IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v64y2017icp120-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endogenous treatment of residential location choices in transport and land use models: Introducing the MetroScan framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ho, Chinh Q.
  • Hensher, David A.
  • Ellison, Richard

Abstract

Within a random utility maximisation modelling framework, the paper develops a residential location choice model as part of an integrated transport and land use modelling system, called MetroScan – a quick scanning tool to evaluate transport and land use initiatives, including benefit-cost analysis and economic impact analysis. We describe how the developed model is integrated, as an empirically calibrated module, into the behaviourally richer transport and land use modelling system of MetroScan for practical application. A full application of MetroScan modelling system to Sydney West Metro link recently proposed by the New South Wales government is presented as a case study. The results demonstrate how the residential location choice model works with other inter-connected models, such as work and non-work location choices, dwelling tenure and dwelling type, and vehicle fleet size choice embedded in the modelling system, in simulating the impact of transport and housing development on household choices of residential location.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho, Chinh Q. & Hensher, David A. & Ellison, Richard, 2017. "Endogenous treatment of residential location choices in transport and land use models: Introducing the MetroScan framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 120-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:64:y:2017:i:c:p:120-131
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692317302594
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Palma, Andre & Picard, Nathalie & Waddell, Paul, 2007. "Discrete choice models with capacity constraints: An empirical analysis of the housing market of the greater Paris region," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 204-230, September.
    2. Brian H Y Lee & Paul Waddell & Liming Wang & Ram M Pendyala, 2010. "Reexamining the Influence of Work and Nonwork Accessibility on Residential Location Choices with a Microanalytic Framework," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 913-930, April.
    3. Judith Yates & Daniel F. Mackay, 2006. "Discrete Choice Modelling of Urban Housing Markets: A Critical Review and an Application," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(3), pages 559-581, March.
    4. Ho, Chinh Q. & Hensher, David A., 2016. "A workplace choice model accounting for spatial competition and agglomeration effects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 193-203.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, January.
    6. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra R. & Hensher, David A., 2009. "Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 729-748, August.
    7. Moshe Ben-Akiva & John L. Bowman, 1998. "Integration of an Activity-based Model System and a Residential Location Model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 1131-1153, June.
    8. Bowman, J. L. & Ben-Akiva, M. E., 2001. "Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Hensher,David A. & Rose,John M. & Greene,William H., 2015. "Applied Choice Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107465923.
    10. Löchl, Michael & Axhausen, Kay W., 2010. "Modelling hedonic residential rents for land use and transport simulation while considering spatial effects," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(2), pages 39-63.
    11. Schirmer, Patrick & van Eggermond, Michael & Axhausen, Kay, 2014. "The role of location in residential location choice models: a review of literature," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(2), pages 3-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balbontin, Camila & Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh, 2023. "Light commercial vehicles destination choice: Understanding preferences relative to the number of stop and tour-based trip type," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. David A. Hensher & Edward Wei & Wen Liu & Loan Ho & Chinh Ho, 2023. "Development of a practical aggregate spatial road freight modal demand model system for truck and commodity movements with an application of a distance-based charging regime," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1031-1071, June.
    3. Haque, Md Bashirul & Choudhury, Charisma & Hess, Stephane, 2020. "Understanding differences in residential location preferences between ownership and renting: A case study of London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. David A. Hensher & Chinh Quoc Ho & Wen Liu & Edward Wei & Richard Ellison & Kyle Schroeckenthaler & Derek Cutler & Glen Weisbrod, 2020. "MetroScan: A Quick Scan Appraisal Capability to Identify Value Adding Sustainable Transport Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Hensher, David A. & Beck, Matthew J. & Wei, Edward, 2021. "Working from home and its implications for strategic transport modelling based on the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 64-78.
    6. Ho, Chinh Q., 2022. "Can MaaS change users’ travel behaviour to deliver commercial and societal outcomes?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 76-97.
    7. Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh Q. & Ellison, Richard B., 2019. "Simultaneous location of firms and jobs in a transport and land use model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 110-121.
    8. Ho, Chinh Q. & Hensher, David A. & Wang, Shangbo, 2020. "Joint estimation of mode and time of day choice accounting for arrival time flexibility, travel time reliability and crowding on public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward & Liu, Wen, 2021. "Battery electric vehicles in cities: Measurement of some impacts on traffic and government revenue recovery," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schirmer, Patrick & van Eggermond, Michael & Axhausen, Kay, 2014. "The role of location in residential location choice models: a review of literature," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(2), pages 3-21.
    2. Y Nguyen CAO, 2021. "Factors Affecting On Urban Location Choice Decisions Of Enterprises," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 217-224, June.
    3. Sener, Ipek N. & Pendyala, Ram M. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "Accommodating spatial correlation across choice alternatives in discrete choice models: an application to modeling residential location choice behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 294-303.
    4. Haque, Md Bashirul & Choudhury, Charisma & Hess, Stephane, 2020. "Understanding differences in residential location preferences between ownership and renting: A case study of London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Bhat, Chandra R., 2015. "A comprehensive dwelling unit choice model accommodating psychological constructs within a search strategy for consideration set formation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 161-188.
    6. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia & Bergtold, Jason & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Caldas, Marcellus & Granco, Gabriel, 2021. "Deal or No Deal? Analysis of Bioenergy Feedstock Contract Choice with Multiple Opt-out Options and Contract Attribute Substitutability," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315289, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Boyce, Christopher & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Hanley, Nick, 2019. "Personality and economic choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 82-100.
    8. Qian, Lixian & Grisolía, Jose M. & Soopramanien, Didier, 2019. "The impact of service and government-policy attributes on consumer preferences for electric vehicles in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 70-84.
    9. Roy Brouwer & Solomon Tarfasa, 2020. "Testing hypothetical bias in a framed field experiment," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(3), pages 343-357, September.
    10. Michel Beine & Marco Delogu & Lionel Ragot, 2020. "The role of fees in foreign education: evidence from Italy [Determinants of international student migration]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 571-600.
    11. Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Bas Donkers & Jorien Veldwijk & Marcel F. Jonker & Sylvia Buis & Jan Huisman & Patrick Bindels, 2021. "What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(2), pages 269-281, March.
    12. Tamaki Kitagawa & Kenichi Kashiwagi & Hiroko Isoda, 2020. "Effect of Religious and Cultural Information of Olive Oil on Consumer Behavior: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Bernadeta Gołębiowska & Anna Bartczak & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "Energy Demand Management and Social Norms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Minhaj Mahmud & Italo A Gutierrez & Krishna B Kumar & Shanthi Nataraj, 2021. "What Aspects of Formality Do Workers Value? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Bangladesh," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(2), pages 303-327.
    15. Nicolas Jacquemet & Stephane Luchini & Jason Shogren & Verity Watson, 2019. "Discrete Choice under Oaths," Post-Print halshs-02136103, HAL.
    16. Ju-Hee Kim & Younggew Kim & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2021. "Using a choice experiment to explore the public willingness to pay for the impacts of improving energy efficiency of an apartment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1775-1793, October.
    17. Michel Beine & Marco Delogu & Lionel Ragot, 2017. "The Role of Fees in Foreign Education: Evidence From Italy and the United Kingdom," Working Papers 2017-04, CEPII research center.
    18. John Buckell & Vrinda Vasavada & Sarah Wordsworth & Dean A. Regier & Matthew Quaife, 2022. "Utility maximization versus regret minimization in health choice behavior: Evidence from four datasets," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 363-381, February.
    19. Kaplan, Sigal & Shiftan, Yoram & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2012. "Development and estimation of a semi-compensatory model with a flexible error structure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 291-304.
    20. Hensher, David A. & Teye, Collins, 2019. "Commodity interaction in freight movement models for New South Wales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:64:y:2017:i:c:p:120-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.