IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v82y2023ics0957178723000516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options

Author

Listed:
  • Simeone, Christina E.
  • Gagnon, Pieter
  • Cappers, Peter
  • Satchwell, Andrew

Abstract

The proliferation of smart meter data allows the application of new analytic methods to inform regulatory deliberations. The bill alignment test (BAT) method, which compares the costs allocated to each residential customer with their electric bill, is introduced to help regulators consider how a proposed rate design balances various regulatory criteria. The BAT requires an explicit statement of preferences by policymakers or stakeholders and choices about allocating residual costs unassociated with customer-level causality. The BAT is applied to more than 35,000 smart-meter customer load profiles to assess the trade-offs associated with proposed rate designs. This example demonstrates the impact of residual cost allocation preferences and tariff design choices on proposed tariff evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Simeone, Christina E. & Gagnon, Pieter & Cappers, Peter & Satchwell, Andrew, 2023. "The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:82:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723000516
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178723000516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fares, Robert L. & King, Carey W., 2017. "Trends in transmission, distribution, and administration costs for U.S. investor-owned electric utilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 354-362.
    2. Nicolás Morell Dameto & José Pablo Chaves-Ávila & Tomás Gómez San Román, 2020. "Revisiting Electricity Network Tariffs in a Context of Decarbonization, Digitalization, and Decentralization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Ibtihal Abdelmotteleb & Tomás Gómez & Javier Reneses, 2017. "Evaluation Methodology for Tariff Design under Escalating Penetrations of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Nijhuis, M. & Gibescu, M. & Cobben, J.F.G., 2017. "Analysis of reflectivity & predictability of electricity network tariff structures for household consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 631-641.
    5. Batlle, Carlos & Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo, 2020. "Redesigning residual cost allocation in electricity tariffs: A proposal to balance efficiency, equity and cost recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 257-266.
    6. Severin Borenstein & James B. Bushnell, 2022. "Do Two Electricity Pricing Wrongs Make a Right? Cost Recovery, Externalities, and Efficiency," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 80-110, November.
    7. Janice A. Beecher, 2020. "Policy Note: A Universal Equity–Efficiency Model for Pricing Water," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Passey, Robert & Haghdadi, Navid & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2017. "Designing more cost reflective electricity network tariffs with demand charges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 642-649.
    9. Tim Nelson & Paul Simshauser & Simon Kelley, 2011. "Australian Residential Solar Feed-in Tariffs: Industry Stimulus or Regressive Form of Taxation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 113-129, September.
    10. Paul Simshauser and David Downer, 2016. "On the Inequity of Flat-rate Electricity Tariffs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    11. Kristoffer Christensen & Zheng Ma & Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen, 2021. "Technical, Economic, Social and Regulatory Feasibility Evaluation of Dynamic Distribution Tariff Designs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Neuteleers, Stijn & Mulder, Machiel & Hindriks, Frank, 2017. "Assessing fairness of dynamic grid tariffs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 111-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaughan, Jim & Doumen, Sjoerd C. & Kok, Koen, 2023. "Empowering tomorrow, controlling today: A multi-criteria assessment of distribution grid tariff designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    2. Morell-Dameto, Nicolás & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Gómez San Román, Tomás & Schittekatte, Tim, 2023. "Forward-looking dynamic network charges for real-world electricity systems: A Slovenian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Küfeoğlu, Sinan & Pollitt, Michael G., 2019. "The impact of PVs and EVs on domestic electricity network charges: A case study from Great Britain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 412-424.
    4. Hennig, Roman J. & Ribó-Pérez, David & de Vries, Laurens J. & Tindemans, Simon H., 2022. "What is a good distribution network tariff?—Developing indicators for performance assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    5. Ansarin, Mohammad & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Ketter, Wolfgang & Collins, John, 2020. "The economic consequences of electricity tariff design in a renewable energy era," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Nicolás Morell Dameto & José Pablo Chaves-Ávila & Tomás Gómez San Román, 2020. "Revisiting Electricity Network Tariffs in a Context of Decarbonization, Digitalization, and Decentralization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Beaufils, Timothé & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2019. "Assessing the impact of residential load profile changes on electricity distribution utility revenues under alternative rate structures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Ahmed S. Alahmed & Lang Tong, 2022. "Integrating Distributed Energy Resources: Optimal Prosumer Decisions and Impacts of Net Metering Tariffs," Papers 2204.06115, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    9. Say, Kelvin & John, Michele & Dargaville, Roger, 2019. "Power to the people: Evolutionary market pressures from residential PV battery investments in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Paul Simshauser, 2022. "The 2022 energy crisis: horizontal and vertical impacts of policy interventions in Australia's national electricity market," Working Papers EPRG2216, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    11. Li, Na & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Cost allocation in integrated community energy systems - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Avau, Michiel & Govaerts, Niels & Delarue, Erik, 2021. "Impact of distribution tariffs on prosumer demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Simshauser, P., 2021. "Vulnerable households and fuel poverty: policy targeting efficiency in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2129, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    14. Ansarin, Mohammad & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Ketter, Wolfgang & Collins, John, 2020. "Cross-subsidies among residential electricity prosumers from tariff design and metering infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Simshauser, Paul, 2023. "The 2022 energy crisis: Fuel poverty and the impact of policy interventions in Australia's National Electricity Market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    16. Bergaentzlé, Claire & Jensen, Ida Græsted & Skytte, Klaus & Olsen, Ole Jess, 2019. "Electricity grid tariffs as a tool for flexible energy systems: A Danish case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 12-21.
    17. Simshauser, Paul, 2021. "Vulnerable households and fuel poverty: Measuring the efficiency of policy targeting in Queensland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Freier, Julia & von Loessl, Victor, 2022. "Dynamic electricity tariffs: Designing reasonable pricing schemes for private households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Stawska, Anna & Romero, Natalia & de Weerdt, Mathijs & Verzijlbergh, Remco, 2021. "Demand response: For congestion management or for grid balancing?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    20. Saumweber, Andrea & Wederhake, Lars & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Fridgen, Gilbert & Heleno, Miguel, 2021. "Designing Pareto optimal electricity retail rates when utility customers are prosumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:82:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723000516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.