IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v62y2009i12p1335-1341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detours and frolics on the Internet: Employer liability and management control of cybertorts

Author

Listed:
  • Aalberts, Robert J.
  • Hames, David S.
  • Thistle, Paul D.

Abstract

Most employers are aware of their legal right to monitor employees' computer activities, and they are increasingly doing so. Yet, few of those who do monitor are aware that exercising this right may impose a legal duty to monitor prudently in order to protect third parties and to report criminal activity to the appropriate authorities. This paper briefly examines employers' legal right to monitor their employees' computer activities. Our subsequent analysis of the ruling in Doe v. XYC Corp. [Doe v XYC Corp., 382 N.J. Super. 122, 887 A.2d 1156 (2005)]. illustrates that those businesses that do assert their rights to monitor may assume a duty to report child pornography to the authorities, as well as a duty of reasonable care when reacting to their employees engaging in so-called cybertorts. We discuss how this ruling may extend the doctrines of 'detours' and 'frolics' into cyberspace. We also discuss the potential for employers' liability for other cybercrimes and cybertorts committed by their employees. We conclude by examining the contours of computer monitoring policies that effectively serve employers' risk management objectives without unduly invading employees' privacy, and the likely consequences of failing to achieve such a balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Aalberts, Robert J. & Hames, David S. & Thistle, Paul D., 2009. "Detours and frolics on the Internet: Employer liability and management control of cybertorts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1335-1341, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:62:y:2009:i:12:p:1335-1341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(08)00282-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenberg, Jerald, 1993. "Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 81-103, February.
    2. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    3. Earley, P. Christopher, 1988. "Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 50-64, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Obesso Arias, María de las Mercedes & Pérez Rivero, Carlos Alberto & Carrero Márquez, Oliver, 2023. "Artificial intelligence to manage workplace bullying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dezső, Linda & Loewenstein, George, 2019. "Self-serving invocations of shared and asymmetric history in negotiations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Kim, Jungkeun, 2019. "The impact of different price promotions on customer retention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 95-102.
    3. Zhiyi Zhuo, 2019. "Research on using Six Sigma management to improve bank customer satisfaction," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    5. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    6. Eric A. Fong, 2010. "Relative CEO Underpayment and CEO Behaviour Towards R&D Spending," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1095-1122, September.
    7. James J. Lavelle & Robert Folger & Jennifer G. Manegold, 2016. "Delivering Bad News: How Procedural Unfairness Affects Messengers’ Distancing and Refusals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 43-55, June.
    8. Harjinder Gill & John Meyer & Kibeom Lee & Kang-Hyun Shin & Chang-Young Yoon, 2011. "Affective and continuance commitment and their relations with deviant workplace behaviors in Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 595-607, September.
    9. Greenberg, Jerald, 2002. "Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 985-1003, September.
    10. Pierre-Nicolas Schwab, 2015. "Online complaint handling practices: Company strategies and their effects upon post-complaint satisfaction," Working Papers CEB 15-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Gino, Francesca & Pierce, Lamar, 2009. "The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 142-155, July.
    12. Kedar Bhatt, 2020. "Measuring service fairness and its impact on service quality and satisfaction: a study of Indian Banking Services," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 35-44, June.
    13. M. Krishna Moorthy & Felix Chee-Yew Ng & Mahendra Kumar Chelliah & King-Tak Yew & Lee Ah Suat, 2013. "Employees’ Theft Behaviour: A Study in Large Retail Organisations in Kuala Lumpur," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    14. Panina, Daria & Aiello, John R., 2005. "Acceptance of electronic monitoring and its consequences in different cultural contexts: A conceptual model," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 269-292, June.
    15. Danping Shao & Erhua Zhou & Peiran Gao, 2019. "Influence of Perceived Socially Responsible Human Resource Management on Task Performance and Social Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Talya D. Thomas, 2018. "Homeownership: What Does Houston Habitat for Humanity Homeowners Have to Say?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Juan M. Andrade & Elias Ramirez, 2019. "Organizational Justice and Work-family Conflict in Colombian Organizations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 139-153.
    18. Aparna Sundar & Edita S. Cao, 2020. "Punishing Politeness: The Role of Language in Promoting Brand Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 39-60, June.
    19. Skarlicki, Daniel P. & Turner, R. Anthony, 2014. "Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 34-46.
    20. Bernadine Van Gramberg & Julian Teicher & Greg J. Bamber & Brian Cooper, 2020. "Employee Voice, Intention to Quit, and Conflict Resolution: Evidence from Australia," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 393-410, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:62:y:2009:i:12:p:1335-1341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.