IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v99y2021ics0305048319302919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal differential subsidy policy design for a workload-imbalanced outpatient care network

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Yewen
  • Li, Na
  • Jiang, Zhibin
  • Xie, Xiaoqing
  • Kong, Nan

Abstract

In many countries, medical services are delivered through a multi-hospital network where a patient may have unlimited choices to different points of access to care. Due to various reasons, such a network may experience substantial workload imbalance. One way to address this challenge relies on government providing higher subsidy to incentivize patients to visit hospitals with low workload/utilization. In this research, we studied the problem of optimal government-to-patient subsidy differential (G2P-SD) policy design. We first formulated the problem with a nonlinear optimization model to minimize the total social cost (i.e., the cost of weighted wait time plus government subsidy spending) subject to the minimum workload requirement. Then we used a discrete choice model with real-world data to identify the significant influence of G2P-SD on patient hospital visit choice and numerically specified the rates of patient arrivals at a multi-hospital outpatient care network accordingly. We next developed a large-scale two-level queuing network to analyze the impact of G2P-SD on patient flows within the service network. We defined funding efficiency as a potential indicator to policy makers for effective budget allocation among various types of patients. Our study verified the effectiveness of modifying the G2P-SD policy, i.e., the total social cost is reduced by 55.99%. Furthermore, our study suggested the benefit of further tailoring the policy design with consideration of influential patient attributes, which leads to a further reduction in wait time at high-workload hospitals in our Shanghai-based case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Yewen & Li, Na & Jiang, Zhibin & Xie, Xiaoqing & Kong, Nan, 2021. "Optimal differential subsidy policy design for a workload-imbalanced outpatient care network," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:99:y:2021:i:c:s0305048319302919
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048319302919
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Harikesh S. Nair, 2011. "Structural Workshop Paper --Discrete-Choice Models of Consumer Demand in Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 977-996, November.
    2. Sabri Çelik & Costis Maglaras, 2008. "Dynamic Pricing and Lead-Time Quotation for a Multiclass Make-to-Order Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1132-1146, June.
    3. Qu Qian & Pengfei Guo & Robin Lindsey, 2017. "Comparison of Subsidy Schemes for Reducing Waiting Times in Healthcare Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(11), pages 2033-2049, November.
    4. Hole, Arne Risa, 2008. "Modelling heterogeneity in patients' preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1078-1094, July.
    5. Scott, Anthony & Watson, M. Stuart & Ross, Sue, 2003. "Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: a stated preference discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 803-814, February.
    6. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Nikolay Osadchiy & Diwas KC, 2017. "Are Patients Patient? The Role of Time to Appointment in Patient Flow," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 469-490, March.
    8. Guangyu Wan & Qinan Wang, 2017. "Two‐tier healthcare service systems and cost of waiting for patients," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 167-183, March.
    9. Garrett van Ryzin & Gustavo Vulcano, 2008. "Simulation-Based Optimization of Virtual Nesting Controls for Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 865-880, August.
    10. Norhaslinda Zainal Abidin & Mustafa Mamat & Brian Dangerfield & Jafri Haji Zulkepli & Md Azizul Baten & Antoni Wibowo, 2014. "Combating Obesity through Healthy Eating Behavior: A Call for System Dynamics Optimization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Denoyel, Victoire & Alfandari, Laurent & Thiele, Aurélie, 2017. "Optimizing healthcare network design under reference pricing and parameter uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 996-1006.
    12. Bijan J. Borah, 2006. "A mixed logit model of health care provider choice: analysis of NSS data for rural India," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(9), pages 915-932, September.
    13. Zhang, Yue & Atkins, Derek, 2019. "Medical facility network design: User-choice and system-optimal models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 305-319.
    14. Siddharth Mahajan & Garrett van Ryzin, 2001. "Inventory Competition Under Dynamic Consumer Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 646-657, October.
    15. Wensing, Michel & Jung, Hans Peter & Mainz, Jan & Olesen, Frede & Grol, Richard, 1998. "A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1573-1588, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Yanju & Che, Yuan, 2021. "Research on Government Logistics Subsidies for Poverty Alleviation with Non-uniform Distribution of Consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Li, Zhong-Ping & Chang, Aichih (Jasmine) & Zou, Zongbao, 2023. "Design mechanism to coordinate a hierarchical healthcare system: Patient subsidy vs. capacity investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Golmohammadi, Davood & Zhao, Lingyu & Dreyfus, David, 2023. "Using machine learning techniques to reduce uncertainty for outpatient appointment scheduling practices in outpatient clinics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Liu & Stacey R. Finkelstein & Margaret E. Kruk & David Rosenthal, 2018. "When Waiting to See a Doctor Is Less Irritating: Understanding Patient Preferences and Choice Behavior in Appointment Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1975-1996, May.
    2. Vishal Gaur & Young-Hoon Park, 2007. "Asymmetric Consumer Learning and Inventory Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 227-240, February.
    3. Biondi, Beatrice & Cornelsen, Laura & Mazzocchi, Mario & Smith, Richard, 2020. "Between preferences and references: Asymmetric price elasticities and the simulation of fiscal policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 108-128.
    4. Peter Sivey, 2012. "The effect of waiting time and distance on hospital choice for English cataract patients," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 444-456, April.
    5. Martine Audibert & Yong He & Jacky Mathonnat, 2013. "Two-Period Comparison of Healthcare Demand with Income Growth and Population Aging in Rural China: Implications for Adjustment of the Healthcare Supply and Development," Working Papers halshs-00846088, HAL.
    6. Martine AUDIBERT & Yong HE & Jacky MATHONNAT, 2017. "What does demand heterogeneity tell us about health care provider choice in rural China?," Working Papers P193, FERDI.
    7. Martine Audibert & Yong He & Jacky Mathonnat, 2013. "Two-Period Comparison of Healthcare Demand with Income Growth and Population Aging in Rural China: Implications for Adjustment of the Healthcare Supply and Development," CERDI Working papers halshs-00846088, HAL.
    8. Martine Audibert & Yong He & Jacky Mathonnat, 2013. "Multinomial and Mixed Logit Modeling in the Presence of Heterogeneity: A Two-Period Comparison of Healthcare Provider Choice in Rural China," Working Papers halshs-00846085, HAL.
    9. Scott, Anthony & Witt, Julia, 2020. "Loss aversion, reference dependence and diminishing sensitivity in choice experiments," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    10. Line Pedersen & Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, 2014. "Preference for practice: a Danish study on young doctors’ choice of general practice using a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(6), pages 611-621, July.
    11. Seokjun Youn & H. Neil Geismar & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4407-4423, December.
    12. Martine Audibert & Yong He & Jacky Mathonnat, 2020. "Dealing with Demand Heterogeneity on Health Care Provider Choice – The Case of Rural China," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(2), pages 258-267.
    13. Chiara Seghieri & Alessandro Mengoni & Sabina Nuti, 2014. "Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(7), pages 773-785, September.
    14. Martine AUDIBERT & Jacky MATHONNAT & Yong HE, 2010. "Income Growth, Price Variation and Health Care Demand: A Mixed Logit Model Applied to Tow-period Comparison in Rural China," Working Papers 201035, CERDI.
    15. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Martine Audibert & Yong He & Jacky Mathonnat, 2011. "Income Growth, Price Variation and Health Care Demand: A Mixed Logit Model Applied to Tow-period Comparison in Rural China," CERDI Working papers halshs-00552192, HAL.
    17. Jiayi Liu & Jingui Xie & Kum Khiong Yang & Zhichao Zheng, 2019. "Effects of Rescheduling on Patient No-Show Behavior in Outpatient Clinics," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 780-797, October.
    18. Martine AUDIBERT & Yong HE & Jacky MATHONNAT, 2017. "What does demand heterogeneity tell us about health care provider choice in rural China?," Working Papers P193, FERDI.
    19. Martine Audibert & Yong He & Jacky Mathonnat, 2020. "Dealing with Demand Heterogeneity on Health Care Provider Choice –The Case of Rural China," Post-Print halshs-02963761, HAL.
    20. Lagarde, Mylene & Erens, Bob & Mays, Nicholas, 2015. "Determinants of the choice of GP practice registration in England: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(4), pages 427-436.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:99:y:2021:i:c:s0305048319302919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.