IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v52y2015icp77-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building a mutually beneficial partnership to ensure backup supply

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng, Amy Z.
  • Xia, Yu

Abstract

In today׳s complex global environment, it is very important for a firm to possess backup supply resource when facing unpredictable disruptions from its primary supply resource. To ensure the actual arrival of backup supply in cases of primary supply disruptions, a purchasing firm needs to work with its backup supplier to forge a strong partnership that not only protects itself, but also assures the backup supplier׳s economic benefit. In this research, we establish the structure of such a partnership based on real business practices. The interactions between the purchasing firm and the backup supplier are examined through a decision-tree approach that takes disruption situations at all levels into consideration. We then design the backup supply contract, find the Nash equilibrium contract parameters, and identify the critical conditions under which such a contractual partnership will be valuable. The contract parameters we find are functions of the moments of the demand distribution, which are independent of specific demand distributions and are easy to be estimated in practice. Our numerical tests support our theoretical results and demonstrate the robustness of the contract with respect to various demand distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng, Amy Z. & Xia, Yu, 2015. "Building a mutually beneficial partnership to ensure backup supply," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 77-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:77-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048314001297
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, YoungWon & Hong, Paul & Roh, James Jungbae, 2013. "Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 75-85.
    2. Li, Jian & Wang, Shouyang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2010. "Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 137-150, March.
    3. Yue, Jinfeng & Xia, Yu & Tran, Thuhang, 2010. "Selecting sourcing partners for a make-to-order supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 136-144, June.
    4. Hou, Jing & Zeng, Amy Z. & Zhao, Lindu, 2010. "Coordination with a backup supplier through buy-back contract under supply disruption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 881-895, November.
    5. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Göker Aydın & Volodymyr Babich & Damian R. Beil, 2012. "Using a Dual-Sourcing Option in the Presence of Asymmetric Information About Supplier Reliability: Competition vs. Diversification," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 202-217, April.
    6. Mark Ferguson & V. Daniel R. Guide , Jr. & Gilvan C. Souza, 2006. "Supply Chain Coordination for False Failure Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 376-393, August.
    7. Aadhaar Chaturvedi & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2011. "Optimal Procurement Design in the Presence of Supply Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 227-243, May.
    8. Senthil Veeraraghavan & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2008. "Now or Later: A Simple Policy for Effective Dual Sourcing in Capacitated Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 850-864, August.
    9. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Göker Ayd{i}n & Volodymyr Babich & Damian R. Beil, 2009. "Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 192-209, February.
    10. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    11. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2014. "Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 83-95.
    12. Yu, Haisheng & Zeng, Amy Z. & Zhao, Lindu, 2009. "Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 788-800, August.
    13. Brian Tomlin, 2009. "Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 192-209, August.
    14. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    15. Xu, He & Shi, Ning & Ma, Shi-hua & Lai, Kin Keung, 2010. "Contracting with an urgent supplier under cost information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 374-383, October.
    16. Giri, B.C., 2011. "Managing inventory with two suppliers under yield uncertainty and risk aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 80-85, September.
    17. Yimin Wang & Wendell Gilland & Brian Tomlin, 2010. "Mitigating Supply Risk: Dual Sourcing or Process Improvement?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 489-510, September.
    18. Sting, Fabian J. & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2010. "Ensuring responsive capacity: How to contract with backup suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 725-735, December.
    19. Ruiz-Torres, Alex J. & Mahmoodi, Farzad, 2007. "The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 104-115, February.
    20. Berger, Paul D. & Gerstenfeld, Arthur & Zeng, Amy Z., 2004. "How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 9-15, February.
    21. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    2. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2015. "On the fair optimization of cost and customer service level in a supply chain under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 58-66.
    3. Zhu, Xiaowei, 2016. "Managing the risks of outsourcing: Time, quality and correlated costs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 121-133.
    4. Heese, H. Sebastian, 2015. "Single versus multiple sourcing and the evolution of bargaining positions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 125-133.
    5. Amin, Gholam R. & Ibn Boamah, Mustapha, 2023. "Modeling business partnerships: A data envelopment analysis approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 329-337.
    6. Merzifonluoglu, Yasemin, 2015. "Risk averse supply portfolio selection with supply, demand and spot market volatility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 40-53.
    7. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2019. "Disruption mitigation and recovery in supply chains using portfolio approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 232-248.
    8. Rajabzadeh, Hamed & Babazadeh, Reza, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach for power pricing in a resilient supply chain considering a dual channel biorefining structure and the hybrid power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1082-1094.
    9. Papachristos, Ioannis & Pandelis, Dimitrios G., 2022. "Newsvendor models with random supply capacity and backup sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1231-1243.
    10. Pan, Wenting & So, Kut C. & Xiao, Guang, 2022. "Benefits of backup sourcing for components in assembly systems under supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 158-171.
    11. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2016. "Integrated supply, production and distribution scheduling under disruption risks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 131-144.
    12. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    2. Qi, Lian & Shi, Jim (Junmin) & Xu, Xiaowei, 2015. "Supplier competition and its impact on firm׳s sourcing strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 91-110.
    3. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    4. Schmitt, Amanda J. & Sun, Siyuan Anthony & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2015. "Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 201-212.
    5. Yang, Yuefeng & Xu, Xuerong, 2015. "Post-disaster grain supply chain resilience with government aid," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 139-159.
    6. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    7. Li, Shanshan & He, Yong & Chen, Lujie, 2017. "Dynamic strategies for supply disruptions in production-inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 88-101.
    8. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    9. Qi, Lian & Lee, Kangbok, 2015. "Supply chain risk mitigations with expedited shipping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 98-113.
    10. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    11. Tadeusz Sawik, 2018. "Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio under delay and disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 760-782, January.
    12. Gupta, Varun & Ivanov, Dmitry & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2016. "Supplier hoarding, government intervention, and timing for post-disaster crop supply chain recovery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 134-160.
    14. Xiao Huang & Tamer Boyacı & Mehmet Gümüş & Saibal Ray & Dan Zhang, 2016. "United We Stand or Divided We Stand? Strategic Supplier Alliances Under Order Default Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1297-1315, May.
    15. Jie Xiang & Juliang Zhang & T. C. E. Cheng & Jose Maria Sallan & Guowei Hua, 2019. "Efficient Multi-Attribute Auctions Considering Supply Disruption," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-28, June.
    16. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Göker Aydın & Volodymyr Babich & Damian R. Beil, 2012. "Using a Dual-Sourcing Option in the Presence of Asymmetric Information About Supplier Reliability: Competition vs. Diversification," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 202-217, April.
    17. Bodendorf, Frank & Sauter, Maximilian & Franke, Jörg, 2023. "A mixed methods approach to analyze and predict supply disruptions by combining causal inference and deep learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Gökçe Esenduran & John V. Gray & Burcu Tan, 2022. "A Dynamic Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management and Extended Payment Terms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1394-1417, March.
    19. Yixin Zhang & Xifu Wang, 2019. "Procurement Strategy with Backup Sourcing under Stochastic Supply Risk," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, March.
    20. Zhu, Stuart X., 2015. "Analysis of dual sourcing strategies under supply disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 191-203.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:77-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.