IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juecon/v138y2023ics0094119023000797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pushing towards shared mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Zakharenko, Roman

Abstract

This paper provides a theoretical argument for preferential treatment of shared vehicles (SV) over private ones by municipal parking authorities. When all parked vehicles are treated equally, multiple equilibria may exist: (i) a “private” one, in which travellers are hesitant to switch to SV because the latter are hard to find, and (ii) a “shared” equilibrium, in which travellers use shared mobility because the city is saturated with vacant SV. The latter equilibrium, if it exists, is shown to yield higher welfare. Municipal parking discounts for SV reduce the amount of investment required for a “big push” towards the shared equilibrium, or even make it the only equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Zakharenko, Roman, 2023. "Pushing towards shared mobility," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juecon:v:138:y:2023:i:c:s0094119023000797
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2023.103609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094119023000797
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jue.2023.103609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fielbaum, Andrés & Tirachini, Alejandro & Alonso-Mora, Javier, 2023. "Economies and diseconomies of scale in on-demand ridepooling systems," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    2. Mohring, Herbert, 1972. "Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 591-604, September.
    3. Zakharenko, Roman, 2023. "Pricing shared vehicles," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    4. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam P. & Martin, Elliot, 2010. "Carsharing Parking Policy: A Review of North American Practices and San Francisco Bay Area Case Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9wq3x6vt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Ricardo Lagos, 2000. "An Alternative Approach to Search Frictions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(5), pages 851-873, October.
    6. Murphy, Kevin M & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1989. "Industrialization and the Big Push," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(5), pages 1003-1026, October.
    7. Zakharenko, Roman, 2016. "The time dimension of parking economics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 211-228.
    8. Bösch, Patrick M. & Becker, Felix & Becker, Henrik & Axhausen, Kay W., 2018. "Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 76-91.
    9. Sangram V. Kadam & Maciej H. Kotowski, 2018. "Multiperiod Matching," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(4), pages 1927-1947, November.
    10. Zakharenko, Roman, 2020. "The merits of privileged parking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 193-209.
    11. Jochem, Patrick & Frankenhauser, Dominik & Ewald, Lukas & Ensslen, Axel & Fromm, Hansjörg, 2020. "Does free-floating carsharing reduce private vehicle ownership? The case of SHARE NOW in European cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 373-395.
    12. Winter, Konstanze & Cats, Oded & Martens, Karel & van Arem, Bart, 2021. "Parking space for shared automated vehicles: How less can be more," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 61-77.
    13. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt9wq3x6vt is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt4q25869t is not listed on IDEAS
    15. van Ommeren, Jos & McIvor, Michael & Mulalic, Ismir & Inci, Eren, 2021. "A novel methodology to estimate cruising for parking and related external costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 247-269.
    16. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhi-Chun Li Author-Name : Wen-Jing Liu Author-Name : André de Palma Author-Name : Yuki Takayama Author-Name : Takao Dantsuji, "undated". "Autonomous vehicles, parking, and urban spatial structure," THEMA Working Papers 2024-09, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    2. Zakharenko, Roman, 2025. "Who should not share? The merits of withholding unused vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Zakharenko, Roman, 2024. "Getting automated mobility on its own track: An economist’s perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Zhi-Chun Li & Wen-Jing Liu & André de Palma & Yuki Takayama & Takao Dantsuji, 2025. "Autonomous vehicles, urban deployment, and welfare effects," THEMA Working Papers 2025-05, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zakharenko, Roman, 2025. "Who should not share? The merits of withholding unused vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Abdelghaffar, Hossam M. & Batista, S.F.A. & Rehman, Abdur & Cao, Jin & Menéndez, Mónica & Jabari, Saif Eddin, 2024. "Comparison of probabilistic cruising-for-parking time estimation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Feng, Jianghong & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan & Cheng, Huibing, 2022. "An integrated decision-making method for locating parking centers of recyclable waste transportation vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2023. "The economics of speed choice and control in the presence of driverless vehicle cruising and parking-as-a-substitute-for-cruising," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Zhang, Kenan & Alonso-Mora, Javier & Fielbaum, Andres, 2025. "What do walking and e-hailing bring to scale economies in on-demand mobility?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Pandey, Ayush & Lehe, Lewis J., 2024. "Congestive mode-switching and economies of scale on a bus route," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Gragera, Albert & Hybel, Jesper & Madsen, Edith & Mulalic, Ismir, 2021. "A model for estimation of the demand for on-street parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    8. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    9. Doll, Claus & Krauss, Konstantin, 2022. "Nachhaltige Mobilität und innovative Geschäftsmodelle," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    10. Xiaojuan Yu & Vincent A.C. van den Berg, 2024. "Human-driven vehicles’ cruising versus autonomous vehicles’ back-and-forth congestion: The effects on traveling, parking and congestion," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-032/VII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 26 Aug 2025.
    11. Militão, Aitan M. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "Optimal fleet size for a shared demand-responsive transport system with human-driven vs automated vehicles: A total cost minimization approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 52-80.
    12. Zakharenko, Roman, 2019. "The economics of parking occupancy sensors," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 14-23.
    13. Yang, Hai & Leung, Cowina W.Y. & Wong, S.C. & Bell, Michael G.H., 2010. "Equilibria of bilateral taxi-customer searching and meeting on networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1067-1083, September.
    14. Yang, Hai & Yang, Teng, 2011. "Equilibrium properties of taxi markets with search frictions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 696-713, May.
    15. Lu, Chengqi & Maciejewski, Michal & Wu, Hao & Nagel, Kai, 2023. "Demand-responsive transport for students in rural areas: A case study in Vulkaneifel, Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Joana Cavadas & António Pais Antunes, 2019. "An optimization model for integrated transit-parking policy planning," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1867-1891, October.
    17. Fielbaum, Andrés & Tirachini, Alejandro & Alonso-Mora, Javier, 2023. "Economies and diseconomies of scale in on-demand ridepooling systems," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    18. Etro, Federico, 2017. "Research in economics and macroeconomics," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 373-383.
    19. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    20. Eliasson, Jonas & Börjesson, Maria, 2022. "Costs and benefits of parking charges in residential areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 95-109.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juecon:v:138:y:2023:i:c:s0094119023000797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622905 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.