IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v96y2025ics0047235225000017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How much does criminal history contribute to racial differences in arraignment outcomes?

Author

Listed:
  • Grodensky, Catherine A.
  • Silver, Ian A.
  • DeMichele, Matthew

Abstract

Differences based on race are prevalent across multiple processes and outcomes in the US criminal legal system, and one potential driver is the greater likelihood of Black individuals to possess a criminal history. Decisions made at arraignment about whether to detain an individual pretrial and require bail are typically influenced by judges' perceptions of their culpability and danger to society, which are influenced by criminal history. The current study employs a Structural Equation Model (SEM) to assess the extent to which criminal history mediates the association between race and arraignment outcomes in a sample of >15,000 cases in a large Southeastern county. Findings show that the sample of cases is disproportionately Black when compared with the surrounding population (85 % vs. 45 %, respectively), and that Black individuals are significantly more likely to be detained pretrial than White individuals (24 % vs. 21 %, respectively). SEM results indicate that criminal history accounts for all racial differences in pretrial detention and predicts pretrial detention more strongly among White than Black individuals. Neither criminal history nor race was significantly associated with assignment of bail. Strategies to reduce racial differences in pretrial detention may need to target how past criminal history informs pretrial release decisions at arraignment.

Suggested Citation

  • Grodensky, Catherine A. & Silver, Ian A. & DeMichele, Matthew, 2025. "How much does criminal history contribute to racial differences in arraignment outcomes?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000017
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Arnold & Will Dobbie & Crystal S Yang, 2018. "Racial Bias in Bail Decisions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(4), pages 1885-1932.
    2. David Arnold & Will Dobbie & Peter Hull, 2022. "Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(9), pages 2992-3038, September.
    3. Cadoff, Becca & Wolff, Kevin T. & Chauhan, Preeti, 2021. "Exploring variation in factors associated with increased likelihood of pretrial detention," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Will Dobbie & Jacob Goldin & Crystal S. Yang, 2018. "The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 201-240, February.
    5. Frank McIntyre & Shima Baradaran, 2013. "Race, Prediction, and Pretrial Detention," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 741-770, December.
    6. Huff, Jessica, 2021. "Understanding police decisions to arrest: The impact of situational, officer, and neighborhood characteristics on police discretion," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    8. Goulette, Natalie & Wooldredge, John & Frank, James & Travis, Lawrence, 2015. "From Initial Appearance to Sentencing: Do Female Defendants Experience Disparate Treatment?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 406-417.
    9. Traci Burch, 2015. "Skin Color and the Criminal Justice System: Beyond Black‐White Disparities in Sentencing," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 395-420, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan A Canay & Magne Mogstad & Jack Mount, 2024. "On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision Making," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(4), pages 2135-2167.
    2. Nicolás Grau & Damián Vergara, "undated". "A Simple Test for Prejudice in Decision Processes: The Prediction-Based Outcome Test," Working Papers wp493, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    3. Bharti, Nitin Kumar & Roy, Sutanuka, 2023. "The early origins of judicial stringency in bail decisions: Evidence from early childhood exposure to Hindu-Muslim riots in India," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    5. David Arnold & Will Dobbie & Peter Hull, 2022. "Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(9), pages 2992-3038, September.
    6. Joshua Grossman & Julian Nyarko & Sharad Goel, 2023. "Racial bias as a multi‐stage, multi‐actor problem: An analysis of pretrial detention," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 86-133, March.
    7. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander & Walters, Christopher R., 2024. "Policy evaluation with multiple instrumental variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 243(1).
    8. Eric Chyn & Brigham Frandsen & Emily Leslie, 2025. "Examiner and Judge Designs in Economics: A Practitioner's Guide," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 401-439, June.
    9. McConnell, Brendon & Tan, Kegon Teng Kok & Zapryanova, Mariyana, 2024. "How do parole boards respond to large, societal shocks? Evidence from the 9/11 terrorist attacks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Ash, Elliott & MacLeod, W. Bentley, 2021. "Reducing partisanship in judicial elections can improve judge quality: Evidence from U.S. state supreme courts," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Claudia Williamson Kramer, 2023. "Individualism and racial tolerance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 347-370, December.
    12. Johannes W. Ligtenberg & Tiemen Woutersen, 2024. "Multidimensional clustering in judge designs," Papers 2406.09473, arXiv.org.
    13. Benjamin Feigenberg & Conrad Miller, 2020. "Racial Disparities in Motor Vehicle Searches Cannot Be Justified by Efficiency," NBER Working Papers 27761, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Elliott Ash & Claudia Marangon, 2024. "Judging disparities: Recidivism risk, image motives and in-group bias on Wisconsin criminal courts," Discussion Papers 2024-03, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    15. Elsa Augustine & Johanna Lacoe & Steven Raphael & Alissa Skog, 2022. "The Impact of Felony Diversion in San Francisco," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 683-709, June.
    16. Rehbeck, John, 2023. "Revealed Bayesian expected utility with limited data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 81-95.
    17. Eli Ben-Michael & D. James Greiner & Melody Huang & Kosuke Imai & Zhichao Jiang & Sooahn Shin, 2024. "Does AI help humans make better decisions? A statistical evaluation framework for experimental and observational studies," Papers 2403.12108, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    18. Campbell, Christopher M. & Labrecque, Ryan M. & Weinerman, Michael & Sanchagrin, Ken, 2020. "Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Patricio Dom'inguez & Nicol'as Grau & Dami'an Vergara, 2022. "Discrimination Against Immigrants in the Criminal Justice System: Evidence from Pretrial Detentions," Papers 2202.10685, arXiv.org.
    20. Cristopher Moore & Elise Ferguson & Paul Guerin, 2023. "How accurate are rebuttable presumptions of pretrial dangerousness?: A natural experiment from New Mexico," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 377-408, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:96:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.