IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v99y2025ics0047235225001072.html

Financial pretrial release and innovations in outcome measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Terranova, Victoria A.
  • Slepicka, Jessie

Abstract

Using a sample of released pretrial defendants (n = 1776), we examine the effects of financial release on two conventional pretrial outcomes—new arrest and any failure to appear (FTA)—as well as two proposed, disaggregated outcomes: inconsequential FTA and consequential FTA. The distinction between these subtypes is based on whether a missed court appearance triggers a formal judicial response, which we interpret as a proxy for willfulness. To address potential selection bias, we apply inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW) and estimate average treatment effects on the treated (ATT). Results indicate that financial release significantly reduces the likelihood of inconsequential FTA, associated with unwilful nonappearance (ATT = −0.16, p < .001), but has no effect on consequential FTA, associated with willful nonappearance. Further analyses reveal no significant differences in these effects across self-reported racial/ethnic or sex categories. By bifurcating FTA into conceptually distinct subtypes, our findings suggest that the impact of financial release depends on the nature of court noncompliance and may outweigh concerns about demographic disparities in release decisions. These results offer guidance for reform efforts aimed at minimizing the collateral consequences of the pretrial process by limiting the use of financial conditions to incentivize appearance.

Suggested Citation

  • Terranova, Victoria A. & Slepicka, Jessie, 2025. "Financial pretrial release and innovations in outcome measurement," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001072
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001072
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shawn Bushway & Andrew Jordan & Derek Neal & Steven Raphael, 2025. "Understanding Racial Disparities in Criminal Court Outcomes," NBER Working Papers 33403, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Stephen J Clipper & Robert G Morris & Amanda Russell-Kaplan, 2017. "The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Lowder, Evan M. & Diaz, Carmen L. & Grommon, Eric & Ray, Bradley R., 2021. "Effects of pretrial risk assessments on release decisions and misconduct outcomes relative to practice as usual," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Radha Iyengar, 2007. "An Analysis of the Performance of Federal Indigent Defense Counsel," NBER Working Papers 13187, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Albright, Alex, 2022. "No Money Bail, No Problems? Trade-offs in a Pretrial Automatic Release Program," SocArXiv 42pbz, Center for Open Science.
    6. Sascha O. Becker & Marco Caliendo, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(1), pages 71-83, February.
    7. Arpit Gupta & Christopher Hansman & Ethan Frenchman, 2016. "The Heavy Costs of High Bail: Evidence from Judge Randomization," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 471-505.
    8. Emily Leslie & Nolan G. Pope, 2017. "The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(3), pages 529-557.
    9. repec:osf:socarx:42pbz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Goulette, Natalie & Wooldredge, John & Frank, James & Travis, Lawrence, 2015. "From Initial Appearance to Sentencing: Do Female Defendants Experience Disparate Treatment?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 406-417.
    11. Will Dobbie & Jacob Goldin & Crystal S. Yang, 2018. "The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 201-240, February.
    12. Helland, Eric & Tabarrok, Alexander, 2004. "The Fugitive: Evidence on Public versus Private Law Enforcement from Bail Jumping," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(1), pages 93-122, April.
    13. David S. Abrams & Chris Rohlfs, 2011. "Optimal Bail And The Value Of Freedom: Evidence From The Philadelphia Bail Experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 49(3), pages 750-770, July.
    14. Aurélie Ouss & Megan Stevenson, 2023. "Does Cash Bail Deter Misconduct?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 150-182, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:42pbz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Albright, Alex, 2022. "No Money Bail, No Problems? Trade-offs in a Pretrial Automatic Release Program," SocArXiv 42pbz, Center for Open Science.
    3. Megan T Stevenson, 2018. "Distortion of Justice: How the Inability to Pay Bail Affects Case Outcomes," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 511-542.
    4. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1176-1207 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Will Dobbie & Crystal S. Yang, 2021. "The US Pretrial System: Balancing Individual Rights and Public Interests," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 49-70, Fall.
    6. Pekkurnaz, Didem, 2023. "Causal effect of obesity on the probability of employment in women in Turkey," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    7. Shroff, Ravi & Vamvourellis, Konstantinos, 2022. "Pretrial release judgments and decision fatigue," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117579, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Diaz, Carmen L. & Lowder, Evan Marie & Northcutt Bohmert, Miriam & Ying, Michelle & Hatfield, Troy, 2024. "A retrospective study of the role of probation revocation in future criminal justice involvement," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Johannes W. Ligtenberg & Tiemen Woutersen, 2024. "Multidimensional clustering in judge designs," Papers 2406.09473, arXiv.org.
    10. Jon Kleinberg & Himabindu Lakkaraju & Jure Leskovec & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2018. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 237-293.
    11. Elsa Augustine & Johanna Lacoe & Steven Raphael & Alissa Skog, 2022. "The Impact of Felony Diversion in San Francisco," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 683-709, June.
    12. Amanda Agan & Matthew Freedman & Emily Owens, 2021. "Is Your Lawyer a Lemon? Incentives and Selection in the Public Provision of Criminal Defense," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 103(2), pages 294-309, May.
    13. Eric Chyn & Brigham Frandsen & Emily Leslie, 2025. "Examiner and Judge Designs in Economics: A Practitioner's Guide," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 401-439, June.
    14. Jason Baron, E. & Jacob, Brian & Ryan, Joseph, 2023. "Pretrial juvenile detention," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Campbell, Christopher M. & Labrecque, Ryan M. & Weinerman, Michael & Sanchagrin, Ken, 2020. "Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Premkumar, Deepak & Skelton, Andrew & Lofstrom, Magnus & Cremin, Sean, 2025. "What Happened When California Suspended Bail during COVID?," IZA Discussion Papers 17710, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. St. Louis, Stacie, 2022. "Bail denied or bail too high? Disentangling cumulative disadvantage by pretrial detention type," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Angela Zhou & Andrew Koo & Nathan Kallus & Rene Ropac & Richard Peterson & Stephen Koppel & Tiffany Bergin, 2021. "An Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of New York's Bail Reform on Crime Using Synthetic Controls," Papers 2111.08664, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    19. Alexander Lundberg, 2024. "Do prosecutors induce the innocent to plead guilty?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(2), pages 650-674, April.
    20. Emily Owens & CarlyWill Sloan, 2023. "Can text messages reduce incarceration in rural and vulnerable populations?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 992-1009, September.
    21. Stephen J Clipper & Robert G Morris & Amanda Russell-Kaplan, 2017. "The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    22. Bharti, Nitin Kumar & Roy, Sutanuka, 2023. "The early origins of judicial stringency in bail decisions: Evidence from early childhood exposure to Hindu-Muslim riots in India," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.