IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v99y2024ics0301420724007852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum level of Republic of Korea copper stockpile using disruption risk model

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Kangho
  • Kim, Jinsoo

Abstract

This study evaluates the adequacy of copper stockpiles managed by the Korean government and proposes an economically optimal level from a strategic perspective. The Disruption-Risk model, a methodology that aims to maximize the net benefit of stockpiling by considering potential future demand and supply disruptions, was employed in this analysis. The analysis showed that stockpiling an additional 2400 metric tons above Korea's current target is an economically optimal strategy. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis showed that it is a rational decision for the government to engage in stockpiling activities rather than the private sector. It was found that it is essential to continuously increase and maintain stockpiles in line with Korea's evolving policy direction. The findings of this study employ statistical methods based on historical disruption data, which allows for a comparison with the prevailing approach to calculating stockpiles in Korea, which is based on demand assumptions. These findings can serve as a basis for Korea's copper stockpiling policy and can be utilized to enhance resource security in preparation for possible future scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Kangho & Kim, Jinsoo, 2024. "Optimum level of Republic of Korea copper stockpile using disruption risk model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:99:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724007852
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007852
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:99:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724007852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.