IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/injoed/v114y2025ics0738059325000574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does reputation matter? The impact of China’s double world-class policy on the attraction of high-quality students

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Tian-Tian
  • Zeng, Hui

Abstract

Based on the undergraduate entrance examination data from 2014 to 2021 in China, this study develops a difference-in-differences model and finds that developing world-class universities and disciplines (i.e., the double world-class, the DWC policy) leads to an increase of 4.48 and 5.51 points in the average entrance examination scores of undergraduates for the universities and disciplines included in the DWC policy. The DWC policy has improved the student quality of the world-class universities and disciplines mainly by raising their reputation. Moreover, the impact of the DWC policy on the world-class disciplines varies. Specifically, the DWC policy significantly improves student quality in science, agriculture, and medicine, but it has no significant effect on student quality in engineering; and the improvement in the scores for science is much higher than that for agriculture and medicine. Third, compared to the popular disciplines traditionally favored by students, the DWC policy has a more significant impact on improving the entrance examination scores for unpopular disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Tian-Tian & Zeng, Hui, 2025. "Does reputation matter? The impact of China’s double world-class policy on the attraction of high-quality students," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:114:y:2025:i:c:s0738059325000574
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000574
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:injoed:v:114:y:2025:i:c:s0738059325000574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-educational-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.