IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jocoma/v18y2020ics2405851319300601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soybean quality differentials, blending, testing and spatial arbitrage

Author

Listed:
  • William, Wilson
  • Dahl, Bruce
  • Hertsgaard, David

Abstract

One of the fastest-growing markets in agriculture is soybean exports to China and elsewhere. Features of competition for this market are related to quality, logistics cost and performance, all of which are manifested in port-basis values and ocean shipping-cost differentials. It is commonly recognized that soybean quality in the United States' Upper Midwest is deficient relative to soybeans shipped via the Gulf. These regions also compete directly or indirectly with soybeans from the central and southern United States. This study's purpose is to analyze trading opportunities for soybeans which are marketed from the Upper Midwest. A stochastic optimization model was specified for the soybean supply chain in order to capture these phenomena. The model is of a trader and assess impacts of quality variability from different origins and quality requirements. Choices for the trader include testing throughout the system, blending and spatial origination decisions. Some important results include that quality variation is an important problem which affects purchasing and procurement decisions for U.S. soybeans. Shippers can mitigate these risks with testing and targeted logistical strategies, both of which lower the buyer's risk.

Suggested Citation

  • William, Wilson & Dahl, Bruce & Hertsgaard, David, 2020. "Soybean quality differentials, blending, testing and spatial arbitrage," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jocoma:v:18:y:2020:i:c:s2405851319300601
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomm.2019.100095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851319300601
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcomm.2019.100095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2008. "Procurement Strategies to Improve Quality Consistency in Wheat Shipments," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, April.
    2. D. Demcey Johnson & William W. Wilson & Matthew A. Diersen, 2001. "Quality Uncertainty, Procurement Strategies, and Grain Merchandising Risk: Vomitoxin in Spring Wheat," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 102-119.
    3. Updaw, Nelson J. & Bullock, J. Bruce & Nichols, T. E., 1976. "Pricing Soybeans on the Basis of Oil and Protein Content," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-132, December.
    4. Updaw, Nelson J. & Bullock, J. Bruce & Nichols, T.E., Jr., 1976. "Pricing Soybeans On The Basis Of Oil And Protein Content," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-4, December.
    5. de Oliveira, Andrea L. R. & Alvim, Augusto M., 2016. "The supply chain of Brazilian maize and soybeans: the effects of segregation on logistics and competitiveness," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(1), October.
    6. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2002. "Costs And Risks Of Testing And Segregating Gm Wheat," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23480, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    7. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl, 2005. "Costs and Risks of Testing and Segregating Genetically Modified Wheat," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 212-228.
    8. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl, 2005. "Costs and Risks of Testing and Segregating Genetically Modified Wheat," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 212-228.
    9. Skadberg, Kristopher & Wilson, William W. & Larsen, Ryan & Dahl, Bruce, 2015. "Spatial Competition, Arbitrage, and Risk in U.S. Soybeans," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-15, September.
    10. William W. Wilson & Bruce Dahl, 2006. "Costs and Risks of Segregating GM Wheat in Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 54(3), pages 341-359, September.
    11. Carter, Colin A. & Chalfant, James A. & Yavapolkul, Navin & Carroll, Christine L., 2016. "International commodity trade, transport costs, and product differentiation," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 65-76.
    12. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2002. "Costs And Risks Of Testing And Segregating Gm Wheat - Summary," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23502, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    13. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl & D. Demcey Johnson, 2007. "Quality Uncertainty and Challenges to Wheat Procurement," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 55(3), pages 315-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prithviraj Lakkakula & David W. Bullock & William W. Wilson, 2022. "Asymmetric information and blockchains in soybean commodity markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 273-298, March.
    2. Ge, Houtian & Nolan, James & Gray, Richard & Goetz, Stephan & Han, Yicheol, 2016. "Supply chain complexity and risk mitigation – A hybrid optimization–simulation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 228-238.
    3. Gawron, Jana-Christina & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2007. "Costs of Processing Genetically Modified Organisms: Analysis of the Rapeseed and Corn Industries," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7601, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Kym Anderson & Lee Ann Jackson, 2005. "GM crop technology and trade restraints: economic implications for Australia and New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(3), pages 263-281, September.
    5. Matthew Rousu & Wallace E. Huffman & Jason F. Shogren & Abebayehu Tegene, 2007. "Effects And Value Of Verifiable Information In A Controversial Market: Evidence From Lab Auctions Of Genetically Modified Food," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(3), pages 409-432, July.
    6. Ge, Houtian & Gray, Richard & Nolan, James, 2015. "Agricultural supply chain optimization and complexity: A comparison of analytic vs simulated solutions and policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 208-220.
    7. Huffman, Wallace E., 2010. "Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods: traits, labels and diverse information," ISU General Staff Papers 201008270700001120, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. David J. Hertsgaard & William W. Wilson & Bruce Dahl, 2019. "Costs and risks of testing and blending for essential amino acids in soybeans," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 265-280, April.
    9. Huffman, Wallace E. & Shogren, Jason F. & Rousu, Matthew C. & Tegene, Abebayehu, 2003. "Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food Labels in a Market with Diverse Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Gawron, J.-C. & Theuvsen, L., 2008. "Kosten der Verarbeitung gentechnisch veränderter Organismen: Eine Analyse am Beispiel der Raps- und Maisverarbeitung," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    11. Manuey, Sean & Brorsen, B. Wade & Akridge, Jay T., 1991. "A Component Pricing System For Pork," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271067, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Ramesh, Nandini, 2002. "Contract design in soybean production," ISU General Staff Papers 2002010108000018191, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Darren Barber & Jill Hobbs & James Nolan, 2008. "Assessing Producer Stated Preferences for Identity Preservation in the Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(3), pages 243-256, September.
    14. Richey, Bobby Gene, Jr., 1986. "The effect of component pricing on the United States soybean industry," ISU General Staff Papers 1986010108000018101, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Johnson, D. Demcey & Lin, William & Vocke, Gary, 2005. "Economic and welfare impacts of commercializing a herbicide-tolerant, biotech wheat," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 162-184, April.
    16. Wisner, Robert N., 2004. "Round-Up® Ready Spring Wheat: Its Potential Short-Term Impacts on U.S. Wheat Exports Markets and Prices," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12205, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Zhu, Manhong & Schmitz, Andrew & Schmtiz, Troy G., 2016. "Why Has not Genetically Modified Wheat Been Commercialized: A Game Theoretical Perspective," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230796, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Crowe, Bronwyn & Pluske, Johanna M., 2006. "Is it Cost Effective to Segregate Canola in WA?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 14.
    19. Heyder, Matthias & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the agri-food sector: the case of GMOs," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 10(25), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Wilson, William W. & Wilson, Wesley & Dahl, Bruce L., 2009. "Protein and the demand for hard wheats," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(2), pages 1-19.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jocoma:v:18:y:2020:i:c:s2405851319300601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcomm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.