursing departments and some hospitals have fully satisfied requirements or fully utilized availability. Other nursing department and hospitals have partial or no satisfaction of requirements or availability, respectively. The second step was implemented through a custom-designed implementation of a user-interface that provides coordinated negotiation among the nodes involved in the system. With the customized interface and join operation, an off-the-shelf or packaged database management system is used. Through this interface, nursing departments and hospitals negotiate until potentially all demands and availability are totally satisfied. This negotiation takes place without face-to-face meetings but with complete knowledge of the entire situation by all parties. This provides the potential for complete fulfillment of nursing experience requirements and total utilization of hospital experience availability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray R. Hashemi & Louis A. Le Blanc, 2000. "Resource Allocation through Negotiation and Compromise: A Database Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 325-345, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:9:y:2000:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1008714120334
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1008714120334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1008714120334
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1008714120334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James K. Sebenius, 1992. "Negotiation Analysis: A Characterization and Review," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 18-38, January.
    2. Vissers, Jan M. H., 1998. "Patient flow-based allocation of inpatient resources: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 356-370, March.
    3. Stinnett, Aaron A. & Paltiel, A. David, 1996. "Mathematical programming for the efficient allocation of health care resources," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 641-653, October.
    4. Robert L. Schmidt, 1996. "A Stochastic Optimization Model to Improve Production Planning and R&D Resource Allocation in Biopharmaceutical Production Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 603-617, April.
    5. Francis G. Wagner & James A. Brody & Douglas S. Ladd & Joe S. Beard, 1996. "Sawtimber Valuation and Sawlog Allocation Through Simulation of Temple-Inland Sawmills," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 3-8, December.
    6. Wiley, Victor D. & Deckro, Richard F. & Jackson, Jack A., 1998. "Optimization analysis for design and planning of multi-project programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 492-506, June.
    7. Sycara, Katia P., 1990. "Negotiation planning: An AI approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 216-234, May.
    8. Antreas D. Athanassopoulos, 1998. "Decision Support for Target-Based Resource Allocation of Public Services in Multiunit and Multilevel Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 173-187, February.
    9. Thanassoulis, E., 1996. "A data envelopment analysis approach to clustering operating units for resource allocation purposes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 463-476, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & Ana M. Romero-Martínez, 2009. "The Decision to Use Alliances as Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Role of Resources and Skills," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 431-448, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giokas, Dimitris I., 2001. "Greek hospitals: how well their resources are used," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 73-83, February.
    2. Lorenzo Castelli & Raffaele Pesenti & Walter Ukovich, 2010. "A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 207-235, January.
    3. Yu, Ming-Miin & Chern, Ching-Chin & Hsiao, Bo, 2013. "Human resource rightsizing using centralized data envelopment analysis: Evidence from Taiwan's Airports," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 119-130.
    4. Linus Nyiwul, 2021. "Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(2), pages 283-305, December.
    5. Yingying Shao & Gongbing Bi & Feng Yang & Qiong Xia, 2018. "Resource allocation for branch network system with considering heterogeneity based on DEA method," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 1005-1025, December.
    6. Patricia Jaramillo & Ricardo Smith & JoaquÍn Andréu, 2005. "Multi-Decision-Makers Equalizer: A Multiobjective Decision Support System for Multiple Decision-Makers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 97-111, September.
    7. Akram Dehnokhalaji & Mojtaba Ghiyasi & Pekka Korhonen, 2017. "Resource allocation based on cost efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1279-1289, October.
    8. Tien-Fu Liang & Tien-Shou Huang & Ming-Feng Yang, 2012. "Application of fuzzy mathematical programming to imprecise project management decisions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1451-1470, August.
    9. McKenna, Claire & Chalabi, Zaid & Epstein, David & Claxton, Karl, 2010. "Budgetary policies and available actions: A generalisation of decision rules for allocation and research decisions," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 170-181, January.
    10. Melvin F. Shakun, 1999. "An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 237-249, May.
    11. Brandeau, Margaret L. & Zaric, Gregory S. & Richter, Anke, 2003. "Resource allocation for control of infectious diseases in multiple independent populations: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 575-598, July.
    12. Jos Timmermans, 2008. "Punctuated equilibrium in a non-linear system of action," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 350-375, December.
    13. Aaron A. Stinnett & John Mullahy, 1998. "Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," NBER Technical Working Papers 0227, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Yang, J.B. & Wong, B.Y.H. & Xu, D.L. & Liu, X.B. & Steuer, R.E., 2010. "Integrated bank performance assessment and management planning using hybrid minimax reference point - DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1506-1518, December.
    15. M. Khodabakhshi & K. Aryavash, 2014. "The fair allocation of common fixed cost or revenue using DEA concept," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 214(1), pages 187-194, March.
    16. Gonçalves, J.F. & Mendes, J.J.M. & Resende, M.G.C., 2008. "A genetic algorithm for the resource constrained multi-project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1171-1190, September.
    17. Birch, Stephen & Gafni, Amiram, 2003. "Economics and the evaluation of health care programmes: generalisability of methods and implications for generalisability of results," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 207-219, May.
    18. Caputo, Andrea, 2016. "Overcoming judgmental biases in negotiations: A scenario-based survey analysis on third party direct intervention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4304-4312.
    19. Morton, Alec, 2014. "Aversion to health inequalities in healthcare prioritisation: A multicriteria optimisation perspective," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 164-173.
    20. Aaron A. Stinnett & A. David Paltiel, 1997. "Estimating CE Ratios under Second-order Uncertainty," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(4), pages 483-489, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:9:y:2000:i:4:d:10.1023_a:1008714120334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.