IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/2002010108000018191.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contract design in soybean production

Author

Listed:
  • Ramesh, Nandini

Abstract

Although there is considerable interest in component pricing of soybeans from both the industry and the academia, it is not commonly observed in the soybean industry. In this thesis, the Principal Agent model is used to design a contract between a processor and grower. The processor provides incentives to growers to produce soybeans with higher components (protein and oil) in them. Under the assumption that growers are risk neutral, a contract is designed where the grower faces all the risk in the production of components. The contract also compensates the grower for the yield drag as a result of production of soybeans with higher components in them. Since there is significant difference in the production of components across regions and year, a diffe-2000. Data from the Iowa Soybean yield trials show that an expected social surplus of {dollar}0.15/bu and {dollar}8.02/acre can be generated through a contract with incentives for components.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramesh, Nandini, 2002. "Contract design in soybean production," ISU General Staff Papers 2002010108000018191, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:2002010108000018191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/90b17331-1888-410a-afb3-0f616b768e92/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard K. Perrin, 1980. "The Impact of Component Pricing of Soybeans and Milk," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(3), pages 445-455.
    2. Nelson J. Updaw, 1980. "Social Costs and Benefits from Component Pricing of Soybeans in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 647-655.
    3. Plato, Gerald E., 2001. "The Soybean Processing Decision: Exercising A Real Option On Processing Margins," Technical Bulletins 33567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Updaw, Nelson J. & Bullock, J. Bruce & Nichols, T. E., 1976. "Pricing Soybeans on the Basis of Oil and Protein Content," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-132, December.
    5. Updaw, Nelson J. & Bullock, J. Bruce & Nichols, T.E., Jr., 1976. "Pricing Soybeans On The Basis Of Oil And Protein Content," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-4, December.
    6. Grossman, Sanford J & Hart, Oliver D, 1983. "An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 7-45, January.
    7. Hueth, Brent & Hennessy, David A., 2002. "Contracts and Risk in Agriculture: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5324, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuey, Sean & Brorsen, B. Wade & Akridge, Jay T., 1991. "A Component Pricing System For Pork," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271067, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Richey, Bobby Gene, Jr., 1986. "The effect of component pricing on the United States soybean industry," ISU General Staff Papers 1986010108000018101, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. William, Wilson & Dahl, Bruce & Hertsgaard, David, 2020. "Soybean quality differentials, blending, testing and spatial arbitrage," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    4. Richey, Bobby G., Jr. & Williams, Gary W., 1987. "The Effects of Component Pricing on the U.S. Soybean Industry: A Dynamic Simulation Analysis," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270142, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Calcagno, R. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2004. "Capital Structure and Managerial Compensation : The Effects of Renumeration Seniority," Discussion Paper 2004-120, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Bruinshoofd Allard & Kool Clemens, 2002. "The Determinants of Corporate Liquidity in the Netherlands," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    7. Resende Filho, Moises de Andrade, 2007. "A Principal-Agent Model for Investigating Traceability Systems Incentives on Food Safety," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7897, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Atasi Basu & Randal Elder & Mohamed Onsi, 2012. "Reported earnings, auditor's opinion, and compensation: theory and evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 29-48, March.
    9. Anil Aswani & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Auyon Siddiq, 2019. "Data-Driven Incentive Design in the Medicare Shared Savings Program," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1002-1026, July.
    10. Heidelbach, Olaf & Bokusheva, Raushan & Kussaiynov, Talgat, 2004. "Which type of crop insurance for Kazakhstan? -- Empirical Results," IAMO Discussion Papers 14876, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    11. Sebastian Koehne & Nicola Pavoni & Arpad Abraham, 2011. "Optimal Income Taxation with Asset Accumulation," 2011 Meeting Papers 1161, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    12. Rafal M. Wojakowski & M. Shahid Ebrahim & Aziz Jaafar & Murizah Osman Salleh, 2019. "Can Loan Valuation Adjustment (LVA) approach immunize collateralized debt from defaults?," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 141-158, May.
    13. Qiao Wang, 2023. "Does the Chinese labour force make sufficient efforts? Empirical evidence using non‐parametric analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3262-3280, July.
    14. Nafziger, Julia, 2009. "Timing of information in agency problems with hidden actions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(11), pages 751-766, December.
    15. Anil Arya & Jonathan Glover & Pierre Jinghong Liang, 2004. "Intertemporal aggregation and incentives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 643-657.
    16. Cai, W. & Singham, D.I., 2018. "A principal–agent problem with heterogeneous demand distributions for a carbon capture and storage system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 239-256.
    17. Ohad Kadan & Philip J. Reny & Jeroen M. Swinkels, 2017. "Existence of Optimal Mechanisms in Principal‐Agent Problems," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 769-823, May.
    18. Canice Prendergast, 2000. "The Tenuous Tradeoff Between Risk and Incentives," NBER Working Papers 7815, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Marco Zanobio, 2012. "Aspetti teorici della Corporate Governance," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis1202, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    20. Garvey, Gerald T., 1995. "Why reputation favors joint ventures over vertical and horizontal integration A simple model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 387-397, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:2002010108000018191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.