IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v107y2020icp1-12.html

The interactive effect of power distance belief and consumers’ status on preference for national (vs. private-label) brands

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jessie J.
  • Torelli, Carlos J.
  • Lalwani, Ashok K.

Abstract

Private-label brands have been offered as an alternative to national brands. Given the widespread belief that private-label brands offer good value, it is surprising that the market share of such brands has remained low in most countries. In the current research, we examine the interactive effect of power distance belief (PDB) – the acceptance and expectation of hierarchies and inequalities in society – and consumers’ status on their preference for private-label (vs. national) brands. Results revealed that in high-PDB contexts, low (vs. high) status consumers are more attracted to national brands. Interestingly, this effect emerged only for products low, compared to high, in symbolism. Furthermore, results suggest that the interactive effect of PDB and consumers’ status on brand preferences is driven by consumers’ status consumption needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jessie J. & Torelli, Carlos J. & Lalwani, Ashok K., 2020. "The interactive effect of power distance belief and consumers’ status on preference for national (vs. private-label) brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:107:y:2020:i:c:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319305910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:tsa:wpaper:00106mkt is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Robert L. Steiner, 2004. "The Nature and Benefits of National Brand/Private Label Competition," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 24(2), pages 105-127, March.
    3. Ashok K. Lalwani, 2009. "The Distinct Influence of Cognitive Busyness and Need for Closure on Cultural Differences in Socially Desirable Responding," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 305-316.
    4. Ashok K. Lalwani & Sharon Shavitt, 2013. "You Get What You Pay For? Self-Construal Influences Price-Quality Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 255-267.
    5. Jere R. Behrman & Paul Taubman, 1990. "The Intergenerational Correlation Between Children'S Adult Earnings And Their Parents' Income: Results From The Michigan Panel Survey Of Income Dynamics," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 36(2), pages 115-127, June.
    6. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & André Bonfrer & Inseong Song, 2002. "Investigating the Effects of Store-Brand Introduction on Retailer Demand and Pricing Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1242-1267, October.
    7. Quelch, John A., 1987. "Marketing the premium product," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 38-45.
    8. Francis Bloch & Vijayendra Rao & Sonalde Desai, 2004. "Wedding Celebrations as Conspicuous Consumption: Signaling Social Status in Rural India," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 39(3).
    9. Karen Page Winterich & Yinlong Zhang, 2014. "Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 274-293.
    10. Xavier Drèze & Joseph C. Nunes, 2009. "Feeling Superior: The Impact of Loyalty Program Structure on Consumers' Perceptions of Status," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 890-905, April.
    11. Ashok K. Lalwani & Lura Forcum, 2016. "Does a Dollar Get You a Dollar’s Worth of Merchandise? The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Price-Quality Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 317-333.
    12. repec:bla:revinw:v:36:y:1990:i:2:p:115-27 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jennifer Edson Escalas & James R. Bettman, 2005. "Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 378-389, December.
    14. Huachao Gao & Karen Page Winterich & Yinlong Zhang, 2016. "All That Glitters Is Not Gold: How Others’ Status Influences the Effect of Power Distance Belief on Status Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 265-281.
    15. Katherine White & Darren W. Dahl, 2007. "Are All Out-Groups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 525-536, June.
    16. Mbaye Fall Diallo & Jean-Louis Chandon & Gérard Cliquet & Jean Philippe, 2013. "Factors influencing consumer behaviour towards store brands: evidence from the French market," Post-Print hal-01796015, HAL.
    17. Jonah Berger & Chip Heath, 2007. "Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 121-134, June.
    18. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2008. "Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 257-267, April.
    19. Dahee Han & Ashok K. Lalwani & Adam Duhachek, 2017. "Power Distance Belief, Power, and Charitable Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 182-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jessie J. & Lalwani, Ashok K., 2019. "The distinct influence of power distance perception and power distance values on customer satisfaction in response to loyalty programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 580-596.
    2. Park, Sehoon & Kim, Chaeyeong & Park, Jane, 2023. "How power distance belief, self-construal, and relationship norms impact conspicuous consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Yuelong, Zeng & Jingwen, Liu & Wenting, Feng, 2025. "Integrating high and low-status signals in product design: Effects on luxury brand preference," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Wang, Xuehua & Wang, Xiaoyu & Fang, Xiang & Jiang, Qingyun, 2018. "Power distance belief and brand personality evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 89-99.
    5. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    6. Pingping Wang & Xin Xia & Kaiyue Liang, 2026. "Local brand aversion or aspiration? The influence of socioeconomic status on Chinese consumer brand preference," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Wong, Jimmy & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Wang, Jessie J., 2022. "The interactive effect of power and self-construal on consumers’ preferences for brand-logo size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 279-296.
    8. Shavitt, Sharon & Barnes, Aaron J., 2020. "Culture and the Consumer Journey," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 40-54.
    9. Huachao Gao & Karen Page Winterich & Yinlong Zhang, 2016. "All That Glitters Is Not Gold: How Others’ Status Influences the Effect of Power Distance Belief on Status Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 265-281.
    10. Wang, Jessie J. & Lalwani, Ashok K. & DelVecchio, Devon, 2022. "The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Consumers' Brand Preferences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 804-823.
    11. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    12. Qin, Yao & Wang, Xuehua, 2023. "Power distance belief and the desire for uniqueness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Xia Jiang & Fengyi Deng & Qing Yao & Defeng Yang, 2024. "Better or different? How mimicry by social groups shapes consumers’ preference for differentiated brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(5), pages 502-515, September.
    14. Huachao Gao & Yinlong Zhang, 2022. "How does power distance belief impact consumers’ responses to demotion in hierarchical loyalty programs? The dual processes of monetary and psychological losses," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 822-840, July.
    15. Koo, Jayoung & Im, Hyunjoo, 2019. "Going up or down? Effects of power deprivation on luxury consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 443-449.
    16. Ashok K. Lalwani & Lura Forcum, 2016. "Does a Dollar Get You a Dollar’s Worth of Merchandise? The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Price-Quality Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 317-333.
    17. Khalifa, Dina & Shukla, Paurav, 2021. "When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 110-121.
    18. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Xinxin Li, 2023. "Social Sharing, Public Perception, and Brand Competition in a Horizontally Differentiated Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 553-569, June.
    19. Louise May Hassan & Miriam McGowan & Edward Shiu, 2025. "They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 563-587, March.
    20. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling ideology through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2022.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:107:y:2020:i:c:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.