IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v201y2025ics0148296325005636.html

Are negative reviews always helpful? effects of emotional arousal on the usefulness of negative reviews and how merchants should respond

Author

Listed:
  • Du, Zhanhe
  • Chai, Hu
  • Lu, Haijiao
  • Li, Lixu
  • Lowry, Paul Benjamin

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving digital marketplace, understanding consumer behavior in response to negative reviews is of considerable practical and academic importance. Negative reviews influence consumer decision-making, but not all are accurate or helpful. Moreover, the interplay between emotional arousal and the perceived utility of negative reviews, particularly for high-risk purchases and costly products, remains largely unexplored. Addressing this gap, our study leverages attribution theory to scrutinize the curvilinear relationship between emotional arousal and the usefulness of negative reviews in high-risk purchases. We employed a robust mixed-methods design comprising three different studies aimed to triangulate further and understand these phenomena: Study 1 involved an objective content analysis of 6,147 negative reviews from prominent Chinese e-commerce platforms; Study 2 was a controlled scenario-based experiment with 99 consumers, aimed to test the underlying causal relationships; finally, Study 3 involved in-depth qualitative interviews and coding with 60 consumers. Our findings demonstrate an inverted U-shaped relationship between emotional arousal and the perceived utility of negative reviews in high-risk purchase scenarios. This relationship is mediated by prosocial motives, emphasizing that emotionally aroused consumers will likely find negative reviews helpful only up to a certain point, after which the utility diminishes. Notably, positive merchant responses serve as a crucial moderating variable in the emotional arousal-negative review usefulness relationship and the connection between prosocial motives and review usefulness. Our study advances the online review literature by offering nuanced insights into the complex relationship between emotional arousal and the utility of negative reviews in high-risk purchase scenarios. Our results have immediate implications for e-commerce platforms, enabling them to convert the challenge posed by negative reviews into actionable opportunities through informed response strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Du, Zhanhe & Chai, Hu & Lu, Haijiao & Li, Lixu & Lowry, Paul Benjamin, 2025. "Are negative reviews always helpful? effects of emotional arousal on the usefulness of negative reviews and how merchants should respond," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325005636
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005636
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Breitsohl, Jan & Garrod, Brian, 2016. "Assessing tourists' cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to an unethical destination incident," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 209-220.
    2. Ruiz-Mafe, Carla & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Curras-Perez, Rafael, 2018. "The role of emotions and conflicting online reviews on consumers' purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 336-344.
    3. Bolton, Lisa E. & Mattila, Anna S., 2015. "How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Consumer Response to Service Failure in Buyer–Seller Relationships?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 140-153.
    4. Paul-Arthur Dreyfus & Foivos Psarommatis & Gokan May & Dimitris Kiritsis, 2022. "Virtual metrology as an approach for product quality estimation in Industry 4.0: a systematic review and integrative conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(2), pages 742-765, January.
    5. Purnawirawan, Nathalia & Eisend, Martin & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Dens, Nathalie, 2015. "A Meta-analytic Investigation of the Role of Valence in Online Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-27.
    6. Alison Jing Xu & Robert S. Wyer, 2010. "Puffery in Advertisements: The Effects of Media Context, Communication Norms, and Consumer Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 329-343, August.
    7. Song, Yan & Xiu, Yifan & Zhou, Liping & Wang, Jingyuan, 2024. "Implementing multi-attribute utility theory in service recovery: An operational management perspective on online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Elizabeth Cowley & Christina I Anthony & Darren W DahlEditor & Amna KirmaniEditor & Peter R DarkeAssociate Editor, 2019. "Deception Memory: When Will Consumers Remember Their Lies?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(1), pages 180-199.
    9. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    10. Li, Xinwei & Xu, Mao & Zeng, Wenjuan & Tse, Ying Kei & Chan, Hing Kai, 2023. "Exploring customer concerns on service quality under the COVID-19 crisis: A social media analytics study from the retail industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Herr, Paul M & Kardes, Frank R & Kim, John, 1991. "Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 454-462, March.
    12. Ed Hyatt & Morgan Harvey & Matthew Pointon & Perla Innocenti, 2021. "Whither wilderness? An investigation of technology use by long‐distance backpackers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 683-698, June.
    13. Lena Steinhoff & Denni Arli & Scott Weaven & Irina V. Kozlenkova, 2019. "Online relationship marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 369-393, May.
    14. van Noort, Guda & Willemsen, Lotte M., 2012. "Online Damage Control: The Effects of Proactive Versus Reactive Webcare Interventions in Consumer-generated and Brand-generated Platforms," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 131-140.
    15. Dezhi Yin & Sabyasachi Mitra & Han Zhang, 2016. "Research Note—When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 131-144, March.
    16. Sabine Matook & Susan A Brown & Johanna Rolf, 2015. "Forming an intention to act on recommendations given via online social networks," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 76-92, January.
    17. Dina Mayzlin & Yaniv Dover & Judith Chevalier, 2014. "Promotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2421-2455, August.
    18. Felbermayr, Armin & Nanopoulos, Alexandros, 2016. "The Role of Emotions for the Perceived Usefulness in Online Customer Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 60-76.
    19. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Usrey, Bryan, 2021. "The impact of influencer motives and commonness perceptions on follower reactions toward incentivized reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 531-548.
    20. Nanda Kumar & Izak Benbasat, 2006. "Research Note: The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 425-439, December.
    21. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    22. Leif Brandes & Yaniv Dover, 2022. "Offline Context Affects Online Reviews: The Effect of Post-Consumption Weather [Mobile Ad Effectiveness: Hyper-Contextual Targeting with Crowdedness]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(4), pages 595-615.
    23. Marder, Ben & Angell, Rob & Boyd, Eric, 2023. "How and why (imagined) online reviews impact frontline retail encounters," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 265-279.
    24. Dorte Henriksen, 2019. "Alphabetic or Contributor Author Order. What Is the Norm in Danish Economics and Political Science and Why?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(6), pages 607-618, June.
    25. Xi Niu & Bradley Hemminger, 2015. "Analyzing the interaction patterns in a faceted search interface," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(5), pages 1030-1047, May.
    26. Amanda Belarmino & Elizabeth Whalen & Yoon Koh & John T. Bowen, 2019. "Comparing guests’ key attributes of peer-to-peer accommodations and hotels: mixed-methods approach," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 1-7, January.
    27. Jie Ren & Jeffrey V. Nickerson, 2019. "Arousal, valence, and volume: how the influence of online review characteristics differs with respect to utilitarian and hedonic products," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 272-290, May.
    28. Jonah Berger & Matthew D Rocklage & Grant Packard, 2022. "Expression Modalities: How Speaking Versus Writing Shapes Word of Mouth [Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(3), pages 389-408.
    29. Zhang, Ning & Fan, Xing & He, LiFeng & Cheng, Xin & Zhang, Liang & Liu, Rong, 2024. "The impact of the Seller's facial image on consumer purchase behavior in peer-to-peer accommodation platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    30. Davide Proserpio & Georgios Zervas, 2017. "Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 645-665, September.
    31. Reimer, Thomas & Benkenstein, Martin, 2018. "Not just for the recommender: How eWOM incentives influence the recommendation audience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 11-21.
    32. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Fang Wu, 2010. "Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 547-561, May.
    33. Chuanmei Zhou & Shuiqing Yang & Yuangao Chen & Shasha Zhou & Yixiao Li & Atika Qazi, 2023. "How does topic consistency affect online review helpfulness? The role of review emotional intensity," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2943-2978, December.
    34. Yu, Alisa & Berg, Justin M. & Zlatev, Julian J., 2021. "Emotional acknowledgment: How verbalizing others’ emotions fosters interpersonal trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 116-135.
    35. Ashish Kumar Jha & Snehal Shah, 2019. "Social Influence on Future Review Sentiments: An Appraisal-Theoretic View," Post-Print hal-02159359, HAL.
    36. Marius Johnen & Oliver Schnittka, 2019. "When pushing back is good: the effectiveness of brand responses to social media complaints," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 858-878, September.
    37. Sarah G. Moore, 2015. "Attitude Predictability and Helpfulness in Online Reviews: The Role of Explained Actions and Reactions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 42(1), pages 30-44.
    38. Judith A. Chevalier & Yaniv Dover & Dina MayzlinDina Mayzlin, 2018. "Channels of Impact: User Reviews When Quality Is Dynamic and Managers Respond," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 688-709, September.
    39. Jin Li & Yulan Zhang & Jianping Li & Jiangze Du, 2023. "The Role of Sentiment Tendency in Affecting Review Helpfulness for Durable Products: Nonlinearity and Complementarity," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1459-1477, August.
    40. Kim, Junyong & Gupta, Pranjal, 2012. "Emotional expressions in online user reviews: How they influence consumers' product evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 985-992.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn (Nui) & Grace, Debra & Ross, Mitchell, 2021. "Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 631-640.
    2. Ismagilova, Elvira & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Slade, Emma, 2020. "Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Pocchiari, Martina & Proserpio, Davide & Dover, Yaniv, 2025. "Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 275-297.
    4. Hai-Anh Tran & Yuliya Strizhakova & Bach Nguyen & Samuel G. B. Johnson, 2025. "Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 825-853, May.
    5. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    6. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    7. Ao Shen & Peng Wang & Yongyuan Ma, 2022. "When crowding‐in and when crowding‐out? The boundary conditions on the relationship between negative online reviews and online sales," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2016-2032, September.
    8. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    9. HanByeol Stella Choi & Junyeong Lee & Chanhee Kwak & Jinyoung Min, 2025. "The role of review responses in shaping online review content and review space dynamics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Jiajun Wu & Jun Ye & Junhong Chu, 2026. "Soothing the unsatisfied or pleasing the satisfied? The effects of managerial responses to positive versus negative reviews on customer ratings and financial performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 70-90, February.
    11. Chan, Haksin & Yang, Morgan X. & Zeng, Kevin J., 2022. "Bolstering ratings and reviews systems on multi-sided platforms: A co-creation perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 208-217.
    12. Hülya Karaman, 2021. "Online Review Solicitations Reduce Extremity Bias in Online Review Distributions and Increase Their Representativeness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4420-4445, July.
    13. Uttara Ananthakrishnan & Davide Proserpio & Siddhartha Sharma, 2023. "I Hear You: Does Quality Improve with Customer Voice?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1143-1161, November.
    14. Erfan Rezvani & Christian Rojas, 2022. "Firm responsiveness to consumers' reviews: The effect on online reputation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 898-922, November.
    15. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    16. Kawaf, Fatema & Istanbulluoglu, Doga, 2019. "Online fashion shopping paradox: The role of customer reviews and facebook marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 144-153.
    17. Meek, Stephanie & Wilk, Violetta & Lambert, Claire, 2021. "A big data exploration of the informational and normative influences on the helpfulness of online restaurant reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 354-367.
    18. Stuhldreier, Sanja Maria, 2024. "Unlocking (re)purchase potential through corporate responsiveness on social networks: The role of perceived customer orientation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Alberto Lopez & Eva Guerra & Beatriz Gonzalez & Sergio Madero, 2020. "Consumer sentiments toward brands: the interaction effect between brand personality and sentiments on electronic word of mouth," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 203-223, December.
    20. Kim, Jong Min & Jun, Mina & Kim, Chung K., 2018. "The Effects of Culture on Consumers' Consumption and Generation of Online Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 134-150.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325005636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.