IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v206y2026ics0148296325007428.html

On the edge of green: how environmental performance benchmarks drive corporate greenwashing behavior?

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Yuxin
  • Abdallah, Sana Ben
  • Saidane, Dhafer

Abstract

Despite growing attention to sustainability, many firms continue to engage in greenwashing, or symbolic disclosures that lack substantive backing. This study develops a reference-dependent framework grounded in prospect theory to explain when and why firms engage in greenwashing. Using international panel data on 6944 firms from 2009 to 2023, we show that greenwashing varies depending on a firm’s position relative to environmental performance benchmarks: firms below the benchmark are more likely to greenwash as environmental performance improves, while those above the benchmark reduce symbolic disclosures. This asymmetry is amplified in weak regulatory environments. We further find that attaining externally observable benchmarks (e.g., industry standards) is more effective than internal ones in discouraging greenwashing. These findings provide new behavioral and institutional insights into the strategic use of environmental, social, and governance communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Yuxin & Abdallah, Sana Ben & Saidane, Dhafer, 2026. "On the edge of green: how environmental performance benchmarks drive corporate greenwashing behavior?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007428
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325007428
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.