IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v13y1985i4p301-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Fulk, Janet
  • Brief, Arthur P.
  • Barr, Steve H.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Fulk, Janet & Brief, Arthur P. & Barr, Steve H., 1985. "Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 301-313, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:13:y:1985:i:4:p:301-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0148-2963(85)90003-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bellavance, François & Landry, Suzanne & Schiehll, Eduardo, 2013. "Procedural justice in managerial performance evaluation: Effects of subjectivity, relationship quality, and voice opportunity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 149-166.
    2. Shalini Srivastava, 2013. "Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment Relationship: Effect of Personality Variables," Vision, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-167, June.
    3. Matevž Rašković & Maja Makovec Brenčič & Barbara Moerec, 2011. "Trust and management-to-employee communication in Slovenian companies: Some evidence from the current economic crisis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 23(2), pages 165-187.
    4. Lambert, Eric, 2003. "The impact of organizational justice on correctional staff," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-168.
    5. Kurt T. Dirks & Donald L. Ferrin, 2001. "The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 450-467, August.
    6. Kanat-Maymon, Yaniv & Yaakobi, Erez & Roth, Guy, 2018. "Motivating deference: Employees' perception of authority legitimacy as a mediator of supervisor motivating styles and employee work-related outcomes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 769-783.
    7. Hartmann, Frank G. H., 2000. "The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(4-5), pages 451-482, May.
    8. Wöhlert, Lydia, 2021. "Fairness bei der Performancebewertung in Supply Chains: Eine mehrstufige Literaturanalyse zum State of the Art," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 1, number 12021.
    9. Grund, Christian & Soboll, Alexandra, 2023. "Monetary Rewards, Hierarchy Level and Working Hours as Drivers of Employees' Self-Evaluations," IZA Discussion Papers 16042, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Flora F. T. Chiang & Thomas A. Birtch, 2010. "Appraising Performance across Borders: An Empirical Examination of the Purposes and Practices of Performance Appraisal in a Multi‐Country Context," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7), pages 1365-1393, November.
    11. Ronald C. Nyhan & Herbert A. Marlowe JR, 1997. "Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(5), pages 614-635, October.
    12. Musab Isik & Kursad Timuroglu & Yussuf Aliyev, 2015. "The Relationship between Teamwork and Organizational Trust:Relations Between Cognitive, Affective and Action Loyalty," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 4(1), pages 113-132, January.
    13. Schminke, Marshall & Cropanzano, Russell & Rupp, Deborah E., 2002. "Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 881-905, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:13:y:1985:i:4:p:301-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.