IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v90y2020ics0264837719307070.html

How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yahui
  • Li, Xiubin
  • He, Huiyan
  • Xin, Liangjie
  • Tan, Minghong

Abstract

The social security theory of cropland, which considers cropland as being the lifeblood or having a social security function, has been accepted in political and academic circles in China since the 1980s. This idea suggests that cropland assets are the most important means of social security for farmers and thus that cropland cannot be marketwise. In reality, the function of cropland as social security depends on its asset value. In recent years, the phenomena of rent-free land transfer and land abandonment have become increasingly prominent in mountainous areas, and the asset value of cropland in such areas has experienced a great decline. The study regards cropland with contract rights as an asset for farmers and systematically estimates the asset value of cropland as social security by using rural permanent observation sites and cost-benefit data compilation of national agricultural products from 1986 to 2015. For most farmers, their cropland has essentially lost original social security function, and they can no longer support basic livelihood demands if they rely only on contracted cropland and the social security theory of cropland must be re-examined. It is difficult to stand against the market-oriented reform of land element according to the above argue, which provides an opportunity for the transfer of cropland contract rights within a certain range. Moreover, it is difficult to dispose the land management right as collateral for the bank and the loan amount of cropland as collateral can be obtained is few; this also requires a moderate transfer of cropland contract rights. To prevent land concentration and merger in rural areas, the government should liberalize the transfer of land contract rights in an appropriate and orderly manner. First, a market access system should be established; for example, cropland contract rights may be only allowed to be transferred among farmers in the early stage. Second, land contract rights may be transferred within counties and then gradually at the levels of prefecture-level cities or provincial level.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & He, Huiyan & Xin, Liangjie & Tan, Minghong, 2020. "How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719307070
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719307070
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nguyen, Tin & Cheng, Enjiang & Findlay, Christopher, 1996. "Land fragmentation and farm productivity in China in the 1990s," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 169-180.
    2. Xie, Hualin & Lu, Hua, 2017. "Impact of land fragmentation and non-agricultural labor supply on circulation of agricultural land management rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 355-364.
    3. TerAvest, Dan & Wandschneider, Philip R. & Thierfelder, Christian & Reganold, John P., 2019. "Diversifying conservation agriculture and conventional tillage cropping systems to improve the wellbeing of smallholder farmers in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 23-35.
    4. Shu, Lei, 2018. "The effect of the New Rural Social Pension Insurance program on the retirement and labor supply decision in China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 135-150.
    5. Xiaohua Yu, 2018. "Engel curve, farmer welfare and food consumption in 40 years of rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 65-77, February.
    6. Wang, Xiaobing & Yamauchi, Futoshi & Otsuka, Keijiro & Huang, Jikun, 2016. "Wage Growth, Landholding, and Mechanization in Chinese Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 30-45.
    7. Sun, Zhanli & You, Liangzhi & Müller, Daniel, 2018. "Synthesis of agricultural land system change in China over the past 40 years," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 473-479.
    8. Peng, Xiaohui & Zhao, Li & Yue, Chengyan & Ahlstrom, David, 2018. "Are different income sources fungible? The effects of agricultural subsidy and disaster relief on household consumption in China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(8), September.
    9. Jacob Ricker-Gilbert & Jordan Chamberlin, 2018. "Transaction Costs, Land Rental Markets, and Their Impact on Youth Access to Agriculture in Tanzania," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 94(4), pages 541-555.
    10. Zhifei Liu & Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie, 2018. "Influence of the Farmer’s Livelihood Assets on Livelihood Strategies in the Western Mountainous Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Guang Wan & Enjiang Cheng, 2001. "Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 183-194.
    12. Klaus Deininger & Daniel Monchuk & Hari K Nagarajan & Sudhir K Singh, 2017. "Does Land Fragmentation Increase the Cost of Cultivation? Evidence from India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 82-98, January.
    13. Yahui Wang & Liangjie Xin & Haozhe Zhang & Yuanqing Li, 2019. "An Estimation of the Extent of Rent-Free Farmland Transfer and Its Driving Forces in Rural China: A Multilevel Logit Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & Lu, Dan & Yan, Jianzhong, 2020. "Evaluating the impact of land fragmentation on the cost of agricultural operation in the southwest mountainous areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Yishao Shi & Qianqian Yang & Liangliang Zhou & Shouzheng Shi, 2022. "Can Moderate Agricultural Scale Operations Be Developed against the Background of Plot Fragmentation and Land Dispersion? Evidence from the Suburbs of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Erwin Knippenberg & Dean Jolliffe & John Hoddinott, 2020. "Land Fragmentation and Food Insecurity in Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1557-1577, October.
    4. Yu, Peiheng & Fennell, Shailaja & Chen, Yiyun & Liu, Hui & Xu, Lu & Pan, Jiawei & Bai, Shaoyun & Gu, Shixiang, 2022. "Positive impacts of farmland fragmentation on agricultural production efficiency in Qilu Lake watershed: Implications for appropriate scale management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Wang, Xiaobing & Yamauchi, Futoshi & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott, 2020. "What constrains mechanization in Chinese agriculture? Role of farm size and fragmentation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Ye, Sijing & Ren, Shuyi & Song, Changqing & Du, Zhenbo & Wang, Kuangxu & Du, Bin & Cheng, Feng & Zhu, Dehai, 2024. "Spatial pattern of cultivated land fragmentation in mainland China: Characteristics, dominant factors, and countermeasures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Do, Manh Hung & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2023. "Land consolidation, rice production, and agricultural transformation: Evidence from household panel data for Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 157-173.
    9. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    10. Kawasaki, Kentaro, 2010. "The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 1-18.
    11. Barati, Ali Akbar & Azadi, Hossein & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2021. "Agricultural land fragmentation in Iran: Application of game theory," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Zhang, Jian & Mishra, Ashok K. & Ma, Xianlei, 2023. "Mechanism of Chinese farmers’ land rental participation: The role of invisible markets and public intervention," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Jia, Lili & Petrick, Martin, 2014. "How does land fragmentation affect off-farm labor supply: panel data evidence from China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 369-380.
    14. Junna Liu & Siyan Zeng & Jing Ma & Yuanyuan Chang & Yan Sun & Fu Chen, 2022. "The Impacts of Rapid Urbanization on Farmland Marginalization: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Mengfei Gao & Rui Pan & Yueqing Ji, 2025. "How Does Migrant Workers’ Return Affect Land Transfer Prices? An Investigation Based on Factor Supply–Demand Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Siyan Zeng & Fengwu Zhu & Fu Chen & Man Yu & Shaoliang Zhang & Yongjun Yang, 2018. "Assessing the Impacts of Land Consolidation on Agricultural Technical Efficiency of Producers: A Survey from Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Wenrong Qian & Dandan Li & Xinjie Shi, 2025. "Competitive or crowding‐out? Estimating spillover effects from large‐scale farms on smallholders in China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 27-44, January.
    18. Huang, Senwei & Zhang, Yaoqi & Zheng, Yifang & Su, Shipeng & Zheng, Jing, 2019. "Inequality and small landholdings: Path dependence, land use and wellbeing," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-66.
    19. Siyi Pei & Sudan Zhao & Xuan Li & Jiahui Li, 2024. "Impacts of Rural–Urban Labour Transfer and Land Transfer on Land Efficiency in China: A Analysis of Mediating Effects," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Xing Ji & Jingwen Xu & Hongxiao Zhang, 2022. "How Does China’s New Rural Pension Scheme Affect Agricultural Production?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719307070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.