IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v105y2019icp405-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification

Author

Listed:
  • Hartman, Anna E.
  • Coslor, Erica

Abstract

This paper examines the rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in human egg commodification. We focus on the intermediaries (agencies) who match donors and recipients, examining their attempt to recruit potential donors through strategic communications. Using a rhetorical and semiotic approach, we analyzed 412 online advertisements on craigslist.org, recruiting women for commercial egg donation from across 30 US states (82 cities/regions). In this situation of institutional complexity, we find contradictory logics about gift giving and commodified market exchanges. In addition to reframing strategies that downplay opposition, we find interesting mixtures of what should be adversarial logics existing simultaneously. We contribute to an understanding of the use of rhetorical language structure and content of communications to navigate oppositional market and altruism logics, in addition to advancing knowledge about strategic communications by third-party intermediaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartman, Anna E. & Coslor, Erica, 2019. "Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 405-419.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:405-419
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319303121
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Perkmann & Maureen McKelvey & Nelson Phillips, 2019. "Protecting Scientists from Gordon Gekko: How Organizations Use Hybrid Spaces to Engage with Multiple Institutional Logics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 298-318, March.
    2. Paul Tracey, 2016. "Spreading the Word: The Microfoundations of Institutional Persuasion and Conversion," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 989-1009, August.
    3. Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Nelson Phillips, 2011. "Text Me! New Consumer Practices and Change in Organizational Fields," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1579-1599, December.
    4. Eileen Fischer & Cele C. Otnes & Linda Tuncay, 2007. "Pursuing Parenthood: Integrating Cultural and Cognitive Perspectives on Persistent Goal Striving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 425-440, May.
    5. Kieran Healy & Kimberly D. Krawiec, 2017. "Repugnance Management and Transactions in the Body," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 86-90, May.
    6. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Steven J. Kahl & Stine Grodal, 2016. "Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multilevel discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958)," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 149-166, January.
    7. Cherrier, Helene & Goswami, Paromita & Ray, Subhasis, 2018. "Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 245-258.
    8. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 1996. "Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 424-438, March.
    9. James H. McAlexander & Beth Leavenworth Dufault & Diane M. Martin & John W. Schouten, 2014. "The Marketization of Religion: Field, Capital, and Consumer Identity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 858-875.
    10. Ashlee Humphreys, 2010. "Semiotic Structure and the Legitimation of Consumption Practices: The Case of Casino Gambling," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 490-510, October.
    11. Carlos Ramirez, 2013. "‘We are being Pilloried for Something, We Did Not Even Know We Had Done Wrong!’ Quality Control and Orders of Worth in the British Audit Profession," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 845-869, July.
    12. Carlos Ramirez, 2013. "'We are being Pilloried for Something, We Did Not Even Know We Had Done Wrong!' Quality Control and Orders of Worth in the British Audit Profession," Post-Print hal-00836253, HAL.
    13. Timmermans, Stefan & Almeling, Rene, 2009. "Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care: A conceptual readjustment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 21-27, July.
    14. Pierre-Yann Dolbec & Eileen Fischer, 2015. "Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1447-1468.
    15. Cornelissen, J. P. & Durand, Rodolphe & Fiss, Peer C. & Lammers, John & Vaara, Eero, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," HEC Research Papers Series 1168, HEC Paris.
    16. Ashlee Humphreys & Kathryn A. Latour, 2013. "Framing the Game: Assessing the Impact of Cultural Representations on Consumer Perceptions of Legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 773-795.
    17. Paul Tracey & Nelson Phillips & Owen Jarvis, 2011. "Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 60-80, February.
    18. Belk, Russell W & Wallendorf, Melanie & Sherry, John F, Jr, 1989. "The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    2. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Raghu Garud & Nelson Phillips, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Framing: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 578-606, May.
    3. Corciolani, Matteo, 2023. "Navigating institutional complexity through emotion work: The case of Italian consumers adapting to a ketogenic diet," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    2. Slater, Stephanie & Demangeot, Catherine, 2021. "Marketer acculturation to diversity needs: The case of modest fashion across two multicultural contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 702-715.
    3. Stephanie Slater & Catherine Demangeot, 2021. "Marketer acculturation to diversity needs: The case of modest fashion across two multicultural contexts," Post-Print hal-03600360, HAL.
    4. Wiart, Lucie & Özçağlar-Toulouse, Nil & Shaw, Deirdre, 2022. "Maintaining market legitimacy: A discursive-hegemonic perspective on meat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 391-402.
    5. Steven Shepherd & Ted Matherly, 2021. "Racialization of peer‐to‐peer transactions: Inequality and barriers to legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 417-444, June.
    6. Corciolani, Matteo, 2023. "Navigating institutional complexity through emotion work: The case of Italian consumers adapting to a ketogenic diet," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    8. Veronique Cova & Diego Rinallo, 2015. "Revisiting the separation between sacred and profane: Boundary-work in pilgrimage experiences," Post-Print hal-01492432, HAL.
    9. Ghio, Alessandro & Verona, Roberto, 2022. "Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    10. Arindam Das & Himadri Roy Chaudhuri & Paromita Goswami, 2023. "The catharsis of male consumption: Reimagining masculinity in India," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 4-35, January.
    11. Christopher Wright & Daniel Nyberg, 2022. "The Roles of Celebrities in Public Disputes: Climate Change and the Great Barrier Reef," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1788-1816, November.
    12. Castilhos, Rodrigo B. & Fonseca, Marcelo J., 2016. "Pursuing upward transformation: The construction of a progressing self among dominated consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 6-17.
    13. Daniel Muzio & David M. Brock & Roy Suddaby, 2013. "Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 699-721, July.
    14. Amélie Clauzel & Hélène Delacour & Sébastien Liarte, 2019. "When cuisine becomes less haute : The impact of expert ratings on consumers' legitimacy judgments," Post-Print hal-02513471, HAL.
    15. Shekhar, Sudhanshu & Manoharan, Bhupesh & Rakshit, Krishanu, 2020. "Going cashless: Change in institutional logic and consumption practices in the face of institutional disruption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 60-79.
    16. Wu, Xiaojie & Tan, Xiaoxia & Wang, Xiuqiong, 2023. "The institutional logics perspective in management and organizational studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Gupta, Parul & Chauhan, Sumedha & Paul, Justin & Jaiswal, M.P., 2020. "Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 209-229.
    18. Higgins, Leighanne & Hamilton, Kathy, 2016. "Mini-miracles: Transformations of self from consumption of the Lourdes pilgrimage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 25-32.
    19. Löhlein, Lukas & Müßig, Anke, 2020. "At the boundaries of institutional theorizing: Individual entrepreneurship in episodes of regulatory change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Patrick Gregori & Malgorzata A. Wdowiak & Erich J. Schwarz & Patrick Holzmann, 2019. "Exploring Value Creation in Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Insights from the Institutional Logics Perspective and the Business Model Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:405-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.