IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v194y2025ics0148296325001742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When thinking you’re good makes you dumber: An investigation of consumers’ earned dogmatism

Author

Listed:
  • Chaney, Damien
  • Trelohan, Magali
  • Moroz, David

Abstract

While dogmatism has been regarded as a personality trait in consumer research, this study delves into earned dogmatism, specifically dogmatism acquired by consumers through the accumulation of knowledge on a particular subject, leading to closed-minded cognition. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that subjective knowledge correlates with closed-mindedness. The data also indicate that objective knowledge moderates the relationship between subjective knowledge and closed-minded cognition, such that individuals exhibiting the highest degree of closed-mindedness are those with a significant miscalibration of their knowledge, characterized by low objective knowledge and high subjective knowledge. Finally, our findings underscore the paradox in which dogmatic individuals engage in word-of-mouth about a subject despite their closed-mindedness toward it. While previous research has demonstrated that consumer knowledge can have negative consequences for individuals, we suggest that these detrimental effects may also extend to the brands themselves, potentially leading to the dissemination of outdated or misleading information.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaney, Damien & Trelohan, Magali & Moroz, David, 2025. "When thinking you’re good makes you dumber: An investigation of consumers’ earned dogmatism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001742
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001742
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.