The banking bailout of the subprime crisis: Was the bang worth the buck?
We employ event study methodology to examine government policies aimed at rescuing banks from the effects of the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Announcements directed at the banking system as a whole were associated with positive cumulative abnormal returns, whereas announcements directed at specific banks were associated with negative cumulative abnormal returns. The effects of foreign general announcements spilled over across different areas and were perceived by home-country banks as subsidies to foreign banks. Specific announcements produced effects consistent with other banks being crowded out for government resources. Multiple specific announcements exacerbated banks’ moral hazard. Findings suggest that individual institutions were reluctant to seek public assistance.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 23 (2013)
Issue (Month): C ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/intfin|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfin:v:23:y:2013:i:c:p:240-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.